Mapping the meaning of ‘difference’ in Europe: A social topography of prejudice

Gill Valentine, Aneta Piekut, Aleksandra Winiarska, Catherine Harris, Lucy Jackson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper draws on original empirical research to investigate popular understandings of prejudice in two national contexts: Poland and the United Kingdom. The paper demonstrates how common-sense meanings of prejudice are inflected by the specific histories and geographies of each place: framed in terms of ‘distance’ (Poland) and ‘proximity’ (United Kingdom), respectively. Yet, by treating these national contexts as nodes and linking them analytically the paper also exposes a connectedness in these definitions which brings into relief the common processes that produce prejudice. The paper then explores how inter-linkages between the United Kingdom and Poland within the wider context of the European Union are producing – and circulating through the emerging international currency of ‘political correctness’ – a common critique of equality legislation and a belief that popular concerns about the way national contexts are perceived to be changing as a consequence of super mobility and super diversity are being silenced. This raises a real risk that in the context of European austerity and associated levels of socioeconomic insecurity, negative attitudes and conservative values may begin to be represented as popular normative standards which transcend national contexts to justify harsher political responses towards minorities. As such, the paper concludes by making a case for prejudice reduction strategies to receive much greater priority in both national and European contexts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)568-585
Number of pages18
JournalEthnicities
Volume15
Issue number4
Early online date27 Jul 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2015

Fingerprint

prejudice
geography
Poland
political correctness
currency
empirical research
equality
legislation
minority
Topography
Prejudice
history
Values

Bibliographical note

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Cite this

Mapping the meaning of ‘difference’ in Europe: A social topography of prejudice. / Valentine, Gill; Piekut, Aneta; Winiarska, Aleksandra ; Harris, Catherine; Jackson, Lucy.

In: Ethnicities, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.08.2015, p. 568-585.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valentine, Gill ; Piekut, Aneta ; Winiarska, Aleksandra ; Harris, Catherine ; Jackson, Lucy. / Mapping the meaning of ‘difference’ in Europe: A social topography of prejudice. In: Ethnicities. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 568-585.
@article{5c630020ac414d5baa293e52a61a7659,
title = "Mapping the meaning of ‘difference’ in Europe: A social topography of prejudice",
abstract = "This paper draws on original empirical research to investigate popular understandings of prejudice in two national contexts: Poland and the United Kingdom. The paper demonstrates how common-sense meanings of prejudice are inflected by the specific histories and geographies of each place: framed in terms of ‘distance’ (Poland) and ‘proximity’ (United Kingdom), respectively. Yet, by treating these national contexts as nodes and linking them analytically the paper also exposes a connectedness in these definitions which brings into relief the common processes that produce prejudice. The paper then explores how inter-linkages between the United Kingdom and Poland within the wider context of the European Union are producing – and circulating through the emerging international currency of ‘political correctness’ – a common critique of equality legislation and a belief that popular concerns about the way national contexts are perceived to be changing as a consequence of super mobility and super diversity are being silenced. This raises a real risk that in the context of European austerity and associated levels of socioeconomic insecurity, negative attitudes and conservative values may begin to be represented as popular normative standards which transcend national contexts to justify harsher political responses towards minorities. As such, the paper concludes by making a case for prejudice reduction strategies to receive much greater priority in both national and European contexts.",
author = "Gill Valentine and Aneta Piekut and Aleksandra Winiarska and Catherine Harris and Lucy Jackson",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1468796815577982",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "568--585",
journal = "Ethnicities",
issn = "1468-7968",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping the meaning of ‘difference’ in Europe: A social topography of prejudice

AU - Valentine, Gill

AU - Piekut, Aneta

AU - Winiarska, Aleksandra

AU - Harris, Catherine

AU - Jackson, Lucy

N1 - Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - This paper draws on original empirical research to investigate popular understandings of prejudice in two national contexts: Poland and the United Kingdom. The paper demonstrates how common-sense meanings of prejudice are inflected by the specific histories and geographies of each place: framed in terms of ‘distance’ (Poland) and ‘proximity’ (United Kingdom), respectively. Yet, by treating these national contexts as nodes and linking them analytically the paper also exposes a connectedness in these definitions which brings into relief the common processes that produce prejudice. The paper then explores how inter-linkages between the United Kingdom and Poland within the wider context of the European Union are producing – and circulating through the emerging international currency of ‘political correctness’ – a common critique of equality legislation and a belief that popular concerns about the way national contexts are perceived to be changing as a consequence of super mobility and super diversity are being silenced. This raises a real risk that in the context of European austerity and associated levels of socioeconomic insecurity, negative attitudes and conservative values may begin to be represented as popular normative standards which transcend national contexts to justify harsher political responses towards minorities. As such, the paper concludes by making a case for prejudice reduction strategies to receive much greater priority in both national and European contexts.

AB - This paper draws on original empirical research to investigate popular understandings of prejudice in two national contexts: Poland and the United Kingdom. The paper demonstrates how common-sense meanings of prejudice are inflected by the specific histories and geographies of each place: framed in terms of ‘distance’ (Poland) and ‘proximity’ (United Kingdom), respectively. Yet, by treating these national contexts as nodes and linking them analytically the paper also exposes a connectedness in these definitions which brings into relief the common processes that produce prejudice. The paper then explores how inter-linkages between the United Kingdom and Poland within the wider context of the European Union are producing – and circulating through the emerging international currency of ‘political correctness’ – a common critique of equality legislation and a belief that popular concerns about the way national contexts are perceived to be changing as a consequence of super mobility and super diversity are being silenced. This raises a real risk that in the context of European austerity and associated levels of socioeconomic insecurity, negative attitudes and conservative values may begin to be represented as popular normative standards which transcend national contexts to justify harsher political responses towards minorities. As such, the paper concludes by making a case for prejudice reduction strategies to receive much greater priority in both national and European contexts.

U2 - 10.1177/1468796815577982

DO - 10.1177/1468796815577982

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 568

EP - 585

JO - Ethnicities

JF - Ethnicities

SN - 1468-7968

IS - 4

ER -