Muddling on through? Cosmopolitan peacekeeping and the protection of civilians

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
48 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article analyses direct forms of the ‘protection of civilians’ (PoC) in United Nations (UN) peacekeeping, and how this links to aspirations outlined by cosmopolitan scholarship at the turn of the twentieth century. Its main contention is that cosmopolitan conceptions of peacekeeping, which advocate more active forms of civilian protection, have faced significant challenges in the UN peacekeeping system. These challenges (internal and external) are a result of the state-based nature of the UN, and its peacekeeping practice. Therefore, the UN’s flexibility to adopt ethical practices associated with PoC can only be contained within confined boundaries. The article takes as its starting point the aspirations of cosmopolitan scholarship before outlining policy development in UN peacekeeping concerning PoC. It then explores internal and external challenges faced in operationalizing PoC in UN peacekeeping practice before arguing that the UN may be at a stage where it is ‘muddling through’ in terms of PoC. The article contributes to debates about the role of peacekeeping in global politics, through seeking to understand the possible limits of cosmopolitanism within peacekeeping practice. Moreover, it offers a contemporary understanding of where the UN has developed PoC in its deployments and what challenges remain. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Peacekeeping on 1 Nov 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/ 10.1080/13533312.2016.1250627
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Peacekeeping
Volume(in press)
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

peacekeeping
UNO
cosmopolitanism
development policy
twentieth century
flexibility
politics

Bibliographical note

Due to publisher policy, the full text is not available on the repository until the 1st of May 2018.

This article is currently in press. Full citation details will be uploaded when available.

Keywords

  • Peacekeeping
  • Cosmopolitanism
  • United Nations
  • Protection of Civilians

Cite this

Muddling on through? Cosmopolitan peacekeeping and the protection of civilians. / Curran, David.

In: International Peacekeeping, Vol. (in press), 01.11.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c873ca66bd034dcc915720ce272384c9,
title = "Muddling on through? Cosmopolitan peacekeeping and the protection of civilians",
abstract = "This article analyses direct forms of the ‘protection of civilians’ (PoC) in United Nations (UN) peacekeeping, and how this links to aspirations outlined by cosmopolitan scholarship at the turn of the twentieth century. Its main contention is that cosmopolitan conceptions of peacekeeping, which advocate more active forms of civilian protection, have faced significant challenges in the UN peacekeeping system. These challenges (internal and external) are a result of the state-based nature of the UN, and its peacekeeping practice. Therefore, the UN’s flexibility to adopt ethical practices associated with PoC can only be contained within confined boundaries. The article takes as its starting point the aspirations of cosmopolitan scholarship before outlining policy development in UN peacekeeping concerning PoC. It then explores internal and external challenges faced in operationalizing PoC in UN peacekeeping practice before arguing that the UN may be at a stage where it is ‘muddling through’ in terms of PoC. The article contributes to debates about the role of peacekeeping in global politics, through seeking to understand the possible limits of cosmopolitanism within peacekeeping practice. Moreover, it offers a contemporary understanding of where the UN has developed PoC in its deployments and what challenges remain. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Peacekeeping on 1 Nov 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/ 10.1080/13533312.2016.1250627",
keywords = "Peacekeeping, Cosmopolitanism, United Nations, Protection of Civilians",
author = "David Curran",
note = "Due to publisher policy, the full text is not available on the repository until the 1st of May 2018. This article is currently in press. Full citation details will be uploaded when available.",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13533312.2016.1250627",
language = "English",
volume = "(in press)",
journal = "International Peacekeeping",
issn = "1353-3312",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Muddling on through? Cosmopolitan peacekeeping and the protection of civilians

AU - Curran, David

N1 - Due to publisher policy, the full text is not available on the repository until the 1st of May 2018. This article is currently in press. Full citation details will be uploaded when available.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - This article analyses direct forms of the ‘protection of civilians’ (PoC) in United Nations (UN) peacekeeping, and how this links to aspirations outlined by cosmopolitan scholarship at the turn of the twentieth century. Its main contention is that cosmopolitan conceptions of peacekeeping, which advocate more active forms of civilian protection, have faced significant challenges in the UN peacekeeping system. These challenges (internal and external) are a result of the state-based nature of the UN, and its peacekeeping practice. Therefore, the UN’s flexibility to adopt ethical practices associated with PoC can only be contained within confined boundaries. The article takes as its starting point the aspirations of cosmopolitan scholarship before outlining policy development in UN peacekeeping concerning PoC. It then explores internal and external challenges faced in operationalizing PoC in UN peacekeeping practice before arguing that the UN may be at a stage where it is ‘muddling through’ in terms of PoC. The article contributes to debates about the role of peacekeeping in global politics, through seeking to understand the possible limits of cosmopolitanism within peacekeeping practice. Moreover, it offers a contemporary understanding of where the UN has developed PoC in its deployments and what challenges remain. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Peacekeeping on 1 Nov 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/ 10.1080/13533312.2016.1250627

AB - This article analyses direct forms of the ‘protection of civilians’ (PoC) in United Nations (UN) peacekeeping, and how this links to aspirations outlined by cosmopolitan scholarship at the turn of the twentieth century. Its main contention is that cosmopolitan conceptions of peacekeeping, which advocate more active forms of civilian protection, have faced significant challenges in the UN peacekeeping system. These challenges (internal and external) are a result of the state-based nature of the UN, and its peacekeeping practice. Therefore, the UN’s flexibility to adopt ethical practices associated with PoC can only be contained within confined boundaries. The article takes as its starting point the aspirations of cosmopolitan scholarship before outlining policy development in UN peacekeeping concerning PoC. It then explores internal and external challenges faced in operationalizing PoC in UN peacekeeping practice before arguing that the UN may be at a stage where it is ‘muddling through’ in terms of PoC. The article contributes to debates about the role of peacekeeping in global politics, through seeking to understand the possible limits of cosmopolitanism within peacekeeping practice. Moreover, it offers a contemporary understanding of where the UN has developed PoC in its deployments and what challenges remain. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Peacekeeping on 1 Nov 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/ 10.1080/13533312.2016.1250627

KW - Peacekeeping

KW - Cosmopolitanism

KW - United Nations

KW - Protection of Civilians

U2 - 10.1080/13533312.2016.1250627

DO - 10.1080/13533312.2016.1250627

M3 - Article

VL - (in press)

JO - International Peacekeeping

JF - International Peacekeeping

SN - 1353-3312

ER -