Juggling competing activities: academic staff as doctoral candidates

Jan Smith , Jennie Billot, Deanne Clouder, Virginia King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article explores the experiences of a group of established academic staff in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, as they undertake a doctorate in their home institutions. Our interest is in how individuals negotiate this dual status from a cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) stance which explores how rules, tools, community and divisions of labour, and interacting activity systems, shape doctoral experiences. The focus in this article, having analysed their detailed narrative accounts, is on how academics experience three interdependent activity systems: those surrounding the thesis, the institutional context, and the home-life spheres. Issues related to time, workload and supervision issues, variability in collegial support and impact on personal priorities and time emerged. There is a range of particularities – from easy access to resources/supervisors, to inflexible institutional regulations – applicable to this group of doctoral candidates. Negotiating life as an academic with concurrent doctoral candidature provides positive outcomes in terms of teaching, research confidence and general personal and professional development. However, a range of difficulties can also be encountered, particularly in relation to personal and professional relationships, and workload management.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)(In-press)
Number of pages26
JournalHigher Education Research & Development
Volume(In-press)
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 4 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

candidacy
staff
workload
life sphere
experience
teaching research
division of labor
supervision
New Zealand
Group
confidence
regulation
narrative
management
resources
community
time

Keywords

  • academic work
  • doctoral education
  • doctoral supervision
  • professional development

Cite this

Juggling competing activities: academic staff as doctoral candidates. / Smith , Jan ; Billot, Jennie ; Clouder, Deanne; King, Virginia.

In: Higher Education Research & Development, Vol. (In-press), 04.08.2019, p. (In-press).

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{28cc777b1b3b487282b738a5334e8109,
title = "Juggling competing activities: academic staff as doctoral candidates",
abstract = "This article explores the experiences of a group of established academic staff in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, as they undertake a doctorate in their home institutions. Our interest is in how individuals negotiate this dual status from a cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) stance which explores how rules, tools, community and divisions of labour, and interacting activity systems, shape doctoral experiences. The focus in this article, having analysed their detailed narrative accounts, is on how academics experience three interdependent activity systems: those surrounding the thesis, the institutional context, and the home-life spheres. Issues related to time, workload and supervision issues, variability in collegial support and impact on personal priorities and time emerged. There is a range of particularities – from easy access to resources/supervisors, to inflexible institutional regulations – applicable to this group of doctoral candidates. Negotiating life as an academic with concurrent doctoral candidature provides positive outcomes in terms of teaching, research confidence and general personal and professional development. However, a range of difficulties can also be encountered, particularly in relation to personal and professional relationships, and workload management.",
keywords = "academic work, doctoral education, doctoral supervision, professional development",
author = "Jan Smith and Jennie Billot and Deanne Clouder and Virginia King",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "(In-press)",
pages = "(In--press)",
journal = "Higher Education Research and Development",
issn = "0729-4360",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Juggling competing activities: academic staff as doctoral candidates

AU - Smith , Jan

AU - Billot, Jennie

AU - Clouder, Deanne

AU - King, Virginia

PY - 2019/8/4

Y1 - 2019/8/4

N2 - This article explores the experiences of a group of established academic staff in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, as they undertake a doctorate in their home institutions. Our interest is in how individuals negotiate this dual status from a cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) stance which explores how rules, tools, community and divisions of labour, and interacting activity systems, shape doctoral experiences. The focus in this article, having analysed their detailed narrative accounts, is on how academics experience three interdependent activity systems: those surrounding the thesis, the institutional context, and the home-life spheres. Issues related to time, workload and supervision issues, variability in collegial support and impact on personal priorities and time emerged. There is a range of particularities – from easy access to resources/supervisors, to inflexible institutional regulations – applicable to this group of doctoral candidates. Negotiating life as an academic with concurrent doctoral candidature provides positive outcomes in terms of teaching, research confidence and general personal and professional development. However, a range of difficulties can also be encountered, particularly in relation to personal and professional relationships, and workload management.

AB - This article explores the experiences of a group of established academic staff in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, as they undertake a doctorate in their home institutions. Our interest is in how individuals negotiate this dual status from a cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) stance which explores how rules, tools, community and divisions of labour, and interacting activity systems, shape doctoral experiences. The focus in this article, having analysed their detailed narrative accounts, is on how academics experience three interdependent activity systems: those surrounding the thesis, the institutional context, and the home-life spheres. Issues related to time, workload and supervision issues, variability in collegial support and impact on personal priorities and time emerged. There is a range of particularities – from easy access to resources/supervisors, to inflexible institutional regulations – applicable to this group of doctoral candidates. Negotiating life as an academic with concurrent doctoral candidature provides positive outcomes in terms of teaching, research confidence and general personal and professional development. However, a range of difficulties can also be encountered, particularly in relation to personal and professional relationships, and workload management.

KW - academic work

KW - doctoral education

KW - doctoral supervision

KW - professional development

M3 - Article

VL - (In-press)

SP - (In-press)

JO - Higher Education Research and Development

JF - Higher Education Research and Development

SN - 0729-4360

ER -