Moderation without Change: The Strategic Transformation of Sinn Féin and the IRA in Northern Ireland

Matthew Whiting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines how violent separatist groups moderate. Using the case of Sinn Féin and the IRA in Northern Ireland, it shows that moderation is a multidimensional process, entailing a change in strategic behaviour but not necessarily in the goals or values of a separatist group. For Irish republicans, moderation entailed giving up violent revolution and embracing peaceful reformism, but it did not require changing long-term goals, accepting the legitimacy of British rule in Northern Ireland, or distancing themselves from their history of armed struggle. Moderation was possible because both Irish republicans and the British state distinguished between republicans’ strategic behaviour and their political goals, with the British state neither expecting nor demanding a change in the goals of republicanism, and republicans showing a willingness to change tactics to bring them closer to their long-term goal of a united Ireland. This finding has important implications for the moderation of other radical separatist groups.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)(in press)
JournalGovernment and Opposition
Volume(in press)
Early online date1 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

reformism
republicanism
political goal
Group
tactics
Ireland
legitimacy
history
Values

Keywords

  • moderation
  • radicalism
  • power-sharing
  • Northern Ireland
  • separatism

Cite this

Moderation without Change: The Strategic Transformation of Sinn Féin and the IRA in Northern Ireland. / Whiting, Matthew.

In: Government and Opposition, Vol. (in press), 2017, p. (in press).

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f25f02a90fec42448e932f3a4aaa1d0d,
title = "Moderation without Change: The Strategic Transformation of Sinn F{\'e}in and the IRA in Northern Ireland",
abstract = "This article examines how violent separatist groups moderate. Using the case of Sinn F{\'e}in and the IRA in Northern Ireland, it shows that moderation is a multidimensional process, entailing a change in strategic behaviour but not necessarily in the goals or values of a separatist group. For Irish republicans, moderation entailed giving up violent revolution and embracing peaceful reformism, but it did not require changing long-term goals, accepting the legitimacy of British rule in Northern Ireland, or distancing themselves from their history of armed struggle. Moderation was possible because both Irish republicans and the British state distinguished between republicans’ strategic behaviour and their political goals, with the British state neither expecting nor demanding a change in the goals of republicanism, and republicans showing a willingness to change tactics to bring them closer to their long-term goal of a united Ireland. This finding has important implications for the moderation of other radical separatist groups.",
keywords = "moderation, radicalism, power-sharing, Northern Ireland, separatism",
author = "Matthew Whiting",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1017/gov.2016.19",
language = "English",
volume = "(in press)",
pages = "(in press)",
journal = "Government and Opposition",
issn = "0017-257X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moderation without Change: The Strategic Transformation of Sinn Féin and the IRA in Northern Ireland

AU - Whiting, Matthew

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article examines how violent separatist groups moderate. Using the case of Sinn Féin and the IRA in Northern Ireland, it shows that moderation is a multidimensional process, entailing a change in strategic behaviour but not necessarily in the goals or values of a separatist group. For Irish republicans, moderation entailed giving up violent revolution and embracing peaceful reformism, but it did not require changing long-term goals, accepting the legitimacy of British rule in Northern Ireland, or distancing themselves from their history of armed struggle. Moderation was possible because both Irish republicans and the British state distinguished between republicans’ strategic behaviour and their political goals, with the British state neither expecting nor demanding a change in the goals of republicanism, and republicans showing a willingness to change tactics to bring them closer to their long-term goal of a united Ireland. This finding has important implications for the moderation of other radical separatist groups.

AB - This article examines how violent separatist groups moderate. Using the case of Sinn Féin and the IRA in Northern Ireland, it shows that moderation is a multidimensional process, entailing a change in strategic behaviour but not necessarily in the goals or values of a separatist group. For Irish republicans, moderation entailed giving up violent revolution and embracing peaceful reformism, but it did not require changing long-term goals, accepting the legitimacy of British rule in Northern Ireland, or distancing themselves from their history of armed struggle. Moderation was possible because both Irish republicans and the British state distinguished between republicans’ strategic behaviour and their political goals, with the British state neither expecting nor demanding a change in the goals of republicanism, and republicans showing a willingness to change tactics to bring them closer to their long-term goal of a united Ireland. This finding has important implications for the moderation of other radical separatist groups.

KW - moderation

KW - radicalism

KW - power-sharing

KW - Northern Ireland

KW - separatism

U2 - 10.1017/gov.2016.19

DO - 10.1017/gov.2016.19

M3 - Article

VL - (in press)

SP - (in press)

JO - Government and Opposition

JF - Government and Opposition

SN - 0017-257X

ER -