Model-to-Decision Approach for Autonomous Vehicle Convoy Collision Ethics

James Pickering, Patricia Ashman, Alexander Gillbert, Dobrila Petrovic, Kevin Warwick, Keith Burnham

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The introduction of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is expected to reduce the number of road traffic accidents; however, it is expected that this will not be completely without incidents. In the event of AV incidents, ethical decisions will need to be made, e.g. a decision between colliding into one of three different AVs ahead on a multiple lane highway. A possible solution to the ethical problem is known as the utilitarian approach; this involves the AV steering into the collision path of least loss of utility, e.g. lowest injury level or number of fatalities. Deciding on the collision outcome of such ethical problems involves the investigation of a model-to-decision (M2D) approach. Thus, using a mathematical model of the collision scenarios to then make decisions based on the severity of each outcome as a measure of utility loss. This research investigates the use of such an approach for AVs in convoy on a three-lane highway. The mathematical model of an AV convoy collision that has been developed is of a nonlinear (bilinear) lumped mass spring configuration. This model is used in conjunction with a pragmatic multi-criteria decision maker (MCDM). The results from the M2D approach highlight the effectiveness of the utilisation approach on-board future AVs to minimise utility loss in terms of the severity of road traffic injuries and/or number of fatalities.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL)
PublisherIEEE
Pages301-308
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)9781538628645
ISBN (Print)9781509064113
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Sep 2018
Event2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL): UKACC 2018 - Sheffield, United Kingdom
Duration: 5 Sep 20187 Sep 2018
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8491726

Conference

Conference2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL)
CountryUnited Kingdom
CitySheffield
Period5/09/187/09/18
Internet address

Fingerprint

Highway accidents
Mathematical models

Keywords

  • Autonomous Vehicle
  • Model-to-Decision
  • Machine
  • Ethics
  • Nonlinear Collision Modelling
  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making

Cite this

Pickering, J., Ashman, P., Gillbert, A., Petrovic, D., Warwick, K., & Burnham, K. (2018). Model-to-Decision Approach for Autonomous Vehicle Convoy Collision Ethics. In 2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL) (pp. 301-308). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONTROL.2018.8516846

Model-to-Decision Approach for Autonomous Vehicle Convoy Collision Ethics. / Pickering, James; Ashman, Patricia; Gillbert, Alexander; Petrovic, Dobrila; Warwick, Kevin; Burnham, Keith .

2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL). IEEE, 2018. p. 301-308.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Pickering, J, Ashman, P, Gillbert, A, Petrovic, D, Warwick, K & Burnham, K 2018, Model-to-Decision Approach for Autonomous Vehicle Convoy Collision Ethics. in 2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL). IEEE, pp. 301-308, 2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL), Sheffield, United Kingdom, 5/09/18. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONTROL.2018.8516846
Pickering J, Ashman P, Gillbert A, Petrovic D, Warwick K, Burnham K. Model-to-Decision Approach for Autonomous Vehicle Convoy Collision Ethics. In 2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL). IEEE. 2018. p. 301-308 https://doi.org/10.1109/CONTROL.2018.8516846
Pickering, James ; Ashman, Patricia ; Gillbert, Alexander ; Petrovic, Dobrila ; Warwick, Kevin ; Burnham, Keith . / Model-to-Decision Approach for Autonomous Vehicle Convoy Collision Ethics. 2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL). IEEE, 2018. pp. 301-308
@inbook{081487f611bc4d46ae200aabc1da4a41,
title = "Model-to-Decision Approach for Autonomous Vehicle Convoy Collision Ethics",
abstract = "The introduction of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is expected to reduce the number of road traffic accidents; however, it is expected that this will not be completely without incidents. In the event of AV incidents, ethical decisions will need to be made, e.g. a decision between colliding into one of three different AVs ahead on a multiple lane highway. A possible solution to the ethical problem is known as the utilitarian approach; this involves the AV steering into the collision path of least loss of utility, e.g. lowest injury level or number of fatalities. Deciding on the collision outcome of such ethical problems involves the investigation of a model-to-decision (M2D) approach. Thus, using a mathematical model of the collision scenarios to then make decisions based on the severity of each outcome as a measure of utility loss. This research investigates the use of such an approach for AVs in convoy on a three-lane highway. The mathematical model of an AV convoy collision that has been developed is of a nonlinear (bilinear) lumped mass spring configuration. This model is used in conjunction with a pragmatic multi-criteria decision maker (MCDM). The results from the M2D approach highlight the effectiveness of the utilisation approach on-board future AVs to minimise utility loss in terms of the severity of road traffic injuries and/or number of fatalities.",
keywords = "Autonomous Vehicle, Model-to-Decision, Machine, Ethics, Nonlinear Collision Modelling, Multi-Criteria Decision Making",
author = "James Pickering and Patricia Ashman and Alexander Gillbert and Dobrila Petrovic and Kevin Warwick and Keith Burnham",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1109/CONTROL.2018.8516846",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781509064113",
pages = "301--308",
booktitle = "2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL)",
publisher = "IEEE",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Model-to-Decision Approach for Autonomous Vehicle Convoy Collision Ethics

AU - Pickering, James

AU - Ashman, Patricia

AU - Gillbert, Alexander

AU - Petrovic, Dobrila

AU - Warwick, Kevin

AU - Burnham, Keith

PY - 2018/9/5

Y1 - 2018/9/5

N2 - The introduction of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is expected to reduce the number of road traffic accidents; however, it is expected that this will not be completely without incidents. In the event of AV incidents, ethical decisions will need to be made, e.g. a decision between colliding into one of three different AVs ahead on a multiple lane highway. A possible solution to the ethical problem is known as the utilitarian approach; this involves the AV steering into the collision path of least loss of utility, e.g. lowest injury level or number of fatalities. Deciding on the collision outcome of such ethical problems involves the investigation of a model-to-decision (M2D) approach. Thus, using a mathematical model of the collision scenarios to then make decisions based on the severity of each outcome as a measure of utility loss. This research investigates the use of such an approach for AVs in convoy on a three-lane highway. The mathematical model of an AV convoy collision that has been developed is of a nonlinear (bilinear) lumped mass spring configuration. This model is used in conjunction with a pragmatic multi-criteria decision maker (MCDM). The results from the M2D approach highlight the effectiveness of the utilisation approach on-board future AVs to minimise utility loss in terms of the severity of road traffic injuries and/or number of fatalities.

AB - The introduction of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is expected to reduce the number of road traffic accidents; however, it is expected that this will not be completely without incidents. In the event of AV incidents, ethical decisions will need to be made, e.g. a decision between colliding into one of three different AVs ahead on a multiple lane highway. A possible solution to the ethical problem is known as the utilitarian approach; this involves the AV steering into the collision path of least loss of utility, e.g. lowest injury level or number of fatalities. Deciding on the collision outcome of such ethical problems involves the investigation of a model-to-decision (M2D) approach. Thus, using a mathematical model of the collision scenarios to then make decisions based on the severity of each outcome as a measure of utility loss. This research investigates the use of such an approach for AVs in convoy on a three-lane highway. The mathematical model of an AV convoy collision that has been developed is of a nonlinear (bilinear) lumped mass spring configuration. This model is used in conjunction with a pragmatic multi-criteria decision maker (MCDM). The results from the M2D approach highlight the effectiveness of the utilisation approach on-board future AVs to minimise utility loss in terms of the severity of road traffic injuries and/or number of fatalities.

KW - Autonomous Vehicle

KW - Model-to-Decision

KW - Machine

KW - Ethics

KW - Nonlinear Collision Modelling

KW - Multi-Criteria Decision Making

U2 - 10.1109/CONTROL.2018.8516846

DO - 10.1109/CONTROL.2018.8516846

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781509064113

SP - 301

EP - 308

BT - 2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL)

PB - IEEE

ER -