Making an impact in healthcare contexts:: insights from a mixed-methods study of professional misconduct

R. H. Searle; Charis Rice

doi:10.1080/1359432X.2020.1850520

Making an impact in healthcare contexts: insights from a mixed-methods study of professional misconduct

R. H. Searle, Charis Rice

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The scarcity of public sector healthcare resources and the vulnerability of service users make the conduct of health professionals critically important. Health regulators, in delivering their core objective of patient protection, use empirical evidence to identify professionals’ misconduct, improve their understanding of why misconduct occurs, and to maximize the effectiveness of regulatory actions that safeguard public trust in the healthcare system. This paper outlines the contribution of comparative academic analysis of three professions in the UK (doctors, nurses & midwives, and allied health professions) based on 6714 individual cases of professional misconduct. Three dynamic strands of ongoing impact are identified: “dialogue”, that creates an international multi-stakeholder community of interest; “knowledge generation”, which advances conceptual and empirical understanding of counterproductive work behaviour through sequential quantitative and qualitative study; and “dissemination”, where practical learning is utilized by regulators, employers and other academics.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	470-481
Number of pages	12
Journal	European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Volume	30
Issue number	4
Early online date	27 Nov 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1850520
Publication status	Published - 2021

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology on 27/11/2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1850520

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Keywords

Research impact
applied research
counterproductive work behaviour
health
regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Applied Psychology
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1080/1359432X.2020.1850520

Post-PrintAccepted author manuscript, 1.72 MB

Cite this

@article{1ebd0a138dfb45008072648e861b882f,

title = "Making an impact in healthcare contexts:: insights from a mixed-methods study of professional misconduct",

abstract = "The scarcity of public sector healthcare resources and the vulnerability of service users make the conduct of health professionals critically important. Health regulators, in delivering their core objective of patient protection, use empirical evidence to identify professionals{\textquoteright} misconduct, improve their understanding of why misconduct occurs, and to maximize the effectiveness of regulatory actions that safeguard public trust in the healthcare system. This paper outlines the contribution of comparative academic analysis of three professions in the UK (doctors, nurses & midwives, and allied health professions) based on 6714 individual cases of professional misconduct. Three dynamic strands of ongoing impact are identified: “dialogue”, that creates an international multi-stakeholder community of interest; “knowledge generation”, which advances conceptual and empirical understanding of counterproductive work behaviour through sequential quantitative and qualitative study; and “dissemination”, where practical learning is utilized by regulators, employers and other academics.",

keywords = "Research impact, applied research, counterproductive work behaviour, health, regulation",

author = "Searle, {R. H.} and Charis Rice",

note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology on 27/11/2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1850520 Copyright {\textcopyright} and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. ",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1080/1359432X.2020.1850520",

language = "English",

volume = "30",

pages = "470--481",

journal = "European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology",

issn = "1359-432X",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making an impact in healthcare contexts:

T2 - insights from a mixed-methods study of professional misconduct

AU - Searle, R. H.

AU - Rice, Charis

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology on 27/11/2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1850520 Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - The scarcity of public sector healthcare resources and the vulnerability of service users make the conduct of health professionals critically important. Health regulators, in delivering their core objective of patient protection, use empirical evidence to identify professionals’ misconduct, improve their understanding of why misconduct occurs, and to maximize the effectiveness of regulatory actions that safeguard public trust in the healthcare system. This paper outlines the contribution of comparative academic analysis of three professions in the UK (doctors, nurses & midwives, and allied health professions) based on 6714 individual cases of professional misconduct. Three dynamic strands of ongoing impact are identified: “dialogue”, that creates an international multi-stakeholder community of interest; “knowledge generation”, which advances conceptual and empirical understanding of counterproductive work behaviour through sequential quantitative and qualitative study; and “dissemination”, where practical learning is utilized by regulators, employers and other academics.

AB - The scarcity of public sector healthcare resources and the vulnerability of service users make the conduct of health professionals critically important. Health regulators, in delivering their core objective of patient protection, use empirical evidence to identify professionals’ misconduct, improve their understanding of why misconduct occurs, and to maximize the effectiveness of regulatory actions that safeguard public trust in the healthcare system. This paper outlines the contribution of comparative academic analysis of three professions in the UK (doctors, nurses & midwives, and allied health professions) based on 6714 individual cases of professional misconduct. Three dynamic strands of ongoing impact are identified: “dialogue”, that creates an international multi-stakeholder community of interest; “knowledge generation”, which advances conceptual and empirical understanding of counterproductive work behaviour through sequential quantitative and qualitative study; and “dissemination”, where practical learning is utilized by regulators, employers and other academics.

KW - Research impact

KW - applied research

KW - counterproductive work behaviour

KW - health

KW - regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096868212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1359432X.2020.1850520

DO - 10.1080/1359432X.2020.1850520

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 470

EP - 481

JO - European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

JF - European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

SN - 1359-432X

IS - 4

ER -