Jobseeker's Allowance and the “habitual residence” legacy

Carol Brennan, Stephen Hardy

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

In light of the fact that some 15,000 appeals on the ‘habitual residence' test are currently awaiting determination, then benefits law practitioners should brush up their knowledge on this important, but legally grey, area. This starred Commissioner’s decision (82/95, also known as CIS/1067/1995) illustrates an all too common problem which benefits advisers continuously encountered throughout last year - the ‘habitual residence' rules. Since Regulation 21 and Schedule 7 of the Income Support (General) Regulations 1987 (SI [1987] No. 1967) provided no definition of the 'habitual residence' test, the general rule that from 1 August 1994 to September 1996, all Income Support (IS) claimants, deemed not to be habitually resident in the UK, Republic of Ireland, Channel Islands or the Isle of Man were not entitled to IS. The few exemptions to this rule, according to Schedule 7, were claimants who were: '(a) workers or a person with a right to reside in the UK [under EC law]; or (b) a refugee; or (c) a person who has been granted exceptional leave to remain in the UK by the Secretary of State’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-75
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Social Welfare and Family Law
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

income
regulation
human being
exemption
European Law
refugee
Ireland
republic
appeal
resident
worker
Law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Jobseeker's Allowance and the “habitual residence” legacy. / Brennan, Carol; Hardy, Stephen.

In: Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.01.1997, p. 73-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{fe6c09252f2f435ca5a08d5cafc9d2b4,
title = "Jobseeker's Allowance and the “habitual residence” legacy",
abstract = "In light of the fact that some 15,000 appeals on the ‘habitual residence' test are currently awaiting determination, then benefits law practitioners should brush up their knowledge on this important, but legally grey, area. This starred Commissioner’s decision (82/95, also known as CIS/1067/1995) illustrates an all too common problem which benefits advisers continuously encountered throughout last year - the ‘habitual residence' rules. Since Regulation 21 and Schedule 7 of the Income Support (General) Regulations 1987 (SI [1987] No. 1967) provided no definition of the 'habitual residence' test, the general rule that from 1 August 1994 to September 1996, all Income Support (IS) claimants, deemed not to be habitually resident in the UK, Republic of Ireland, Channel Islands or the Isle of Man were not entitled to IS. The few exemptions to this rule, according to Schedule 7, were claimants who were: '(a) workers or a person with a right to reside in the UK [under EC law]; or (b) a refugee; or (c) a person who has been granted exceptional leave to remain in the UK by the Secretary of State’.",
author = "Carol Brennan and Stephen Hardy",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09649069708410200",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "73--75",
journal = "Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law",
issn = "0964-9069",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jobseeker's Allowance and the “habitual residence” legacy

AU - Brennan, Carol

AU - Hardy, Stephen

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - In light of the fact that some 15,000 appeals on the ‘habitual residence' test are currently awaiting determination, then benefits law practitioners should brush up their knowledge on this important, but legally grey, area. This starred Commissioner’s decision (82/95, also known as CIS/1067/1995) illustrates an all too common problem which benefits advisers continuously encountered throughout last year - the ‘habitual residence' rules. Since Regulation 21 and Schedule 7 of the Income Support (General) Regulations 1987 (SI [1987] No. 1967) provided no definition of the 'habitual residence' test, the general rule that from 1 August 1994 to September 1996, all Income Support (IS) claimants, deemed not to be habitually resident in the UK, Republic of Ireland, Channel Islands or the Isle of Man were not entitled to IS. The few exemptions to this rule, according to Schedule 7, were claimants who were: '(a) workers or a person with a right to reside in the UK [under EC law]; or (b) a refugee; or (c) a person who has been granted exceptional leave to remain in the UK by the Secretary of State’.

AB - In light of the fact that some 15,000 appeals on the ‘habitual residence' test are currently awaiting determination, then benefits law practitioners should brush up their knowledge on this important, but legally grey, area. This starred Commissioner’s decision (82/95, also known as CIS/1067/1995) illustrates an all too common problem which benefits advisers continuously encountered throughout last year - the ‘habitual residence' rules. Since Regulation 21 and Schedule 7 of the Income Support (General) Regulations 1987 (SI [1987] No. 1967) provided no definition of the 'habitual residence' test, the general rule that from 1 August 1994 to September 1996, all Income Support (IS) claimants, deemed not to be habitually resident in the UK, Republic of Ireland, Channel Islands or the Isle of Man were not entitled to IS. The few exemptions to this rule, according to Schedule 7, were claimants who were: '(a) workers or a person with a right to reside in the UK [under EC law]; or (b) a refugee; or (c) a person who has been granted exceptional leave to remain in the UK by the Secretary of State’.

U2 - 10.1080/09649069708410200

DO - 10.1080/09649069708410200

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 19

SP - 73

EP - 75

JO - Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

JF - Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

SN - 0964-9069

IS - 1

ER -