Abstract
The post-acquisition integration phase is widely recognized as critical to the M&A process. However post-acquisition typologies suffer from inadequate empirical support or lack of comprehensiveness. This empirical paper responds to calls for methodological pluralism in M&A research, and uses a mixed method to assess the robustness of a leading post-acquisition integration typology. Through multiple cluster analyses, different post-acquisition strategies are identified and qualitative techniques allow them to be further explored. This approach overcomes some limitations of single method research in M&A and results in a more robust, fine-grained and extended post-acquisition typology. It enables a more nuanced perspective on the coexistence of exploration and exploitation gains with implications for practitioners and researchers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 235-251 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Long Range Planning |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 22 May 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2015 |