Mega-sport events, micro and small business leveraging: Introducing the ‘MSE-MSB Leverage Model’

Seth Kirby, Mike Duignan, David McGillivray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Micro and small business (MSB) interests legitimise mega-sport event (MSE) candidature bids. Yet, MSB interests can be side-lined in the event lead up, live staging, and legacy periods. This article provides a detailed: i) review of MSE impacts on existing MSBs residing within targeted host communities, ii) conceptual and practical examination of MSE leveraging opportunities, iii) synthesis of good inclusionary practices identified in previous MSE case studies. As a result, a series of general and specific ways MSEs can foster MSB leveraging and legitimise local interests are suggested. We present a comprehensive analysis of key works since mid-1990s related to the themes identified above. Our analysis identifies that limited conceptual and empirical research exists examining MSB impact and leveraging activities in the context of MSEs, yet significant evidence points to negative experiences, disruption and displacement effects on residential (host) communities. We purposively focus on good practice in the context of other MSEs from the Olympics Games (e.g. London 2012, Rio 2016) and FIFA World Cup (e.g. South Africa, 2010) to inform recommendations and managerial implications. We outline a systematic series of ways MSBs can be structurally excluded from accessing MSE leveraging opportunities. Building on Chalip’s (2004) widely adopted Event Leverage Model (ELM), we present the “MSE-MSB Leverage Model” to illustrate how MSEs can (re)position MSBs as legitimate stakeholders: to support greater leveraging opportunities, and better (re)distribute event benefits back into host communities across planning and delivery stages. These range from reconfiguring: i) event planning principles and policies, ii) regulatory and trading environments, iii) and the development of MSB business-to-business networks and partnerships.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)917-931
Number of pages15
JournalEvent Management
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

sport
Leverage
Micro businesses
Small business
Sports events
Olympic Games
stakeholder
Good practice

Bibliographical note

Published as: Kirby, Seth I., Michael B. Duignan, and David McGillivray. "Mega-Sport Events, Micro and Small Business Leveraging: Introducing the." Event Management 22.6 (2018): 917-931. (c) Cognizant Communication

Keywords

  • Host community
  • Mega-sporting events
  • Micro and small producers
  • Leveraging
  • Event management
  • Event planning and policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Cite this

Mega-sport events, micro and small business leveraging: Introducing the ‘MSE-MSB Leverage Model’. / Kirby, Seth; Duignan, Mike; McGillivray, David.

In: Event Management, Vol. 22, No. 6, 13.12.2018, p. 917-931.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bf97d41cc53d48fd9655b906033b66c5,
title = "Mega-sport events, micro and small business leveraging: Introducing the ‘MSE-MSB Leverage Model’",
abstract = "Micro and small business (MSB) interests legitimise mega-sport event (MSE) candidature bids. Yet, MSB interests can be side-lined in the event lead up, live staging, and legacy periods. This article provides a detailed: i) review of MSE impacts on existing MSBs residing within targeted host communities, ii) conceptual and practical examination of MSE leveraging opportunities, iii) synthesis of good inclusionary practices identified in previous MSE case studies. As a result, a series of general and specific ways MSEs can foster MSB leveraging and legitimise local interests are suggested. We present a comprehensive analysis of key works since mid-1990s related to the themes identified above. Our analysis identifies that limited conceptual and empirical research exists examining MSB impact and leveraging activities in the context of MSEs, yet significant evidence points to negative experiences, disruption and displacement effects on residential (host) communities. We purposively focus on good practice in the context of other MSEs from the Olympics Games (e.g. London 2012, Rio 2016) and FIFA World Cup (e.g. South Africa, 2010) to inform recommendations and managerial implications. We outline a systematic series of ways MSBs can be structurally excluded from accessing MSE leveraging opportunities. Building on Chalip’s (2004) widely adopted Event Leverage Model (ELM), we present the “MSE-MSB Leverage Model” to illustrate how MSEs can (re)position MSBs as legitimate stakeholders: to support greater leveraging opportunities, and better (re)distribute event benefits back into host communities across planning and delivery stages. These range from reconfiguring: i) event planning principles and policies, ii) regulatory and trading environments, iii) and the development of MSB business-to-business networks and partnerships.",
keywords = "Host community, Mega-sporting events, Micro and small producers, Leveraging, Event management, Event planning and policy",
author = "Seth Kirby and Mike Duignan and David McGillivray",
note = "Published as: Kirby, Seth I., Michael B. Duignan, and David McGillivray. {"}Mega-Sport Events, Micro and Small Business Leveraging: Introducing the.{"} Event Management 22.6 (2018): 917-931. (c) Cognizant Communication",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "13",
doi = "10.3727/152599518X15346132863184",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "917--931",
journal = "Event Management",
issn = "1525-9951",
publisher = "Cognizant Communication Corporation",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mega-sport events, micro and small business leveraging: Introducing the ‘MSE-MSB Leverage Model’

AU - Kirby, Seth

AU - Duignan, Mike

AU - McGillivray, David

N1 - Published as: Kirby, Seth I., Michael B. Duignan, and David McGillivray. "Mega-Sport Events, Micro and Small Business Leveraging: Introducing the." Event Management 22.6 (2018): 917-931. (c) Cognizant Communication

PY - 2018/12/13

Y1 - 2018/12/13

N2 - Micro and small business (MSB) interests legitimise mega-sport event (MSE) candidature bids. Yet, MSB interests can be side-lined in the event lead up, live staging, and legacy periods. This article provides a detailed: i) review of MSE impacts on existing MSBs residing within targeted host communities, ii) conceptual and practical examination of MSE leveraging opportunities, iii) synthesis of good inclusionary practices identified in previous MSE case studies. As a result, a series of general and specific ways MSEs can foster MSB leveraging and legitimise local interests are suggested. We present a comprehensive analysis of key works since mid-1990s related to the themes identified above. Our analysis identifies that limited conceptual and empirical research exists examining MSB impact and leveraging activities in the context of MSEs, yet significant evidence points to negative experiences, disruption and displacement effects on residential (host) communities. We purposively focus on good practice in the context of other MSEs from the Olympics Games (e.g. London 2012, Rio 2016) and FIFA World Cup (e.g. South Africa, 2010) to inform recommendations and managerial implications. We outline a systematic series of ways MSBs can be structurally excluded from accessing MSE leveraging opportunities. Building on Chalip’s (2004) widely adopted Event Leverage Model (ELM), we present the “MSE-MSB Leverage Model” to illustrate how MSEs can (re)position MSBs as legitimate stakeholders: to support greater leveraging opportunities, and better (re)distribute event benefits back into host communities across planning and delivery stages. These range from reconfiguring: i) event planning principles and policies, ii) regulatory and trading environments, iii) and the development of MSB business-to-business networks and partnerships.

AB - Micro and small business (MSB) interests legitimise mega-sport event (MSE) candidature bids. Yet, MSB interests can be side-lined in the event lead up, live staging, and legacy periods. This article provides a detailed: i) review of MSE impacts on existing MSBs residing within targeted host communities, ii) conceptual and practical examination of MSE leveraging opportunities, iii) synthesis of good inclusionary practices identified in previous MSE case studies. As a result, a series of general and specific ways MSEs can foster MSB leveraging and legitimise local interests are suggested. We present a comprehensive analysis of key works since mid-1990s related to the themes identified above. Our analysis identifies that limited conceptual and empirical research exists examining MSB impact and leveraging activities in the context of MSEs, yet significant evidence points to negative experiences, disruption and displacement effects on residential (host) communities. We purposively focus on good practice in the context of other MSEs from the Olympics Games (e.g. London 2012, Rio 2016) and FIFA World Cup (e.g. South Africa, 2010) to inform recommendations and managerial implications. We outline a systematic series of ways MSBs can be structurally excluded from accessing MSE leveraging opportunities. Building on Chalip’s (2004) widely adopted Event Leverage Model (ELM), we present the “MSE-MSB Leverage Model” to illustrate how MSEs can (re)position MSBs as legitimate stakeholders: to support greater leveraging opportunities, and better (re)distribute event benefits back into host communities across planning and delivery stages. These range from reconfiguring: i) event planning principles and policies, ii) regulatory and trading environments, iii) and the development of MSB business-to-business networks and partnerships.

KW - Host community

KW - Mega-sporting events

KW - Micro and small producers

KW - Leveraging

KW - Event management

KW - Event planning and policy

U2 - 10.3727/152599518X15346132863184

DO - 10.3727/152599518X15346132863184

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 917

EP - 931

JO - Event Management

JF - Event Management

SN - 1525-9951

IS - 6

ER -