No dose-response effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse concentration on 5 km running performance in recreational athletes

Neil D. Clarke, James R. Thomas, Marion Kagka, Roger Ramsbottom, Anne Delextrat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Oral carbohydrate rinsing has been demonstrated to provide beneficial effects on exercise performance of durations of up to one hour, albeit predominately in a laboratory setting. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of different concentrations of carbohydrate solution mouth-rinse on 5 km running performance. Fifteen healthy men (n=9; mean±SD age: 42±10 years; height: 177.6±6.1 cm; body mass: 73.9±8.9 kg) and women (n=6; mean±SD age: 43±9 years; height: 166.5±4.1 cm; body mass: 65.7±6.8 kg) performed a 5 km running time trial on a track on four separate occasions. Immediately before starting the time trial and then after each 1 km, subjects rinsed 25 mL of either 0, 3, 6, or 12% maltodextrin for 10 s. Mouth-rinsing with 0, 3, 6 or 12% maltodextrin did not have a significant effect on the time to complete the time trial (0%: 26:34±4:07 min:sec; 3%: 27:17±4:33 min:sec; 6%: 27:05±3:52 min:sec; 12%: 26:47±4.31 min:sec; P=0.071; 2 P  =0.15), heart rate (P=0.095; 2 P  =0.16), rating of perceived exertion (RPE) (P=0.195; 2 P  =0.11), blood glucose (P=0.920; 2 P  =0.01) and blood lactate concentration (P=0.831; 2 P  =0.02), with only non-significant trivial to small differences between concentrations. Results of this study suggest that carbohydrate mouth-rinsing provides no ergogenic advantage over that of an acaloric placebo (0%), and that there is no dose-response relationship between carbohydrate solution concentration and 5 km track running performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)715-720
Number of pages6
JournalThe Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
Volume31
Issue number3
Early online date30 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Athletes
Mouth
Carbohydrates
Blood Glucose
Lactic Acid
Heart Rate
Placebos
maltodextrin

Bibliographical note

This article is currently in press. Full citation details will be uploaded when available.

Due to publisher policy, the full text is not available on the repository until the 30th of June 2017

Keywords

  • Maltodextrin
  • Oral receptors
  • Field-based

Cite this

No dose-response effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse concentration on 5 km running performance in recreational athletes. / Clarke, Neil D.; Thomas, James R.; Kagka, Marion; Ramsbottom, Roger; Delextrat, Anne.

In: The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 715-720.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Clarke, Neil D. ; Thomas, James R. ; Kagka, Marion ; Ramsbottom, Roger ; Delextrat, Anne. / No dose-response effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse concentration on 5 km running performance in recreational athletes. In: The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 3. pp. 715-720.
@article{79816fb4e4984004b0eff3bdae3d7953,
title = "No dose-response effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse concentration on 5 km running performance in recreational athletes",
abstract = "Oral carbohydrate rinsing has been demonstrated to provide beneficial effects on exercise performance of durations of up to one hour, albeit predominately in a laboratory setting. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of different concentrations of carbohydrate solution mouth-rinse on 5 km running performance. Fifteen healthy men (n=9; mean±SD age: 42±10 years; height: 177.6±6.1 cm; body mass: 73.9±8.9 kg) and women (n=6; mean±SD age: 43±9 years; height: 166.5±4.1 cm; body mass: 65.7±6.8 kg) performed a 5 km running time trial on a track on four separate occasions. Immediately before starting the time trial and then after each 1 km, subjects rinsed 25 mL of either 0, 3, 6, or 12{\%} maltodextrin for 10 s. Mouth-rinsing with 0, 3, 6 or 12{\%} maltodextrin did not have a significant effect on the time to complete the time trial (0{\%}: 26:34±4:07 min:sec; 3{\%}: 27:17±4:33 min:sec; 6{\%}: 27:05±3:52 min:sec; 12{\%}: 26:47±4.31 min:sec; P=0.071; 2 P  =0.15), heart rate (P=0.095; 2 P  =0.16), rating of perceived exertion (RPE) (P=0.195; 2 P  =0.11), blood glucose (P=0.920; 2 P  =0.01) and blood lactate concentration (P=0.831; 2 P  =0.02), with only non-significant trivial to small differences between concentrations. Results of this study suggest that carbohydrate mouth-rinsing provides no ergogenic advantage over that of an acaloric placebo (0{\%}), and that there is no dose-response relationship between carbohydrate solution concentration and 5 km track running performance.",
keywords = "Maltodextrin, Oral receptors, Field-based",
author = "Clarke, {Neil D.} and Thomas, {James R.} and Marion Kagka and Roger Ramsbottom and Anne Delextrat",
note = "This article is currently in press. Full citation details will be uploaded when available. Due to publisher policy, the full text is not available on the repository until the 30th of June 2017",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0000000000001531",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "715--720",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - No dose-response effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse concentration on 5 km running performance in recreational athletes

AU - Clarke, Neil D.

AU - Thomas, James R.

AU - Kagka, Marion

AU - Ramsbottom, Roger

AU - Delextrat, Anne

N1 - This article is currently in press. Full citation details will be uploaded when available. Due to publisher policy, the full text is not available on the repository until the 30th of June 2017

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Oral carbohydrate rinsing has been demonstrated to provide beneficial effects on exercise performance of durations of up to one hour, albeit predominately in a laboratory setting. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of different concentrations of carbohydrate solution mouth-rinse on 5 km running performance. Fifteen healthy men (n=9; mean±SD age: 42±10 years; height: 177.6±6.1 cm; body mass: 73.9±8.9 kg) and women (n=6; mean±SD age: 43±9 years; height: 166.5±4.1 cm; body mass: 65.7±6.8 kg) performed a 5 km running time trial on a track on four separate occasions. Immediately before starting the time trial and then after each 1 km, subjects rinsed 25 mL of either 0, 3, 6, or 12% maltodextrin for 10 s. Mouth-rinsing with 0, 3, 6 or 12% maltodextrin did not have a significant effect on the time to complete the time trial (0%: 26:34±4:07 min:sec; 3%: 27:17±4:33 min:sec; 6%: 27:05±3:52 min:sec; 12%: 26:47±4.31 min:sec; P=0.071; 2 P  =0.15), heart rate (P=0.095; 2 P  =0.16), rating of perceived exertion (RPE) (P=0.195; 2 P  =0.11), blood glucose (P=0.920; 2 P  =0.01) and blood lactate concentration (P=0.831; 2 P  =0.02), with only non-significant trivial to small differences between concentrations. Results of this study suggest that carbohydrate mouth-rinsing provides no ergogenic advantage over that of an acaloric placebo (0%), and that there is no dose-response relationship between carbohydrate solution concentration and 5 km track running performance.

AB - Oral carbohydrate rinsing has been demonstrated to provide beneficial effects on exercise performance of durations of up to one hour, albeit predominately in a laboratory setting. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of different concentrations of carbohydrate solution mouth-rinse on 5 km running performance. Fifteen healthy men (n=9; mean±SD age: 42±10 years; height: 177.6±6.1 cm; body mass: 73.9±8.9 kg) and women (n=6; mean±SD age: 43±9 years; height: 166.5±4.1 cm; body mass: 65.7±6.8 kg) performed a 5 km running time trial on a track on four separate occasions. Immediately before starting the time trial and then after each 1 km, subjects rinsed 25 mL of either 0, 3, 6, or 12% maltodextrin for 10 s. Mouth-rinsing with 0, 3, 6 or 12% maltodextrin did not have a significant effect on the time to complete the time trial (0%: 26:34±4:07 min:sec; 3%: 27:17±4:33 min:sec; 6%: 27:05±3:52 min:sec; 12%: 26:47±4.31 min:sec; P=0.071; 2 P  =0.15), heart rate (P=0.095; 2 P  =0.16), rating of perceived exertion (RPE) (P=0.195; 2 P  =0.11), blood glucose (P=0.920; 2 P  =0.01) and blood lactate concentration (P=0.831; 2 P  =0.02), with only non-significant trivial to small differences between concentrations. Results of this study suggest that carbohydrate mouth-rinsing provides no ergogenic advantage over that of an acaloric placebo (0%), and that there is no dose-response relationship between carbohydrate solution concentration and 5 km track running performance.

KW - Maltodextrin

KW - Oral receptors

KW - Field-based

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001531

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001531

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 715

EP - 720

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 3

ER -