Leveraging the London 2012 Paralympic Games: What legacy for people with disabilities?

Ian Brittain, A. Beacom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)
30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The International Paralympic Committee, UK Government and the Organising Committee for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games all contended that the London 2012 Paralympic Games would positively impact the lives of disabled people in the UK, particularly with regard to changing non-disabled attitudes towards disability. All three have claimed partial success during the course of the four year period (Olympiad) separating the London and Rio Paralympic Games. However, this is at odds with the findings of Disabled People’s Organisations (DPOs) and the experiences of disabled individuals. This paper, considers the claims of both sides against a backdrop of public policies that are targeting large scale benefits cuts, the media coverage of which actually appears to be hardening attitudes towards anyone on benefits and negating any positive impacts from the Games themselves. It argues that the continued predominance of ‘ableist’ perspectives on disability underpins many of the challenges faced by disabled people. The paper adopts a historical perspective on the development of legacy based foundations upon which the disability sport and Paralympic movements originated. It contends that the gradual move towards an elite ‘Olympic’ sports model of competition has actually served to undermine these foundations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)499-521
JournalJournal of Sport and Social Issues
Volume40
Issue number6
Early online date20 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

disability
Sports
public policy
elite
coverage
experience

Keywords

  • Paralympic
  • Legacy
  • London 2012
  • Disabled People
  • Benefits Cuts

Cite this

Leveraging the London 2012 Paralympic Games: What legacy for people with disabilities? / Brittain, Ian; Beacom, A.

In: Journal of Sport and Social Issues, Vol. 40, No. 6, 01.12.2016, p. 499-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{31adabebf36241dca2ed9db3b1edc537,
title = "Leveraging the London 2012 Paralympic Games: What legacy for people with disabilities?",
abstract = "The International Paralympic Committee, UK Government and the Organising Committee for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games all contended that the London 2012 Paralympic Games would positively impact the lives of disabled people in the UK, particularly with regard to changing non-disabled attitudes towards disability. All three have claimed partial success during the course of the four year period (Olympiad) separating the London and Rio Paralympic Games. However, this is at odds with the findings of Disabled People’s Organisations (DPOs) and the experiences of disabled individuals. This paper, considers the claims of both sides against a backdrop of public policies that are targeting large scale benefits cuts, the media coverage of which actually appears to be hardening attitudes towards anyone on benefits and negating any positive impacts from the Games themselves. It argues that the continued predominance of ‘ableist’ perspectives on disability underpins many of the challenges faced by disabled people. The paper adopts a historical perspective on the development of legacy based foundations upon which the disability sport and Paralympic movements originated. It contends that the gradual move towards an elite ‘Olympic’ sports model of competition has actually served to undermine these foundations.",
keywords = "Paralympic, Legacy, London 2012, Disabled People, Benefits Cuts",
author = "Ian Brittain and A. Beacom",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0193723516655580",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "499--521",
journal = "Journal of Sport and Social Issues",
issn = "0193-7235",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Leveraging the London 2012 Paralympic Games: What legacy for people with disabilities?

AU - Brittain, Ian

AU - Beacom, A.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - The International Paralympic Committee, UK Government and the Organising Committee for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games all contended that the London 2012 Paralympic Games would positively impact the lives of disabled people in the UK, particularly with regard to changing non-disabled attitudes towards disability. All three have claimed partial success during the course of the four year period (Olympiad) separating the London and Rio Paralympic Games. However, this is at odds with the findings of Disabled People’s Organisations (DPOs) and the experiences of disabled individuals. This paper, considers the claims of both sides against a backdrop of public policies that are targeting large scale benefits cuts, the media coverage of which actually appears to be hardening attitudes towards anyone on benefits and negating any positive impacts from the Games themselves. It argues that the continued predominance of ‘ableist’ perspectives on disability underpins many of the challenges faced by disabled people. The paper adopts a historical perspective on the development of legacy based foundations upon which the disability sport and Paralympic movements originated. It contends that the gradual move towards an elite ‘Olympic’ sports model of competition has actually served to undermine these foundations.

AB - The International Paralympic Committee, UK Government and the Organising Committee for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games all contended that the London 2012 Paralympic Games would positively impact the lives of disabled people in the UK, particularly with regard to changing non-disabled attitudes towards disability. All three have claimed partial success during the course of the four year period (Olympiad) separating the London and Rio Paralympic Games. However, this is at odds with the findings of Disabled People’s Organisations (DPOs) and the experiences of disabled individuals. This paper, considers the claims of both sides against a backdrop of public policies that are targeting large scale benefits cuts, the media coverage of which actually appears to be hardening attitudes towards anyone on benefits and negating any positive impacts from the Games themselves. It argues that the continued predominance of ‘ableist’ perspectives on disability underpins many of the challenges faced by disabled people. The paper adopts a historical perspective on the development of legacy based foundations upon which the disability sport and Paralympic movements originated. It contends that the gradual move towards an elite ‘Olympic’ sports model of competition has actually served to undermine these foundations.

KW - Paralympic

KW - Legacy

KW - London 2012

KW - Disabled People

KW - Benefits Cuts

U2 - 10.1177/0193723516655580

DO - 10.1177/0193723516655580

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 499

EP - 521

JO - Journal of Sport and Social Issues

JF - Journal of Sport and Social Issues

SN - 0193-7235

IS - 6

ER -