Knee-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Young Adults: A Scoping Meta-Review

Nicole Bausch, Emma Eyre, Gemma Pearce, Shea Palmer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) research on young adults and knee disorders. This scoping meta-review examined a young adult population and aimed to (1) provide an overview of knee-related PROMs research and (2) evaluate the measurement properties of the five most evaluated knee-related PROMs relevant for individual care and group-level analysis. Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed and COSMIN databases was conducted on 18 September 2023 and updated on 25 November 2024 to identify systematic reviews of knee-related PROMs in young adults. Data relevant to individual care and group-level analysis of the five most evaluated PROMs were extracted based on the PROM-cycle and analysed guided by COSMIN recommendations. Results: Fifteen systematic reviews were included, evaluating 80 knee-related PROMs. Ten of the 15 systematic reviews did not use a tool to synthesise multiple studies or a PROM evaluation tool. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) had the strongest evidence to be an appropriate PROM for individual care and the Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS) for group-level analysis in a young adult population. However, none of the five PROMs demonstrated sufficient high-quality evidence across all identified measurement properties. Conclusion: The scoping meta-review highlights that systemic reviews of measurement properties were reported inconsistently, making it challenging to detangle the extracted data. Therefore, advances in PROMs-specific methods and reporting recommendations should enhance the quality of PROM evidence, allowing readers to appraise relevant evidence and select the most appropriate PROMs for their intended purpose.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70037
Number of pages13
JournalMusculoskeletal Care
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date31 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 31 Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Bausch, N, Eyre, E, Pearce, G & Palmer, S 2024, 'Knee-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Young Adults: A Scoping Meta-Review', Musculoskeletal Care, vol. 23, no. 1, e70037., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70037. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.

This document is the author’s post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it.

Funder

NIHR302724. Grant Number: NIHR302724

Funding

This work was supported by a HEE/NIHR ICA Pre-doctoral Clinical and Practitioner Academic Fellowship award for the lead author (NB) (NIHR302724).

FundersFunder number
HEE/NIHR ICA Pre-doctoral Clinical and Practitioner Academic Fellowship NIHR302724

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Rheumatology
    • Chiropractics
    • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
    • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
    • Rehabilitation
    • Nursing (miscellaneous)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Knee-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Young Adults: A Scoping Meta-Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this