Legal professional privilege of advice of the Attorney General

Daniel Kenealy, Stuart MacLennan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Considers whether, in terms of legal professional privilege, the Attorney General's role is equivalent to that of other lawyers when dealing with clients. Looks at how legal privilege operates both at law and in practice. Suggests that Parliament's power to compel the disclosure of legal advice given by the Attorney General to the Government is a political, rather than a legal, issue.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-87
Number of pages7
JournalCoventry Law Journal
Volume24
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jan 2020

Bibliographical note

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission
or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Keywords

  • Attorney General
  • Legal professional privilege

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Legal professional privilege of advice of the Attorney General'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this