Natural resource curse: A literature survey and comparative assessment of regional groupings of oil-rich countries.

Marwan Alssadek, James Benhin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper provides an extensive review of the rapidly growing literature on the resource curse phenomenon, whereby natural resources-rich countries experience lower levels of economic growth and development than countries with fewer natural resources. The various theoretical explanations for the phenomenon, alongside a survey of the empirical literature, are critically discussed. Generally, the literature results are found to be mixed and no consensus is reached. This might be attributed to different time periods, data used, proxy for the natural resource variables selected and the estimation approach employed. The practical part of this paper applies a descriptive analysis to compare economic performance among sub-regional groupings of oil-rich developed and developing countries. Our results indicated that oil-rich developing countries have underperformed in several development outcomes particularly in Middle East and North African (MENA) and Sub-Sahara African (SSA) countries. The paper also provides some suggested policies to convert the resources curse into a blessing, in particular for these countries
Original languageEnglish
Article number103741
Number of pages23
JournalResources Policy
Volume84
Early online date11 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Keywords

  • Natural resource curse
  • Dutch disease
  • Institutions
  • Human capital
  • Financial development
  • Economic growth

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Natural resource curse: A literature survey and comparative assessment of regional groupings of oil-rich countries.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this