Micro Moral Worlds of Contentious Politics: A Reconceptualization of Radical Groups and Their Intersections with One Another and the Mainstream

Joel Busher, John Morrison

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)
    24 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The emergence, or resurgence, of radical political groups invariably provokes a struggle between activists, academics, commentators and policymakers over the particular configuration of nouns and adjectives that best correspond to the group in question. While such debates are an integral part of political practice, scrutiny of the claims made within these debates reveals significant limitations in standard strategies of description – most notably their inability to satisfactorily render either the essential cultural messiness and dynamism of contentious politics or the intersections between the so-called extreme and mainstream. We propose an alternative, albeit not mutually exclusive, strategy of description. This entails mapping what we call the micro moral worlds of contentious politics – the patchwork of intersubjective contexts of belief and behavior through which activism takes place. We illustrate this with two empirical cases: The English Defence League in Britain, and Republican Sinn Fein in Ireland.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)219-236
    Number of pages18
    JournalMobilization: An International Quarterly
    Volume23
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2018

    Keywords

    • extremism
    • radicalism
    • categorization
    • definition
    • social movements

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Micro Moral Worlds of Contentious Politics: A Reconceptualization of Radical Groups and Their Intersections with One Another and the Mainstream'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this