Leadership training in emergency medicine: A national survey

Shea Palmer, Amanda Rodrigues Amorim Adegboye, Gareth Hooper, Aanika Khan, Caroline Leech, Amanda Moore, Bhupinder Pawar, Ala Szczepura, Chris Turner, Rosie Kneafsey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency medicine (EM) is a uniquely stressful environment in which leadership training could improve individual and team performance, patient outcomes, well-being, and EM career intentions. The primary aim was to evaluate EM-specific leadership training (EMLeaders) compared to no leadership training. A secondary comparison was with other forms of leadership training.

METHODS: An online survey was distributed to Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) members in England. Three groups were recruited: those who reported receiving EMLeaders training, no training, and other training. Information was collected on group demographics, job roles, responses to 14 leadership knowledge and skills items, well-being at work, and EM career intentions.

RESULTS: A total of 417 responders (177 EMLeaders, 148 no training, 92 other training) were largely representative of RCEM members, although the EMLeaders group were at less senior career grades. Although all groups provided generally positive responses, EMLeaders demonstrated more positive ratings for seven of 14 leadership items relative to no training (all p  < 0.05): knowledge about clinical leadership, application of clinical leadership, empowerment to make decisions, managing the emergency department environment, ability to influence the EM environment, confidence in leadership, and confidence in facilitating teams. The other training group demonstrated superior ratings for five of seven of the same items, except empowerment to make decisions and ability to influence the EM environment. Direct comparison of EMLeaders with other training identified ability to influence the EM environment as a unique benefit of EMLeaders ( p  < 0.05), while knowledge about clinical leadership favored other training ( p  < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: EMLeaders improved many aspects of perceived leadership knowledge and skills, but there was little evidence of impact on well-being or EM career intentions. EMLeaders particularly appears to enhance perceived ability to influence the EM environment. Considering that the EMLeaders group were generally earlier in their career, the findings are promising and can inform the refinement of future EM-specific training.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere11047
Number of pages8
JournalAEM Education and Training
Volume8
Issue number6
Early online date21 Nov 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,provided the original work is properly cited.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from Health Education England.

FundersFunder number
Health Education England

    Keywords

    • education
    • emergency medicine
    • innovation
    • leadership
    • learning
    • specialty training
    • surveys and questionnaires

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Emergency Medicine
    • Education
    • Emergency

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Leadership training in emergency medicine: A national survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this