Abstract
Comments on Mercer v Alternative Future Group Ltd (EAT) on whether a tribunal failed in its duty under the Human Rights Act 1998 s.3 to treat the claimant's suspension from work for organising strikes as a "detriment" within the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.146.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 111 -116 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Coventry Law Journal |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Jul 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mercer v Alternative Future Group Ltd: human rights - freedom of assembly - right to strike - action short of dismissal - statutory interpretation - Human Rights Act 1998'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS