Just because you write about posthumanism doesn’t mean you aren’t a liberal humanist: an interview with Gary Hall

  • Francien Broekhuizen
  • , S. Dawes
  • , D. Mikelli
  • , Poppy Wilde
  • , Gary Hall

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    137 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In this follow-up interview to his keynote lecture at the MeCCSA-PGN 2015 Conference in Coventry, Gary Hall discusses the processes of neoliberal subjectivation and the metricisation of the academy. Arguing that most media, communication and cultural studies critique tends to focus on the new, self-governing and self-exploitative subjects academics and students are transforming into rather than the scholarly subjectivities they are changing from, Hall maintains that both the new neoliberal model (associated with corporate social and mobile media) and the liberal humanist model (associated with conventional print-on-paper publishing) are involved in the subordination of scholarly agency and consciousness to the pre-programmed, controllable patterns of the capitalist culture industries. Taking in some of the open access initiatives with which he’s involved, the interview addresses both Hall’s account of the processes of neoliberalisation and his experiments with radically different ways of working and thinking as a media theorist and philosopher.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalNetworking Knowledge
    Volume9
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2016
    EventMeCCSA PGN Conference 2015 - Coventry, United Kingdom
    Duration: 2 Jul 20153 Jul 2015

    Bibliographical note

    The full text is available free from the link given.

    Keywords

    • Liberal
    • Neoliberal
    • Human
    • Posthuman
    • Non-human
    • Open Humanities Press
    • Media Theory
    • Gutenberg
    • McLuhan
    • Foucault
    • Subjectivity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Just because you write about posthumanism doesn’t mean you aren’t a liberal humanist: an interview with Gary Hall'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this