Making an impact in healthcare contexts: insights from a mixed-methods study of professional misconduct

R. H. Searle, Charis Rice

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    7 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The scarcity of public sector healthcare resources and the vulnerability of service users make the conduct of health professionals critically important. Health regulators, in delivering their core objective of patient protection, use empirical evidence to identify professionals’ misconduct, improve their understanding of why misconduct occurs, and to maximize the effectiveness of regulatory actions that safeguard public trust in the healthcare system. This paper outlines the contribution of comparative academic analysis of three professions in the UK (doctors, nurses & midwives, and allied health professions) based on 6714 individual cases of professional misconduct. Three dynamic strands of ongoing impact are identified: “dialogue”, that creates an international multi-stakeholder community of interest; “knowledge generation”, which advances conceptual and empirical understanding of counterproductive work behaviour through sequential quantitative and qualitative study; and “dissemination”, where practical learning is utilized by regulators, employers and other academics.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)470-481
    Number of pages12
    JournalEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
    Volume30
    Issue number4
    Early online date27 Nov 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2021

    Bibliographical note

    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology on 27/11/2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1850520

    Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

    Keywords

    • Research impact
    • applied research
    • counterproductive work behaviour
    • health
    • regulation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Applied Psychology
    • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Making an impact in healthcare contexts: insights from a mixed-methods study of professional misconduct'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this