Models in Fluvial Geomorphology

Marco J. Van De Wiel, Yannick Y. Rousseau, Stephen E. Darby

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Models are conceptions of physical reality which can be employed to produce qualitative or quantitative predictions. Due to the complexity of natural systems, and gaps in our knowledge, the development of a model involves simplifying this physical reality to a form that fits the available resources and permits prediction of the phenomenon (ASCE Task Committee 1998). It is these models of restructured reality that are actually used and, as a general premise, there is often a discrepancy between physical reality (the ‘problem’) and the model. It is therefore incumbent on potential users to judge if in fact the model can provide predictions that are accurate enough to solve their particular problem. The primary aim of this chapter is to provide the information and guidance necessary to help users in making this judgement. The specific contents and scope of this chapter in relation to this aim are described at the end of this introduction. However, it is initially helpful to recognise the different motives of the various individuals who have formulated the fluvial geomorphological models that have been published and used by practitioners.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTools in Fluvial Geomorphology, 2nd Edition
EditorsMatt G. Kondolf, Herve Piegay
Place of PublicationChichester, UK
PublisherWiley
Pages383-411
Number of pages28
Edition2
ISBN (Print)978-0-470-68405-4
Publication statusPublished - May 2016

Fingerprint

fluvial geomorphology
prediction
resource

Bibliographical note

The full text is not available on the repository.

Cite this

Van De Wiel, M. J., Rousseau, Y. Y., & Darby, S. E. (2016). Models in Fluvial Geomorphology. In M. G. Kondolf, & H. Piegay (Eds.), Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, 2nd Edition (2 ed., pp. 383-411). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Models in Fluvial Geomorphology. / Van De Wiel, Marco J.; Rousseau, Yannick Y.; Darby, Stephen E.

Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, 2nd Edition. ed. / Matt G. Kondolf; Herve Piegay. 2. ed. Chichester, UK : Wiley, 2016. p. 383-411.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Van De Wiel, MJ, Rousseau, YY & Darby, SE 2016, Models in Fluvial Geomorphology. in MG Kondolf & H Piegay (eds), Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, 2nd Edition. 2 edn, Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 383-411.
Van De Wiel MJ, Rousseau YY, Darby SE. Models in Fluvial Geomorphology. In Kondolf MG, Piegay H, editors, Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, 2nd Edition. 2 ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley. 2016. p. 383-411
Van De Wiel, Marco J. ; Rousseau, Yannick Y. ; Darby, Stephen E. / Models in Fluvial Geomorphology. Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, 2nd Edition. editor / Matt G. Kondolf ; Herve Piegay. 2. ed. Chichester, UK : Wiley, 2016. pp. 383-411
@inbook{2463a5c3a87c4cfd8ae66e01dcee5ea1,
title = "Models in Fluvial Geomorphology",
abstract = "Models are conceptions of physical reality which can be employed to produce qualitative or quantitative predictions. Due to the complexity of natural systems, and gaps in our knowledge, the development of a model involves simplifying this physical reality to a form that fits the available resources and permits prediction of the phenomenon (ASCE Task Committee 1998). It is these models of restructured reality that are actually used and, as a general premise, there is often a discrepancy between physical reality (the ‘problem’) and the model. It is therefore incumbent on potential users to judge if in fact the model can provide predictions that are accurate enough to solve their particular problem. The primary aim of this chapter is to provide the information and guidance necessary to help users in making this judgement. The specific contents and scope of this chapter in relation to this aim are described at the end of this introduction. However, it is initially helpful to recognise the different motives of the various individuals who have formulated the fluvial geomorphological models that have been published and used by practitioners.",
author = "{Van De Wiel}, {Marco J.} and Rousseau, {Yannick Y.} and Darby, {Stephen E.}",
note = "The full text is not available on the repository.",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-470-68405-4",
pages = "383--411",
editor = "Kondolf, {Matt G.} and Herve Piegay",
booktitle = "Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, 2nd Edition",
publisher = "Wiley",
address = "Germany",
edition = "2",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Models in Fluvial Geomorphology

AU - Van De Wiel, Marco J.

AU - Rousseau, Yannick Y.

AU - Darby, Stephen E.

N1 - The full text is not available on the repository.

PY - 2016/5

Y1 - 2016/5

N2 - Models are conceptions of physical reality which can be employed to produce qualitative or quantitative predictions. Due to the complexity of natural systems, and gaps in our knowledge, the development of a model involves simplifying this physical reality to a form that fits the available resources and permits prediction of the phenomenon (ASCE Task Committee 1998). It is these models of restructured reality that are actually used and, as a general premise, there is often a discrepancy between physical reality (the ‘problem’) and the model. It is therefore incumbent on potential users to judge if in fact the model can provide predictions that are accurate enough to solve their particular problem. The primary aim of this chapter is to provide the information and guidance necessary to help users in making this judgement. The specific contents and scope of this chapter in relation to this aim are described at the end of this introduction. However, it is initially helpful to recognise the different motives of the various individuals who have formulated the fluvial geomorphological models that have been published and used by practitioners.

AB - Models are conceptions of physical reality which can be employed to produce qualitative or quantitative predictions. Due to the complexity of natural systems, and gaps in our knowledge, the development of a model involves simplifying this physical reality to a form that fits the available resources and permits prediction of the phenomenon (ASCE Task Committee 1998). It is these models of restructured reality that are actually used and, as a general premise, there is often a discrepancy between physical reality (the ‘problem’) and the model. It is therefore incumbent on potential users to judge if in fact the model can provide predictions that are accurate enough to solve their particular problem. The primary aim of this chapter is to provide the information and guidance necessary to help users in making this judgement. The specific contents and scope of this chapter in relation to this aim are described at the end of this introduction. However, it is initially helpful to recognise the different motives of the various individuals who have formulated the fluvial geomorphological models that have been published and used by practitioners.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-0-470-68405-4

SP - 383

EP - 411

BT - Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, 2nd Edition

A2 - Kondolf, Matt G.

A2 - Piegay, Herve

PB - Wiley

CY - Chichester, UK

ER -