Officer Discretion and Minority Ethnic Housing Provision

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the 1980s housing associations have supplanted local authorities as the major providers of new social housing in Britain. This development has been criticised as threatening to introduce particularism and socially constructed definitions of deserving/undeserving status in place of democratically accountable provision. However this article argues that fears about the actions of "unaccountable" housing associations are based upon a falsely grounded nostalgia for local state housing. For example the concept of local authority accountability has been largely notional for minority ethnic communities who have been marginalised and excluded from access to local authority housing. Therefore the potential for housing associations to develop more responsive policies is examined. Primary research from a major British housing association is used to focus upon the opportunities and constraints facing minority ethnic communities as a result of the discretionary role of social gatekeepers. However, it is noted that even the sensitive use of officer discretion may still represent paternalistic provision for minority ethnic communities. Consequently it is suggested that state provision throughout Europe should respond to difference by embracing the potential of a pluralistic housing policy. This would include facilitating opportunities for minority ethnic self-provision of housing alongside universal provision.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-197
Number of pages18
JournalNetherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
Volume12
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Fingerprint

national minority
housing
community
particularism
social housing
gatekeeper
nostalgia
housing policy
anxiety
responsibility

Keywords

  • Social housing
  • Race equality
  • street-level bureaucracy
  • Officer discretion
  • Ethnicity
  • Discrimination

Cite this

Officer Discretion and Minority Ethnic Housing Provision. / Tomlins, Richard.

In: Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment , Vol. 12, No. 2, 1997, p. 179-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8e407017a8c5466493281134cf3e05aa,
title = "Officer Discretion and Minority Ethnic Housing Provision",
abstract = "Since the 1980s housing associations have supplanted local authorities as the major providers of new social housing in Britain. This development has been criticised as threatening to introduce particularism and socially constructed definitions of deserving/undeserving status in place of democratically accountable provision. However this article argues that fears about the actions of {"}unaccountable{"} housing associations are based upon a falsely grounded nostalgia for local state housing. For example the concept of local authority accountability has been largely notional for minority ethnic communities who have been marginalised and excluded from access to local authority housing. Therefore the potential for housing associations to develop more responsive policies is examined. Primary research from a major British housing association is used to focus upon the opportunities and constraints facing minority ethnic communities as a result of the discretionary role of social gatekeepers. However, it is noted that even the sensitive use of officer discretion may still represent paternalistic provision for minority ethnic communities. Consequently it is suggested that state provision throughout Europe should respond to difference by embracing the potential of a pluralistic housing policy. This would include facilitating opportunities for minority ethnic self-provision of housing alongside universal provision.",
keywords = "Social housing, Race equality, street-level bureaucracy, Officer discretion, Ethnicity, Discrimination",
author = "Richard Tomlins",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "179--197",
journal = "Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Officer Discretion and Minority Ethnic Housing Provision

AU - Tomlins, Richard

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Since the 1980s housing associations have supplanted local authorities as the major providers of new social housing in Britain. This development has been criticised as threatening to introduce particularism and socially constructed definitions of deserving/undeserving status in place of democratically accountable provision. However this article argues that fears about the actions of "unaccountable" housing associations are based upon a falsely grounded nostalgia for local state housing. For example the concept of local authority accountability has been largely notional for minority ethnic communities who have been marginalised and excluded from access to local authority housing. Therefore the potential for housing associations to develop more responsive policies is examined. Primary research from a major British housing association is used to focus upon the opportunities and constraints facing minority ethnic communities as a result of the discretionary role of social gatekeepers. However, it is noted that even the sensitive use of officer discretion may still represent paternalistic provision for minority ethnic communities. Consequently it is suggested that state provision throughout Europe should respond to difference by embracing the potential of a pluralistic housing policy. This would include facilitating opportunities for minority ethnic self-provision of housing alongside universal provision.

AB - Since the 1980s housing associations have supplanted local authorities as the major providers of new social housing in Britain. This development has been criticised as threatening to introduce particularism and socially constructed definitions of deserving/undeserving status in place of democratically accountable provision. However this article argues that fears about the actions of "unaccountable" housing associations are based upon a falsely grounded nostalgia for local state housing. For example the concept of local authority accountability has been largely notional for minority ethnic communities who have been marginalised and excluded from access to local authority housing. Therefore the potential for housing associations to develop more responsive policies is examined. Primary research from a major British housing association is used to focus upon the opportunities and constraints facing minority ethnic communities as a result of the discretionary role of social gatekeepers. However, it is noted that even the sensitive use of officer discretion may still represent paternalistic provision for minority ethnic communities. Consequently it is suggested that state provision throughout Europe should respond to difference by embracing the potential of a pluralistic housing policy. This would include facilitating opportunities for minority ethnic self-provision of housing alongside universal provision.

KW - Social housing

KW - Race equality

KW - street-level bureaucracy

KW - Officer discretion

KW - Ethnicity

KW - Discrimination

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 179

EP - 197

JO - Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

JF - Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

IS - 2

ER -