Localising activity within the context of relational complexity: Exploring the relevance of rural centre and town centre conceptions

Neil Adrian Powe, David Bek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The planning practice of focusing most rural development within larger settlements has failed to achieve goals of rural activity colocation. In a society where quality of opportunity has become dominant in location decisions, a broader imaginative perspective than the physical proximity of functions is required if meaningful activity colocation is to occur. The extent to which residents and employees can be encouraged to localise their activity is explored through case studies of three very different small towns within the English county of Norfolk. Although not of universal appeal, small towns provide an important niche for many rural actors. Rather than abandoning policy endeavours, there is potential to improve their effectiveness by ensuring that the possible benefits arising from the colocation of activity are realised. By adopting a more flexible approach to policy application, utilising complementary conceptions which are attentive to the specific characteristics of individual places, potential exceptions to policies of development concentration can be identified. However, in the UK context ongoing cutbacks in local authority budgets are likely to prejudice the conduct of the type of fine-grained local policy development required to achieve these objectives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)501-517
Number of pages17
JournalEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design
Volume39
Issue number3
Early online date1 Jan 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

town
small town
location decision
planning practice
policy development
rural development
niche
prejudice
Personnel
development policy
Planning
appeal
budget
employee
resident
policy
society
county
local authority

Keywords

  • Activity colocation
  • Localising activity
  • Rural centre
  • Small towns
  • Town centre

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

@article{96632404d5b447a89842ac5d470a98f6,
title = "Localising activity within the context of relational complexity: Exploring the relevance of rural centre and town centre conceptions",
abstract = "The planning practice of focusing most rural development within larger settlements has failed to achieve goals of rural activity colocation. In a society where quality of opportunity has become dominant in location decisions, a broader imaginative perspective than the physical proximity of functions is required if meaningful activity colocation is to occur. The extent to which residents and employees can be encouraged to localise their activity is explored through case studies of three very different small towns within the English county of Norfolk. Although not of universal appeal, small towns provide an important niche for many rural actors. Rather than abandoning policy endeavours, there is potential to improve their effectiveness by ensuring that the possible benefits arising from the colocation of activity are realised. By adopting a more flexible approach to policy application, utilising complementary conceptions which are attentive to the specific characteristics of individual places, potential exceptions to policies of development concentration can be identified. However, in the UK context ongoing cutbacks in local authority budgets are likely to prejudice the conduct of the type of fine-grained local policy development required to achieve these objectives.",
keywords = "Activity colocation, Localising activity, Rural centre, Small towns, Town centre",
author = "Powe, {Neil Adrian} and David Bek",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1068/b37034",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "501--517",
journal = "Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design",
issn = "0265-8135",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Localising activity within the context of relational complexity

T2 - Exploring the relevance of rural centre and town centre conceptions

AU - Powe, Neil Adrian

AU - Bek, David

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - The planning practice of focusing most rural development within larger settlements has failed to achieve goals of rural activity colocation. In a society where quality of opportunity has become dominant in location decisions, a broader imaginative perspective than the physical proximity of functions is required if meaningful activity colocation is to occur. The extent to which residents and employees can be encouraged to localise their activity is explored through case studies of three very different small towns within the English county of Norfolk. Although not of universal appeal, small towns provide an important niche for many rural actors. Rather than abandoning policy endeavours, there is potential to improve their effectiveness by ensuring that the possible benefits arising from the colocation of activity are realised. By adopting a more flexible approach to policy application, utilising complementary conceptions which are attentive to the specific characteristics of individual places, potential exceptions to policies of development concentration can be identified. However, in the UK context ongoing cutbacks in local authority budgets are likely to prejudice the conduct of the type of fine-grained local policy development required to achieve these objectives.

AB - The planning practice of focusing most rural development within larger settlements has failed to achieve goals of rural activity colocation. In a society where quality of opportunity has become dominant in location decisions, a broader imaginative perspective than the physical proximity of functions is required if meaningful activity colocation is to occur. The extent to which residents and employees can be encouraged to localise their activity is explored through case studies of three very different small towns within the English county of Norfolk. Although not of universal appeal, small towns provide an important niche for many rural actors. Rather than abandoning policy endeavours, there is potential to improve their effectiveness by ensuring that the possible benefits arising from the colocation of activity are realised. By adopting a more flexible approach to policy application, utilising complementary conceptions which are attentive to the specific characteristics of individual places, potential exceptions to policies of development concentration can be identified. However, in the UK context ongoing cutbacks in local authority budgets are likely to prejudice the conduct of the type of fine-grained local policy development required to achieve these objectives.

KW - Activity colocation

KW - Localising activity

KW - Rural centre

KW - Small towns

KW - Town centre

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864040907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1068/b37034

DO - 10.1068/b37034

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 501

EP - 517

JO - Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

JF - Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

SN - 0265-8135

IS - 3

ER -