‘No one gives you a chance to say what you are thinking’: finding space for children's agency in the UK asylum system

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing on research undertaken with separated children seeking asylum in the UK, this paper explores the ways in which children's political identities and experiences have been conceptualised in procedures for determining who is – and is not – in need of protection under international refugee law. The paper focuses in particular on the experiences of separated children during the asylum interview. It is suggested that the conduct of the interview not only indicates a basic lack of humanity and care in engaging with the experiences of separated asylum-seeking children, but also a particular conceptualisation of ‘childhood’ that undermines the ability of children to fully articulate their experiences and to secure access to the protection to which they are entitled. The consequence of this approach is not only that separated asylum-seeking children are significantly less likely than adults to be granted refugee status, but that children who express political views and agency may not be considered to be children at all.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)162-169
Number of pages8
JournalArea
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2010

Fingerprint

refugee
experience
refugee law
political identity
interview
international law
childhood
lack
ability
need

Keywords

  • asylum
  • Refugees
  • children and young people
  • Childhood
  • Age disputes
  • Interviews
  • United Kingdom

Cite this

‘No one gives you a chance to say what you are thinking’ : finding space for children's agency in the UK asylum system. / Crawley, Heaven.

In: Area, Vol. 42, No. 2, 04.05.2010, p. 162-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8f4ecee98ca1454393a2f3f25442f878,
title = "‘No one gives you a chance to say what you are thinking’: finding space for children's agency in the UK asylum system",
abstract = "Drawing on research undertaken with separated children seeking asylum in the UK, this paper explores the ways in which children's political identities and experiences have been conceptualised in procedures for determining who is – and is not – in need of protection under international refugee law. The paper focuses in particular on the experiences of separated children during the asylum interview. It is suggested that the conduct of the interview not only indicates a basic lack of humanity and care in engaging with the experiences of separated asylum-seeking children, but also a particular conceptualisation of ‘childhood’ that undermines the ability of children to fully articulate their experiences and to secure access to the protection to which they are entitled. The consequence of this approach is not only that separated asylum-seeking children are significantly less likely than adults to be granted refugee status, but that children who express political views and agency may not be considered to be children at all.",
keywords = "asylum, Refugees, children and young people, Childhood, Age disputes, Interviews, United Kingdom",
author = "Heaven Crawley",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00917.x",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "162--169",
journal = "Area",
issn = "0004-0894",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘No one gives you a chance to say what you are thinking’

T2 - finding space for children's agency in the UK asylum system

AU - Crawley, Heaven

PY - 2010/5/4

Y1 - 2010/5/4

N2 - Drawing on research undertaken with separated children seeking asylum in the UK, this paper explores the ways in which children's political identities and experiences have been conceptualised in procedures for determining who is – and is not – in need of protection under international refugee law. The paper focuses in particular on the experiences of separated children during the asylum interview. It is suggested that the conduct of the interview not only indicates a basic lack of humanity and care in engaging with the experiences of separated asylum-seeking children, but also a particular conceptualisation of ‘childhood’ that undermines the ability of children to fully articulate their experiences and to secure access to the protection to which they are entitled. The consequence of this approach is not only that separated asylum-seeking children are significantly less likely than adults to be granted refugee status, but that children who express political views and agency may not be considered to be children at all.

AB - Drawing on research undertaken with separated children seeking asylum in the UK, this paper explores the ways in which children's political identities and experiences have been conceptualised in procedures for determining who is – and is not – in need of protection under international refugee law. The paper focuses in particular on the experiences of separated children during the asylum interview. It is suggested that the conduct of the interview not only indicates a basic lack of humanity and care in engaging with the experiences of separated asylum-seeking children, but also a particular conceptualisation of ‘childhood’ that undermines the ability of children to fully articulate their experiences and to secure access to the protection to which they are entitled. The consequence of this approach is not only that separated asylum-seeking children are significantly less likely than adults to be granted refugee status, but that children who express political views and agency may not be considered to be children at all.

KW - asylum

KW - Refugees

KW - children and young people

KW - Childhood

KW - Age disputes

KW - Interviews

KW - United Kingdom

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00917.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00917.x

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 162

EP - 169

JO - Area

JF - Area

SN - 0004-0894

IS - 2

ER -