Abstract
Prior research has examined how experienced fireground commanders make task related decisions under a range of unfavourable conditions, however gaps still exist in the literature when there is need to evaluate the coping strategies of incident commanders across different urban environments. There was rarely any study found to have explored cross-cultural differences that exist between two or more fire services with distinct cultural orientations. This paper reports findings from a study that compared firefighting approaches used by the UK and Nigerian firefighters. Thirty experienced officers were interviewed (UK=15, Nigeria =15) using the critical decision method, and retrospective incident reports were collected and analysed. As expected, results revealed that the UK fire service are significantly better equipped with advanced equipment compared to their Nigerian counterparts who often make improvisations using relatively unsafe methods. However, evidence was found to suggest that the Nigerian officers are culturally biased towards the use of certain firefighting equipment. The implications of these cultural differences for practice are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | ICUR 2016 Proceedings |
Subtitle of host publication | Atas ICUR2016 |
Publisher | European Centre on Urban Risks |
Pages | 531-538 |
Number of pages | 8 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-989-95094-1-2 |
Publication status | Published - 2 Jul 2016 |
Event | International Conference on Urban Risks - Lisbon, Portugal Duration: 30 Jun 2016 → 2 Jul 2016 http://www.ceru-europa.pt/icur2016/ |
Conference
Conference | International Conference on Urban Risks |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | ICURT 2016 |
Country/Territory | Portugal |
City | Lisbon |
Period | 30/06/16 → 2/07/16 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- Firefighting
- culture
- decision making
- training
- critical decision making