News media portrayal of attributed stakeholder attitudes to shark management in Australia

Nigel Hardiman, Shelley Burgin, Jia Shao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Shark attacks have increased globally and are one of the most widely reported human-wildlife conflicts. Reflecting global trends, the number of recorded attacks has increased in Australian waters. Whether positively or negatively affected, stakeholders potentially often pressure authorities to mitigate economic and human risks when developing shark management policies. This article used discourse analysis to review how attitudes toward management approaches were attributed in Australian newspapers to a range of stakeholders. The most frequently attributed stakeholders were journalists and public office holders; victims, commercial operators, and scientists were least attributed. Although most measures were portrayed as supported by a majority of stakeholders, there was apparent misalignment between reported public and policymaker attitudes, especially regarding lethal control. Despite the ramifications (e.g., social, biological) of shark management and policymaking, reporting of science-informed facts and use of scientists to inform debate were low. Opportunities exist for increased engagement among scientists, journalists, and policymakers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)548-563
Number of pages16
JournalHuman Dimensions of Wildlife
Volume24
Issue number6
Early online date24 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

shark
stakeholder
economics
water
public

Keywords

  • Stakeholder attitudes
  • community attitudes
  • human-wildlife conflict
  • public opinion
  • shark management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

News media portrayal of attributed stakeholder attitudes to shark management in Australia. / Hardiman, Nigel; Burgin, Shelley; Shao, Jia.

In: Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol. 24, No. 6, 02.11.2019, p. 548-563.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce918f713ed948f8917c5dcc2d5f14e3,
title = "News media portrayal of attributed stakeholder attitudes to shark management in Australia",
abstract = "Shark attacks have increased globally and are one of the most widely reported human-wildlife conflicts. Reflecting global trends, the number of recorded attacks has increased in Australian waters. Whether positively or negatively affected, stakeholders potentially often pressure authorities to mitigate economic and human risks when developing shark management policies. This article used discourse analysis to review how attitudes toward management approaches were attributed in Australian newspapers to a range of stakeholders. The most frequently attributed stakeholders were journalists and public office holders; victims, commercial operators, and scientists were least attributed. Although most measures were portrayed as supported by a majority of stakeholders, there was apparent misalignment between reported public and policymaker attitudes, especially regarding lethal control. Despite the ramifications (e.g., social, biological) of shark management and policymaking, reporting of science-informed facts and use of scientists to inform debate were low. Opportunities exist for increased engagement among scientists, journalists, and policymakers.",
keywords = "Stakeholder attitudes, community attitudes, human-wildlife conflict, public opinion, shark management",
author = "Nigel Hardiman and Shelley Burgin and Jia Shao",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10871209.2019.1663455",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "548--563",
journal = "Human Dimensions of Wildlife",
issn = "1087-1209",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - News media portrayal of attributed stakeholder attitudes to shark management in Australia

AU - Hardiman, Nigel

AU - Burgin, Shelley

AU - Shao, Jia

PY - 2019/11/2

Y1 - 2019/11/2

N2 - Shark attacks have increased globally and are one of the most widely reported human-wildlife conflicts. Reflecting global trends, the number of recorded attacks has increased in Australian waters. Whether positively or negatively affected, stakeholders potentially often pressure authorities to mitigate economic and human risks when developing shark management policies. This article used discourse analysis to review how attitudes toward management approaches were attributed in Australian newspapers to a range of stakeholders. The most frequently attributed stakeholders were journalists and public office holders; victims, commercial operators, and scientists were least attributed. Although most measures were portrayed as supported by a majority of stakeholders, there was apparent misalignment between reported public and policymaker attitudes, especially regarding lethal control. Despite the ramifications (e.g., social, biological) of shark management and policymaking, reporting of science-informed facts and use of scientists to inform debate were low. Opportunities exist for increased engagement among scientists, journalists, and policymakers.

AB - Shark attacks have increased globally and are one of the most widely reported human-wildlife conflicts. Reflecting global trends, the number of recorded attacks has increased in Australian waters. Whether positively or negatively affected, stakeholders potentially often pressure authorities to mitigate economic and human risks when developing shark management policies. This article used discourse analysis to review how attitudes toward management approaches were attributed in Australian newspapers to a range of stakeholders. The most frequently attributed stakeholders were journalists and public office holders; victims, commercial operators, and scientists were least attributed. Although most measures were portrayed as supported by a majority of stakeholders, there was apparent misalignment between reported public and policymaker attitudes, especially regarding lethal control. Despite the ramifications (e.g., social, biological) of shark management and policymaking, reporting of science-informed facts and use of scientists to inform debate were low. Opportunities exist for increased engagement among scientists, journalists, and policymakers.

KW - Stakeholder attitudes

KW - community attitudes

KW - human-wildlife conflict

KW - public opinion

KW - shark management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073625677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10871209.2019.1663455

DO - 10.1080/10871209.2019.1663455

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 548

EP - 563

JO - Human Dimensions of Wildlife

JF - Human Dimensions of Wildlife

SN - 1087-1209

IS - 6

ER -