Machine humour: examples from Turing test experiments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we look at the possibility of a machine having a sense of humour. In particular, we focus on actual machine utterances in Turing test discourses. In doing so, we do not consider the Turing test in depth and what this might mean for humanity, rather we merely look at cases in conversations when the output from a machine can be considered to be humorous. We link such outpourings with Turing’s “arguments from various disabilities” used against the concept of a machine being able to think, taken from his seminal work of 1950. Finally we consider the role that humour might play in adding to the deception, integral to the Turing test, that a machine in practice appears to be a human.
LanguageEnglish
Pages553-561
JournalAI & Society
Volume32
Issue number4
Early online date7 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Experiments
Turing Test
Experiment
Sense of Humor
Discourse
Deception
Utterance

Bibliographical note

Due to publisher policy, the full text is not available on the repository until the 7th of June 2017.

This article is currently in press. Full citation details will be uploaded when available.
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0669-0

Keywords

  • Deception detection
  • Natural language
  • Turing’s imitation game
  • Chatbots
  • Machine humour

Cite this

Machine humour: examples from Turing test experiments. / Warwick, Kevin; Shah, Huma.

In: AI & Society, Vol. 32, No. 4, 11.2017, p. 553-561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{63555d4c2b7346df8cb2a259978ace7d,
title = "Machine humour: examples from Turing test experiments",
abstract = "In this paper, we look at the possibility of a machine having a sense of humour. In particular, we focus on actual machine utterances in Turing test discourses. In doing so, we do not consider the Turing test in depth and what this might mean for humanity, rather we merely look at cases in conversations when the output from a machine can be considered to be humorous. We link such outpourings with Turing’s “arguments from various disabilities” used against the concept of a machine being able to think, taken from his seminal work of 1950. Finally we consider the role that humour might play in adding to the deception, integral to the Turing test, that a machine in practice appears to be a human.",
keywords = "Deception detection, Natural language, Turing’s imitation game, Chatbots, Machine humour",
author = "Kevin Warwick and Huma Shah",
note = "Due to publisher policy, the full text is not available on the repository until the 7th of June 2017. This article is currently in press. Full citation details will be uploaded when available. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0669-0",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s00146-016-0669-0",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "553--561",
journal = "AI & Society",
issn = "0951-5666",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Machine humour: examples from Turing test experiments

AU - Warwick, Kevin

AU - Shah, Huma

N1 - Due to publisher policy, the full text is not available on the repository until the 7th of June 2017. This article is currently in press. Full citation details will be uploaded when available. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0669-0

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - In this paper, we look at the possibility of a machine having a sense of humour. In particular, we focus on actual machine utterances in Turing test discourses. In doing so, we do not consider the Turing test in depth and what this might mean for humanity, rather we merely look at cases in conversations when the output from a machine can be considered to be humorous. We link such outpourings with Turing’s “arguments from various disabilities” used against the concept of a machine being able to think, taken from his seminal work of 1950. Finally we consider the role that humour might play in adding to the deception, integral to the Turing test, that a machine in practice appears to be a human.

AB - In this paper, we look at the possibility of a machine having a sense of humour. In particular, we focus on actual machine utterances in Turing test discourses. In doing so, we do not consider the Turing test in depth and what this might mean for humanity, rather we merely look at cases in conversations when the output from a machine can be considered to be humorous. We link such outpourings with Turing’s “arguments from various disabilities” used against the concept of a machine being able to think, taken from his seminal work of 1950. Finally we consider the role that humour might play in adding to the deception, integral to the Turing test, that a machine in practice appears to be a human.

KW - Deception detection

KW - Natural language

KW - Turing’s imitation game

KW - Chatbots

KW - Machine humour

U2 - 10.1007/s00146-016-0669-0

DO - 10.1007/s00146-016-0669-0

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 553

EP - 561

JO - AI & Society

T2 - AI & Society

JF - AI & Society

SN - 0951-5666

IS - 4

ER -