Offender engagement in group programs and associations with offender characteristics and treatment factors: A review

Emma Holdsworth, Erica Bowen, Sarah J. Brown, Douglas Howat

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    26 Citations (Scopus)
    29 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The aim of this review is to establish how offender engagement within group programs has been conceptualized, defined or assessed, and the factors that are associated with it. Existing models describe determinants of engagement and the process of behavioral change, but there is little in the way of theory explaining the process of engagement in treatment and change. Forty-seven studies were reviewed and revealed inconsistent definitions and assessments of engagement as well as inconsistent use of measures which contributes to confusion about the scope of engagement and reflects the lack of theory. Attendance, completion or dropout rates were frequently relied upon, but may not reliably infer engagement. Participation and out of session behaviors in conjunction with one another, reflecting a series of active responses to treatment, may more reliably reflect engagement in treatment and change. A model for offender engagement is presented which might help clarify the role of engagement variables. Offender demographics appeared to be of little value in predicting engagement, with only a small number of psychosocial factors (hostility, impulsivity) predicting low levels of engagement and most others (anger, anxiety) having little influence. Treatment factors (therapeutic relationship, program objectives) were more consistently related to engagement, but are under-researched.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)102–121
    Number of pages20
    JournalAggression and Violent Behavior
    Volume19
    Issue number2
    Early online date30 Jan 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Therapeutics
    Hostility
    Impulsive Behavior
    Anger
    Anxiety
    Demography
    Psychology

    Bibliographical note

    NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Aggression and Violent Behavior. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Aggression and Violent Behavior [Vol 19, Issue 2 (2014), DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.01.004.

    Keywords

    • Offender
    • Engagement
    • Group
    • Treatment
    • Program
    • Change

    Cite this

    Offender engagement in group programs and associations with offender characteristics and treatment factors: A review. / Holdsworth, Emma; Bowen, Erica; Brown, Sarah J.; Howat, Douglas.

    In: Aggression and Violent Behavior, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2014, p. 102–121.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{80ea68b1dab1448dac1adb7e1a8d36f6,
    title = "Offender engagement in group programs and associations with offender characteristics and treatment factors: A review",
    abstract = "The aim of this review is to establish how offender engagement within group programs has been conceptualized, defined or assessed, and the factors that are associated with it. Existing models describe determinants of engagement and the process of behavioral change, but there is little in the way of theory explaining the process of engagement in treatment and change. Forty-seven studies were reviewed and revealed inconsistent definitions and assessments of engagement as well as inconsistent use of measures which contributes to confusion about the scope of engagement and reflects the lack of theory. Attendance, completion or dropout rates were frequently relied upon, but may not reliably infer engagement. Participation and out of session behaviors in conjunction with one another, reflecting a series of active responses to treatment, may more reliably reflect engagement in treatment and change. A model for offender engagement is presented which might help clarify the role of engagement variables. Offender demographics appeared to be of little value in predicting engagement, with only a small number of psychosocial factors (hostility, impulsivity) predicting low levels of engagement and most others (anger, anxiety) having little influence. Treatment factors (therapeutic relationship, program objectives) were more consistently related to engagement, but are under-researched.",
    keywords = "Offender, Engagement, Group, Treatment, Program, Change",
    author = "Emma Holdsworth and Erica Bowen and Brown, {Sarah J.} and Douglas Howat",
    note = "NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Aggression and Violent Behavior. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Aggression and Violent Behavior [Vol 19, Issue 2 (2014), DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.01.004.",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1016/j.avb.2014.01.004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "19",
    pages = "102–121",
    journal = "Aggression and Violent Behavior",
    issn = "1359-1789",
    publisher = "Elsevier Masson",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Offender engagement in group programs and associations with offender characteristics and treatment factors: A review

    AU - Holdsworth, Emma

    AU - Bowen, Erica

    AU - Brown, Sarah J.

    AU - Howat, Douglas

    N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Aggression and Violent Behavior. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Aggression and Violent Behavior [Vol 19, Issue 2 (2014), DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.01.004.

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - The aim of this review is to establish how offender engagement within group programs has been conceptualized, defined or assessed, and the factors that are associated with it. Existing models describe determinants of engagement and the process of behavioral change, but there is little in the way of theory explaining the process of engagement in treatment and change. Forty-seven studies were reviewed and revealed inconsistent definitions and assessments of engagement as well as inconsistent use of measures which contributes to confusion about the scope of engagement and reflects the lack of theory. Attendance, completion or dropout rates were frequently relied upon, but may not reliably infer engagement. Participation and out of session behaviors in conjunction with one another, reflecting a series of active responses to treatment, may more reliably reflect engagement in treatment and change. A model for offender engagement is presented which might help clarify the role of engagement variables. Offender demographics appeared to be of little value in predicting engagement, with only a small number of psychosocial factors (hostility, impulsivity) predicting low levels of engagement and most others (anger, anxiety) having little influence. Treatment factors (therapeutic relationship, program objectives) were more consistently related to engagement, but are under-researched.

    AB - The aim of this review is to establish how offender engagement within group programs has been conceptualized, defined or assessed, and the factors that are associated with it. Existing models describe determinants of engagement and the process of behavioral change, but there is little in the way of theory explaining the process of engagement in treatment and change. Forty-seven studies were reviewed and revealed inconsistent definitions and assessments of engagement as well as inconsistent use of measures which contributes to confusion about the scope of engagement and reflects the lack of theory. Attendance, completion or dropout rates were frequently relied upon, but may not reliably infer engagement. Participation and out of session behaviors in conjunction with one another, reflecting a series of active responses to treatment, may more reliably reflect engagement in treatment and change. A model for offender engagement is presented which might help clarify the role of engagement variables. Offender demographics appeared to be of little value in predicting engagement, with only a small number of psychosocial factors (hostility, impulsivity) predicting low levels of engagement and most others (anger, anxiety) having little influence. Treatment factors (therapeutic relationship, program objectives) were more consistently related to engagement, but are under-researched.

    KW - Offender

    KW - Engagement

    KW - Group

    KW - Treatment

    KW - Program

    KW - Change

    U2 - 10.1016/j.avb.2014.01.004

    DO - 10.1016/j.avb.2014.01.004

    M3 - Article

    VL - 19

    SP - 102

    EP - 121

    JO - Aggression and Violent Behavior

    JF - Aggression and Violent Behavior

    SN - 1359-1789

    IS - 2

    ER -