Just telling and selling: current limitations in the use of digital media in public health: A scoping review

C. Clar, M. Dyakova, Kristina Curtis, C. Dawson, P. Donnelly, L. Knifton, A. Clarke

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective

To undertake a scoping review and to map research in the area of digital media use in public health.

Study design

Scoping review.

Methods

PubMed, PsycINFO, Google and major textbooks of public health communication and health psychology were searched for primary studies or systematic reviews examining the use of digital media in a health context. Searches focussed on studies published between the start of 2000 and the end of June 2013. Abstracts of reviews of public health interventions were examined with respect to target groups, health topic, intervention characteristics, media used, study design, issues of quality and ethics, and outcomes. To map this area of work fully, this information was supplemented by adding information from primary studies. Areas were identified where systematic review evidence was scarce or non-existent by comparing the final map with information from the reviews analysed.

Results

221 systematic reviews related to digital media use in a public health context were included. Most reviews included studies with an experimental design and general ‘at risk’ target populations. Specific settings were not specified in the majority of reviews. A large variety of health topics were covered. About a quarter of reviews did not specify a health topic but were concerned with broader issues of health promotion, disease prevention, or health education. Over half of the reviews focussed on eHealth and telemedicine, and another third were concerned with mass media – social marketing. Reviews most frequently reported behaviour-related outcomes or conducted some form of content analysis or analysis of the use of particular media. Research gaps were identified relating to community-based research, participation and empowerment, active media use (especially with respect to visual media und use of specific visual methodologies), and the use of salutogenic or assets-based approaches.

Conclusion

The available research relating to digital media use in public health is dominated by studies relating to eHealth, telehealth or social marketing; emphasising the passive reception of messages and a focus on individual behaviour change approaches. Issues of quality and ethics need to be taken into account more consistently. Further research is needed with respect to more participatory methods, particularly those which would seek to use digital media as a means to harness individual and community assets.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1066-1075
Number of pages10
JournalPublic Health
Volume128
Issue number12
Early online date24 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Telemedicine
Public Health
Social Marketing
Research
Health
Ethics
Behavioral Medicine
Health Communication
Mass Media
Textbooks
Health Services Needs and Demand
Health Promotion
Health Education
Research Design

Keywords

  • Digital media
  • (Participatory) Visual methodologies
  • Public health

Cite this

Just telling and selling: current limitations in the use of digital media in public health : A scoping review. / Clar, C.; Dyakova, M.; Curtis, Kristina; Dawson, C.; Donnelly, P.; Knifton, L.; Clarke, A.

In: Public Health, Vol. 128, No. 12, 12.2014, p. 1066-1075.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Clar, C. ; Dyakova, M. ; Curtis, Kristina ; Dawson, C. ; Donnelly, P. ; Knifton, L. ; Clarke, A. / Just telling and selling: current limitations in the use of digital media in public health : A scoping review. In: Public Health. 2014 ; Vol. 128, No. 12. pp. 1066-1075.
@article{0fe941e012d04441bf595746aaa0a3b6,
title = "Just telling and selling: current limitations in the use of digital media in public health: A scoping review",
abstract = "ObjectiveTo undertake a scoping review and to map research in the area of digital media use in public health.Study designScoping review.MethodsPubMed, PsycINFO, Google and major textbooks of public health communication and health psychology were searched for primary studies or systematic reviews examining the use of digital media in a health context. Searches focussed on studies published between the start of 2000 and the end of June 2013. Abstracts of reviews of public health interventions were examined with respect to target groups, health topic, intervention characteristics, media used, study design, issues of quality and ethics, and outcomes. To map this area of work fully, this information was supplemented by adding information from primary studies. Areas were identified where systematic review evidence was scarce or non-existent by comparing the final map with information from the reviews analysed.Results221 systematic reviews related to digital media use in a public health context were included. Most reviews included studies with an experimental design and general ‘at risk’ target populations. Specific settings were not specified in the majority of reviews. A large variety of health topics were covered. About a quarter of reviews did not specify a health topic but were concerned with broader issues of health promotion, disease prevention, or health education. Over half of the reviews focussed on eHealth and telemedicine, and another third were concerned with mass media – social marketing. Reviews most frequently reported behaviour-related outcomes or conducted some form of content analysis or analysis of the use of particular media. Research gaps were identified relating to community-based research, participation and empowerment, active media use (especially with respect to visual media und use of specific visual methodologies), and the use of salutogenic or assets-based approaches.ConclusionThe available research relating to digital media use in public health is dominated by studies relating to eHealth, telehealth or social marketing; emphasising the passive reception of messages and a focus on individual behaviour change approaches. Issues of quality and ethics need to be taken into account more consistently. Further research is needed with respect to more participatory methods, particularly those which would seek to use digital media as a means to harness individual and community assets.",
keywords = "Digital media, (Participatory) Visual methodologies, Public health",
author = "C. Clar and M. Dyakova and Kristina Curtis and C. Dawson and P. Donnelly and L. Knifton and A. Clarke",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.puhe.2014.09.009",
language = "English",
volume = "128",
pages = "1066--1075",
journal = "Public Health",
issn = "0033-3506",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Just telling and selling: current limitations in the use of digital media in public health

T2 - A scoping review

AU - Clar, C.

AU - Dyakova, M.

AU - Curtis, Kristina

AU - Dawson, C.

AU - Donnelly, P.

AU - Knifton, L.

AU - Clarke, A.

PY - 2014/12

Y1 - 2014/12

N2 - ObjectiveTo undertake a scoping review and to map research in the area of digital media use in public health.Study designScoping review.MethodsPubMed, PsycINFO, Google and major textbooks of public health communication and health psychology were searched for primary studies or systematic reviews examining the use of digital media in a health context. Searches focussed on studies published between the start of 2000 and the end of June 2013. Abstracts of reviews of public health interventions were examined with respect to target groups, health topic, intervention characteristics, media used, study design, issues of quality and ethics, and outcomes. To map this area of work fully, this information was supplemented by adding information from primary studies. Areas were identified where systematic review evidence was scarce or non-existent by comparing the final map with information from the reviews analysed.Results221 systematic reviews related to digital media use in a public health context were included. Most reviews included studies with an experimental design and general ‘at risk’ target populations. Specific settings were not specified in the majority of reviews. A large variety of health topics were covered. About a quarter of reviews did not specify a health topic but were concerned with broader issues of health promotion, disease prevention, or health education. Over half of the reviews focussed on eHealth and telemedicine, and another third were concerned with mass media – social marketing. Reviews most frequently reported behaviour-related outcomes or conducted some form of content analysis or analysis of the use of particular media. Research gaps were identified relating to community-based research, participation and empowerment, active media use (especially with respect to visual media und use of specific visual methodologies), and the use of salutogenic or assets-based approaches.ConclusionThe available research relating to digital media use in public health is dominated by studies relating to eHealth, telehealth or social marketing; emphasising the passive reception of messages and a focus on individual behaviour change approaches. Issues of quality and ethics need to be taken into account more consistently. Further research is needed with respect to more participatory methods, particularly those which would seek to use digital media as a means to harness individual and community assets.

AB - ObjectiveTo undertake a scoping review and to map research in the area of digital media use in public health.Study designScoping review.MethodsPubMed, PsycINFO, Google and major textbooks of public health communication and health psychology were searched for primary studies or systematic reviews examining the use of digital media in a health context. Searches focussed on studies published between the start of 2000 and the end of June 2013. Abstracts of reviews of public health interventions were examined with respect to target groups, health topic, intervention characteristics, media used, study design, issues of quality and ethics, and outcomes. To map this area of work fully, this information was supplemented by adding information from primary studies. Areas were identified where systematic review evidence was scarce or non-existent by comparing the final map with information from the reviews analysed.Results221 systematic reviews related to digital media use in a public health context were included. Most reviews included studies with an experimental design and general ‘at risk’ target populations. Specific settings were not specified in the majority of reviews. A large variety of health topics were covered. About a quarter of reviews did not specify a health topic but were concerned with broader issues of health promotion, disease prevention, or health education. Over half of the reviews focussed on eHealth and telemedicine, and another third were concerned with mass media – social marketing. Reviews most frequently reported behaviour-related outcomes or conducted some form of content analysis or analysis of the use of particular media. Research gaps were identified relating to community-based research, participation and empowerment, active media use (especially with respect to visual media und use of specific visual methodologies), and the use of salutogenic or assets-based approaches.ConclusionThe available research relating to digital media use in public health is dominated by studies relating to eHealth, telehealth or social marketing; emphasising the passive reception of messages and a focus on individual behaviour change approaches. Issues of quality and ethics need to be taken into account more consistently. Further research is needed with respect to more participatory methods, particularly those which would seek to use digital media as a means to harness individual and community assets.

KW - Digital media

KW - (Participatory) Visual methodologies

KW - Public health

U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.09.009

DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.09.009

M3 - Review article

VL - 128

SP - 1066

EP - 1075

JO - Public Health

JF - Public Health

SN - 0033-3506

IS - 12

ER -