Narrating(−)Life – In Lieu of an Introduction

Stefan Herbrechter

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

‘Narrating life’ – this phrase warrants some investigation. Who is the ‘agency’ or the ‘subject’ in this phrase, ‘narrating’ or ‘life’? Who, or what, is narrating life? Which would mean that life was an object (or being subjected to narration), as if life was ‘in need of’ narrating in order to become what it ‘is’. Or, instead, might life be the narrator or the narrating instance: life that expresses itself through narration? In both cases, life ‘as such’ would be something ‘outside’ narration (while being in need of it) but, as such, it would remain invisible (at least for the (human?) observer). However insistent the questioning, life would not be able to yield its secrets ‘outside’ or ‘without’ narration. But life would always be ventriloquized by some (human?) narrator – unless, by some magical process of inscription, life was to do the narrating and writing ‘itself’ (which would presuppose a ‘self’, or at least some ‘sense of self’, selfreflexivity and thus consciousness, or at least iterability, in the Derridean sense – life itself).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNarrating Life – Experiments with Human and Animal Bodies in Literature, Science and Art
EditorsStefan Herbrechter, Elisabeth Friis
PublisherBrill
Pages1-13
Volume(In Press)
ISBN (Print)9789004302594
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Narration
Narrator
Consciousness
Warrants
Jacques Derrida
Iterability
Questioning
Observer

Bibliographical note

This is a forthcoming publication. Full citation details will be uploaded when available.

Cite this

Herbrechter, S. (2016). Narrating(−)Life – In Lieu of an Introduction. In S. Herbrechter, & E. Friis (Eds.), Narrating Life – Experiments with Human and Animal Bodies in Literature, Science and Art (Vol. (In Press), pp. 1-13). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004312074_002

Narrating(−)Life – In Lieu of an Introduction. / Herbrechter, Stefan.

Narrating Life – Experiments with Human and Animal Bodies in Literature, Science and Art. ed. / Stefan Herbrechter; Elisabeth Friis. Vol. (In Press) Brill, 2016. p. 1-13.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Herbrechter, S 2016, Narrating(−)Life – In Lieu of an Introduction. in S Herbrechter & E Friis (eds), Narrating Life – Experiments with Human and Animal Bodies in Literature, Science and Art. vol. (In Press), Brill, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004312074_002
Herbrechter S. Narrating(−)Life – In Lieu of an Introduction. In Herbrechter S, Friis E, editors, Narrating Life – Experiments with Human and Animal Bodies in Literature, Science and Art. Vol. (In Press). Brill. 2016. p. 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004312074_002
Herbrechter, Stefan. / Narrating(−)Life – In Lieu of an Introduction. Narrating Life – Experiments with Human and Animal Bodies in Literature, Science and Art. editor / Stefan Herbrechter ; Elisabeth Friis. Vol. (In Press) Brill, 2016. pp. 1-13
@inbook{62baf345aaeb412e8af3787910361276,
title = "Narrating(−)Life – In Lieu of an Introduction",
abstract = "‘Narrating life’ – this phrase warrants some investigation. Who is the ‘agency’ or the ‘subject’ in this phrase, ‘narrating’ or ‘life’? Who, or what, is narrating life? Which would mean that life was an object (or being subjected to narration), as if life was ‘in need of’ narrating in order to become what it ‘is’. Or, instead, might life be the narrator or the narrating instance: life that expresses itself through narration? In both cases, life ‘as such’ would be something ‘outside’ narration (while being in need of it) but, as such, it would remain invisible (at least for the (human?) observer). However insistent the questioning, life would not be able to yield its secrets ‘outside’ or ‘without’ narration. But life would always be ventriloquized by some (human?) narrator – unless, by some magical process of inscription, life was to do the narrating and writing ‘itself’ (which would presuppose a ‘self’, or at least some ‘sense of self’, selfreflexivity and thus consciousness, or at least iterability, in the Derridean sense – life itself).",
author = "Stefan Herbrechter",
note = "This is a forthcoming publication. Full citation details will be uploaded when available.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1163/9789004312074_002",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789004302594",
volume = "(In Press)",
pages = "1--13",
editor = "Stefan Herbrechter and Elisabeth Friis",
booktitle = "Narrating Life – Experiments with Human and Animal Bodies in Literature, Science and Art",
publisher = "Brill",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Narrating(−)Life – In Lieu of an Introduction

AU - Herbrechter, Stefan

N1 - This is a forthcoming publication. Full citation details will be uploaded when available.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - ‘Narrating life’ – this phrase warrants some investigation. Who is the ‘agency’ or the ‘subject’ in this phrase, ‘narrating’ or ‘life’? Who, or what, is narrating life? Which would mean that life was an object (or being subjected to narration), as if life was ‘in need of’ narrating in order to become what it ‘is’. Or, instead, might life be the narrator or the narrating instance: life that expresses itself through narration? In both cases, life ‘as such’ would be something ‘outside’ narration (while being in need of it) but, as such, it would remain invisible (at least for the (human?) observer). However insistent the questioning, life would not be able to yield its secrets ‘outside’ or ‘without’ narration. But life would always be ventriloquized by some (human?) narrator – unless, by some magical process of inscription, life was to do the narrating and writing ‘itself’ (which would presuppose a ‘self’, or at least some ‘sense of self’, selfreflexivity and thus consciousness, or at least iterability, in the Derridean sense – life itself).

AB - ‘Narrating life’ – this phrase warrants some investigation. Who is the ‘agency’ or the ‘subject’ in this phrase, ‘narrating’ or ‘life’? Who, or what, is narrating life? Which would mean that life was an object (or being subjected to narration), as if life was ‘in need of’ narrating in order to become what it ‘is’. Or, instead, might life be the narrator or the narrating instance: life that expresses itself through narration? In both cases, life ‘as such’ would be something ‘outside’ narration (while being in need of it) but, as such, it would remain invisible (at least for the (human?) observer). However insistent the questioning, life would not be able to yield its secrets ‘outside’ or ‘without’ narration. But life would always be ventriloquized by some (human?) narrator – unless, by some magical process of inscription, life was to do the narrating and writing ‘itself’ (which would presuppose a ‘self’, or at least some ‘sense of self’, selfreflexivity and thus consciousness, or at least iterability, in the Derridean sense – life itself).

U2 - 10.1163/9789004312074_002

DO - 10.1163/9789004312074_002

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789004302594

VL - (In Press)

SP - 1

EP - 13

BT - Narrating Life – Experiments with Human and Animal Bodies in Literature, Science and Art

A2 - Herbrechter, Stefan

A2 - Friis, Elisabeth

PB - Brill

ER -