Livestock in diverse cropping systems improve weed management and sustain yields whilst reducing inputs

Chloe MacLaren, Jonathan Storkey, Johann Strauss, Pieter Swanepoel, Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Intensive cropping systems select for a low diversity of weeds tolerant of chemical control, leading to persistent weed-crop competition and declining biodiversity. Crop rotation can mitigate this by introducing variable filters on the weed community through increasing management diversity. In this study, we investigate the effect of integrating livestock into no-till crop rotations to complement chemical weed control. We analysed 12 years of weed seedbank data from a trial of eight rotation systems with different crop sequence diversities, of which four included grazed forage phases. Linear mixed models and ordination were used to assess how weed abundance, diversity, and community composition responded to management filters, defined in terms of levels of disturbance strength and diversity (grazing and herbicides), and resource availability and diversity (inorganic fertilizers, legumes, and manure). Grazed rotation systems had less herbicide applied than ungrazed rotation systems, and had the lowest weed abundance and highest weed diversity. Herbicides and grazing apply contrasting selection pressures on weeds, and this combination was more effective in reducing weed pressure than increasing herbicide quantity or mode-of-action diversity. Lower resource availability and higher nitrogen source diversity in grazed systems may have further reduced weed abundance and promoted diversity. Crop sequence diversity also reduced weed abundance and promoted weed diversity, indicating that variable crop-weed interactions can enhance weed management. In addition, yields in the main cash crop (wheat) were highest where crop diversity was highest, regardless of whether the system contained grazed phases. Synthesis and applications. Diverse rotation systems produced high yields, and the inclusion of grazed forage phases maintained these yields at lower applications of herbicides and fertilizers: integrated livestock can therefore improve the sustainability of no-till systems. The role of grazing as a filter imposing a contrasting selection pressure to other weed control options could be further explored to improve weed management in different farming systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)144-156
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume56
Issue number1
Early online date3 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

weed
cropping systems
weed control
cropping practice
livestock
weeds
herbicide
herbicides
crop
cropping sequence
grazing
no-tillage
crop rotation
resource availability
filter
forage
intensive cropping
crop-weed competition
cash crops
chemical control

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: MacLaren, C, Storkey, J, Strauss, J, Swanepoel, P & Dehnen-Schmutz, K 2018, 'Livestock in diverse cropping systems improve weed management and sustain yields whilst reducing
inputs' Journal of Applied Ecology, vol 56, pp. 144-156, which has been published in final form at https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13239
This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Keywords

  • crop diversity
  • crop rotation
  • forage legumes
  • grazing
  • integrated crop-livestock systems
  • selection pressure
  • weed management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Livestock in diverse cropping systems improve weed management and sustain yields whilst reducing inputs. / MacLaren, Chloe; Storkey, Jonathan; Strauss, Johann; Swanepoel, Pieter; Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 144-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

MacLaren, Chloe ; Storkey, Jonathan ; Strauss, Johann ; Swanepoel, Pieter ; Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina. / Livestock in diverse cropping systems improve weed management and sustain yields whilst reducing inputs. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2019 ; Vol. 56, No. 1. pp. 144-156.
@article{58e21456f6b04ac6ba3d25340d1bbd96,
title = "Livestock in diverse cropping systems improve weed management and sustain yields whilst reducing inputs",
abstract = "Intensive cropping systems select for a low diversity of weeds tolerant of chemical control, leading to persistent weed-crop competition and declining biodiversity. Crop rotation can mitigate this by introducing variable filters on the weed community through increasing management diversity. In this study, we investigate the effect of integrating livestock into no-till crop rotations to complement chemical weed control. We analysed 12 years of weed seedbank data from a trial of eight rotation systems with different crop sequence diversities, of which four included grazed forage phases. Linear mixed models and ordination were used to assess how weed abundance, diversity, and community composition responded to management filters, defined in terms of levels of disturbance strength and diversity (grazing and herbicides), and resource availability and diversity (inorganic fertilizers, legumes, and manure). Grazed rotation systems had less herbicide applied than ungrazed rotation systems, and had the lowest weed abundance and highest weed diversity. Herbicides and grazing apply contrasting selection pressures on weeds, and this combination was more effective in reducing weed pressure than increasing herbicide quantity or mode-of-action diversity. Lower resource availability and higher nitrogen source diversity in grazed systems may have further reduced weed abundance and promoted diversity. Crop sequence diversity also reduced weed abundance and promoted weed diversity, indicating that variable crop-weed interactions can enhance weed management. In addition, yields in the main cash crop (wheat) were highest where crop diversity was highest, regardless of whether the system contained grazed phases. Synthesis and applications. Diverse rotation systems produced high yields, and the inclusion of grazed forage phases maintained these yields at lower applications of herbicides and fertilizers: integrated livestock can therefore improve the sustainability of no-till systems. The role of grazing as a filter imposing a contrasting selection pressure to other weed control options could be further explored to improve weed management in different farming systems.",
keywords = "crop diversity, crop rotation, forage legumes, grazing, integrated crop-livestock systems, selection pressure, weed management",
author = "Chloe MacLaren and Jonathan Storkey and Johann Strauss and Pieter Swanepoel and Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: MacLaren, C, Storkey, J, Strauss, J, Swanepoel, P & Dehnen-Schmutz, K 2018, 'Livestock in diverse cropping systems improve weed management and sustain yields whilst reducing inputs' Journal of Applied Ecology, vol 56, pp. 144-156, which has been published in final form at https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13239 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. Copyright {\circledC} and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.13239",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "144--156",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Livestock in diverse cropping systems improve weed management and sustain yields whilst reducing inputs

AU - MacLaren, Chloe

AU - Storkey, Jonathan

AU - Strauss, Johann

AU - Swanepoel, Pieter

AU - Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: MacLaren, C, Storkey, J, Strauss, J, Swanepoel, P & Dehnen-Schmutz, K 2018, 'Livestock in diverse cropping systems improve weed management and sustain yields whilst reducing inputs' Journal of Applied Ecology, vol 56, pp. 144-156, which has been published in final form at https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13239 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Intensive cropping systems select for a low diversity of weeds tolerant of chemical control, leading to persistent weed-crop competition and declining biodiversity. Crop rotation can mitigate this by introducing variable filters on the weed community through increasing management diversity. In this study, we investigate the effect of integrating livestock into no-till crop rotations to complement chemical weed control. We analysed 12 years of weed seedbank data from a trial of eight rotation systems with different crop sequence diversities, of which four included grazed forage phases. Linear mixed models and ordination were used to assess how weed abundance, diversity, and community composition responded to management filters, defined in terms of levels of disturbance strength and diversity (grazing and herbicides), and resource availability and diversity (inorganic fertilizers, legumes, and manure). Grazed rotation systems had less herbicide applied than ungrazed rotation systems, and had the lowest weed abundance and highest weed diversity. Herbicides and grazing apply contrasting selection pressures on weeds, and this combination was more effective in reducing weed pressure than increasing herbicide quantity or mode-of-action diversity. Lower resource availability and higher nitrogen source diversity in grazed systems may have further reduced weed abundance and promoted diversity. Crop sequence diversity also reduced weed abundance and promoted weed diversity, indicating that variable crop-weed interactions can enhance weed management. In addition, yields in the main cash crop (wheat) were highest where crop diversity was highest, regardless of whether the system contained grazed phases. Synthesis and applications. Diverse rotation systems produced high yields, and the inclusion of grazed forage phases maintained these yields at lower applications of herbicides and fertilizers: integrated livestock can therefore improve the sustainability of no-till systems. The role of grazing as a filter imposing a contrasting selection pressure to other weed control options could be further explored to improve weed management in different farming systems.

AB - Intensive cropping systems select for a low diversity of weeds tolerant of chemical control, leading to persistent weed-crop competition and declining biodiversity. Crop rotation can mitigate this by introducing variable filters on the weed community through increasing management diversity. In this study, we investigate the effect of integrating livestock into no-till crop rotations to complement chemical weed control. We analysed 12 years of weed seedbank data from a trial of eight rotation systems with different crop sequence diversities, of which four included grazed forage phases. Linear mixed models and ordination were used to assess how weed abundance, diversity, and community composition responded to management filters, defined in terms of levels of disturbance strength and diversity (grazing and herbicides), and resource availability and diversity (inorganic fertilizers, legumes, and manure). Grazed rotation systems had less herbicide applied than ungrazed rotation systems, and had the lowest weed abundance and highest weed diversity. Herbicides and grazing apply contrasting selection pressures on weeds, and this combination was more effective in reducing weed pressure than increasing herbicide quantity or mode-of-action diversity. Lower resource availability and higher nitrogen source diversity in grazed systems may have further reduced weed abundance and promoted diversity. Crop sequence diversity also reduced weed abundance and promoted weed diversity, indicating that variable crop-weed interactions can enhance weed management. In addition, yields in the main cash crop (wheat) were highest where crop diversity was highest, regardless of whether the system contained grazed phases. Synthesis and applications. Diverse rotation systems produced high yields, and the inclusion of grazed forage phases maintained these yields at lower applications of herbicides and fertilizers: integrated livestock can therefore improve the sustainability of no-till systems. The role of grazing as a filter imposing a contrasting selection pressure to other weed control options could be further explored to improve weed management in different farming systems.

KW - crop diversity

KW - crop rotation

KW - forage legumes

KW - grazing

KW - integrated crop-livestock systems

KW - selection pressure

KW - weed management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052643879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13239

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13239

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 144

EP - 156

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

IS - 1

ER -