More Harm than Good? A Pilot of a Motivational Interviewing Based Intervention for Increasing Readiness to Improve Nutrition in Young People Experiencing a First Episode of Psychosis

Emmie Fulton, Malcolm Peet, Kevin Williamson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The relationship between nutrition and mental health, as well as physical health, is well known. Mental Health Services in the UK and worldwide are recognising the need for nutritional care, however eliciting a change in eating habits in patients/service users is a challenge. The effects of a ‘Psych-Nutritional Intervention’ (PNI) using Motivational Interviewing (n = 30) was compared with a ‘Treatment as Usual’ (TAU) involving standard nutritional advice (n = 21) and a control group (no nutritional support) (n = 22). The sample consisted of young people aged 18–35 years old with a diagnosis of psychosis, who were currently
under the care of a UK specialist National Health Service (NHS) Mental Health team (Early Intervention for Psychosis Team). Nutritional knowledge was assessed at baseline across the groups. Readiness to Change eating habits was measured at baseline and a further two time points post intervention. Although there were no significant between group differences, the PNI group elicited both the most progression in terms of readiness to change eating habits, but also the most regression. The use of MI may be anti-therapeutic for those who are not ready to consider make changes to their eating habits, and this requires further
investigation. Greater emphasis on the importance of assessing and selecting who is most likely to benefit from interventions is necessary.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Psychology Bulletin
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Motivational Interviewing
Feeding Behavior
Psychotic Disorders
Mental Health
Nutritional Support
National Health Programs
Mental Health Services
Control Groups
Health
Therapeutics

Bibliographical note

Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Keywords

  • Eating habits
  • Healthy eating
  • Psychosis
  • Mental health
  • Motivational Interviewing

Cite this

@article{05a700248f5b498892c48d933ef1b2b2,
title = "More Harm than Good? A Pilot of a Motivational Interviewing Based Intervention for Increasing Readiness to Improve Nutrition in Young People Experiencing a First Episode of Psychosis",
abstract = "The relationship between nutrition and mental health, as well as physical health, is well known. Mental Health Services in the UK and worldwide are recognising the need for nutritional care, however eliciting a change in eating habits in patients/service users is a challenge. The effects of a ‘Psych-Nutritional Intervention’ (PNI) using Motivational Interviewing (n = 30) was compared with a ‘Treatment as Usual’ (TAU) involving standard nutritional advice (n = 21) and a control group (no nutritional support) (n = 22). The sample consisted of young people aged 18–35 years old with a diagnosis of psychosis, who were currentlyunder the care of a UK specialist National Health Service (NHS) Mental Health team (Early Intervention for Psychosis Team). Nutritional knowledge was assessed at baseline across the groups. Readiness to Change eating habits was measured at baseline and a further two time points post intervention. Although there were no significant between group differences, the PNI group elicited both the most progression in terms of readiness to change eating habits, but also the most regression. The use of MI may be anti-therapeutic for those who are not ready to consider make changes to their eating habits, and this requires furtherinvestigation. Greater emphasis on the importance of assessing and selecting who is most likely to benefit from interventions is necessary.",
keywords = "Eating habits, Healthy eating, Psychosis, Mental health, Motivational Interviewing",
author = "Emmie Fulton and Malcolm Peet and Kevin Williamson",
note = "Copyright: {\circledC} 2019 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.5334/hpb.10",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Health Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "2398-5941",
publisher = "Ubiquity Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - More Harm than Good? A Pilot of a Motivational Interviewing Based Intervention for Increasing Readiness to Improve Nutrition in Young People Experiencing a First Episode of Psychosis

AU - Fulton, Emmie

AU - Peet, Malcolm

AU - Williamson, Kevin

N1 - Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PY - 2019/1/2

Y1 - 2019/1/2

N2 - The relationship between nutrition and mental health, as well as physical health, is well known. Mental Health Services in the UK and worldwide are recognising the need for nutritional care, however eliciting a change in eating habits in patients/service users is a challenge. The effects of a ‘Psych-Nutritional Intervention’ (PNI) using Motivational Interviewing (n = 30) was compared with a ‘Treatment as Usual’ (TAU) involving standard nutritional advice (n = 21) and a control group (no nutritional support) (n = 22). The sample consisted of young people aged 18–35 years old with a diagnosis of psychosis, who were currentlyunder the care of a UK specialist National Health Service (NHS) Mental Health team (Early Intervention for Psychosis Team). Nutritional knowledge was assessed at baseline across the groups. Readiness to Change eating habits was measured at baseline and a further two time points post intervention. Although there were no significant between group differences, the PNI group elicited both the most progression in terms of readiness to change eating habits, but also the most regression. The use of MI may be anti-therapeutic for those who are not ready to consider make changes to their eating habits, and this requires furtherinvestigation. Greater emphasis on the importance of assessing and selecting who is most likely to benefit from interventions is necessary.

AB - The relationship between nutrition and mental health, as well as physical health, is well known. Mental Health Services in the UK and worldwide are recognising the need for nutritional care, however eliciting a change in eating habits in patients/service users is a challenge. The effects of a ‘Psych-Nutritional Intervention’ (PNI) using Motivational Interviewing (n = 30) was compared with a ‘Treatment as Usual’ (TAU) involving standard nutritional advice (n = 21) and a control group (no nutritional support) (n = 22). The sample consisted of young people aged 18–35 years old with a diagnosis of psychosis, who were currentlyunder the care of a UK specialist National Health Service (NHS) Mental Health team (Early Intervention for Psychosis Team). Nutritional knowledge was assessed at baseline across the groups. Readiness to Change eating habits was measured at baseline and a further two time points post intervention. Although there were no significant between group differences, the PNI group elicited both the most progression in terms of readiness to change eating habits, but also the most regression. The use of MI may be anti-therapeutic for those who are not ready to consider make changes to their eating habits, and this requires furtherinvestigation. Greater emphasis on the importance of assessing and selecting who is most likely to benefit from interventions is necessary.

KW - Eating habits

KW - Healthy eating

KW - Psychosis

KW - Mental health

KW - Motivational Interviewing

U2 - 10.5334/hpb.10

DO - 10.5334/hpb.10

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Health Psychology Bulletin

JF - Health Psychology Bulletin

SN - 2398-5941

IS - 1

ER -