Motion Sickness in Automated Vehicles with Forward and Rearward Facing Seating Orientations

Spencer Salter, Cyriel Diels, Paul Herriotts, Stratis Kanarachos, Doug Thake

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Automated vehicles (AV’s) offer greater flexibility in cabin design particularly in a future where no physical driving controls are required. One common concept for an automated vehicle is to have both forward and rearward facing seats. However, traveling backwards could lead to an increased likelihood of experiencing motion sickness due to the inability of occupants to anticipate the future motion trajectory. This study aimed to empirically evaluate the impact of seating orientation on the levels of motion sickness within an AV cabin. To this end, a vehicle was modified to replicate the common concept of automated vehicles with forward and rearward facing seats. Two routes were chosen to simulate motorway and urban driving. The participants were instructed to carry out typical office tasks whilst being driven in the vehicle which consisted of conducting a meeting, operating a personal device and taking notes. The participants conducted the test twice to experience both forward and rearward seating orientations in a randomised crossover design. Levels of sickness reported was relatively low with a significant increase in the mean level of sickness recorded when traveling rearwards. As expected, this increase was particularly pronounced under urban driving conditions. It is concluded that rearward travel in automated vehicles will compromise the passenger experience.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-61
Number of pages8
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume78
Early online date19 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Motion Sickness
illness
Cross-Over Studies
Equipment and Supplies
Seats
compromise
experience
flexibility
travel
Trajectories

Bibliographical note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Applied Ergonomics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Applied Ergonomics, [78], (2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.02.001

© 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Funder

JLR sponsored PhD

Keywords

  • Automated vehicle
  • Motion sickness
  • Seating orientation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Motion Sickness in Automated Vehicles with Forward and Rearward Facing Seating Orientations. / Salter, Spencer; Diels, Cyriel; Herriotts, Paul; Kanarachos, Stratis; Thake, Doug.

In: Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 78, 07.2019, p. 54-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b8a2900d685149db9af70b09b1fd9281,
title = "Motion Sickness in Automated Vehicles with Forward and Rearward Facing Seating Orientations",
abstract = "Automated vehicles (AV’s) offer greater flexibility in cabin design particularly in a future where no physical driving controls are required. One common concept for an automated vehicle is to have both forward and rearward facing seats. However, traveling backwards could lead to an increased likelihood of experiencing motion sickness due to the inability of occupants to anticipate the future motion trajectory. This study aimed to empirically evaluate the impact of seating orientation on the levels of motion sickness within an AV cabin. To this end, a vehicle was modified to replicate the common concept of automated vehicles with forward and rearward facing seats. Two routes were chosen to simulate motorway and urban driving. The participants were instructed to carry out typical office tasks whilst being driven in the vehicle which consisted of conducting a meeting, operating a personal device and taking notes. The participants conducted the test twice to experience both forward and rearward seating orientations in a randomised crossover design. Levels of sickness reported was relatively low with a significant increase in the mean level of sickness recorded when traveling rearwards. As expected, this increase was particularly pronounced under urban driving conditions. It is concluded that rearward travel in automated vehicles will compromise the passenger experience.",
keywords = "Automated vehicle, Motion sickness, Seating orientation",
author = "Spencer Salter and Cyriel Diels and Paul Herriotts and Stratis Kanarachos and Doug Thake",
note = "NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Applied Ergonomics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Applied Ergonomics, [78], (2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.02.001 {\circledC} 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.apergo.2019.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "54--61",
journal = "Applied Ergonomics",
issn = "0003-6870",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motion Sickness in Automated Vehicles with Forward and Rearward Facing Seating Orientations

AU - Salter, Spencer

AU - Diels, Cyriel

AU - Herriotts, Paul

AU - Kanarachos, Stratis

AU - Thake, Doug

N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Applied Ergonomics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Applied Ergonomics, [78], (2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.02.001 © 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - Automated vehicles (AV’s) offer greater flexibility in cabin design particularly in a future where no physical driving controls are required. One common concept for an automated vehicle is to have both forward and rearward facing seats. However, traveling backwards could lead to an increased likelihood of experiencing motion sickness due to the inability of occupants to anticipate the future motion trajectory. This study aimed to empirically evaluate the impact of seating orientation on the levels of motion sickness within an AV cabin. To this end, a vehicle was modified to replicate the common concept of automated vehicles with forward and rearward facing seats. Two routes were chosen to simulate motorway and urban driving. The participants were instructed to carry out typical office tasks whilst being driven in the vehicle which consisted of conducting a meeting, operating a personal device and taking notes. The participants conducted the test twice to experience both forward and rearward seating orientations in a randomised crossover design. Levels of sickness reported was relatively low with a significant increase in the mean level of sickness recorded when traveling rearwards. As expected, this increase was particularly pronounced under urban driving conditions. It is concluded that rearward travel in automated vehicles will compromise the passenger experience.

AB - Automated vehicles (AV’s) offer greater flexibility in cabin design particularly in a future where no physical driving controls are required. One common concept for an automated vehicle is to have both forward and rearward facing seats. However, traveling backwards could lead to an increased likelihood of experiencing motion sickness due to the inability of occupants to anticipate the future motion trajectory. This study aimed to empirically evaluate the impact of seating orientation on the levels of motion sickness within an AV cabin. To this end, a vehicle was modified to replicate the common concept of automated vehicles with forward and rearward facing seats. Two routes were chosen to simulate motorway and urban driving. The participants were instructed to carry out typical office tasks whilst being driven in the vehicle which consisted of conducting a meeting, operating a personal device and taking notes. The participants conducted the test twice to experience both forward and rearward seating orientations in a randomised crossover design. Levels of sickness reported was relatively low with a significant increase in the mean level of sickness recorded when traveling rearwards. As expected, this increase was particularly pronounced under urban driving conditions. It is concluded that rearward travel in automated vehicles will compromise the passenger experience.

KW - Automated vehicle

KW - Motion sickness

KW - Seating orientation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061727596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.02.001

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 54

EP - 61

JO - Applied Ergonomics

JF - Applied Ergonomics

SN - 0003-6870

ER -