Is students' qualitative feedback changing, now it is online?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Student feedback can be used to enable institutions to achieve the best possible outcomes for students through informing changes which enhance the quality of teaching and learning. Following the introduction of an online survey platform to gather student feedback at a top-performing UK university, anecdotal concerns raised by academics suggested students were being more critical. This exploratory study investigated the effects of switching from a paper to an online survey by comparing the open-ended responses between the two methods of collection. The main contribution of this study is the development of an analytical framework which can be used by other institutions to evaluate student comments, in order to understand and improve the student experience. Three key findings in this study were uncovered. Firstly, the quality of student feedback is not undermined by a switch to a more efficient online collection. Secondly, student comments via both methods of collection predominantly continue to focus on fulfilling basic needs, such as study resources. Finally, a small number of comments online revealed a lack of behavioural constraint and were considered to be inappropriate. These findings have important policy implications for the global higher education sector, highlighting the need for students to be given guidance on providing constructive feedback.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)476-488
Number of pages13
JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume44
Issue number3
Early online date30 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

student
online survey
basic need
university
lack
Teaching
resources
learning
education
experience

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education on 30/10/2018, available
online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02602938.2018.1521371

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Keywords

  • higher education
  • online disinhibition
  • social media
  • student surveys

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Is students' qualitative feedback changing, now it is online? / Gakhal, Sandeep; Wilson, Caroline.

In: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 44, No. 3, 03.04.2019, p. 476-488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a5b654fd5f4f4bde88c7ee73faae0f2e,
title = "Is students' qualitative feedback changing, now it is online?",
abstract = "Student feedback can be used to enable institutions to achieve the best possible outcomes for students through informing changes which enhance the quality of teaching and learning. Following the introduction of an online survey platform to gather student feedback at a top-performing UK university, anecdotal concerns raised by academics suggested students were being more critical. This exploratory study investigated the effects of switching from a paper to an online survey by comparing the open-ended responses between the two methods of collection. The main contribution of this study is the development of an analytical framework which can be used by other institutions to evaluate student comments, in order to understand and improve the student experience. Three key findings in this study were uncovered. Firstly, the quality of student feedback is not undermined by a switch to a more efficient online collection. Secondly, student comments via both methods of collection predominantly continue to focus on fulfilling basic needs, such as study resources. Finally, a small number of comments online revealed a lack of behavioural constraint and were considered to be inappropriate. These findings have important policy implications for the global higher education sector, highlighting the need for students to be given guidance on providing constructive feedback.",
keywords = "higher education, online disinhibition, social media, student surveys",
author = "Sandeep Gakhal and Caroline Wilson",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education on 30/10/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02602938.2018.1521371 Copyright {\circledC} and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/02602938.2018.1521371",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "476--488",
journal = "Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education",
issn = "0260-2938",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is students' qualitative feedback changing, now it is online?

AU - Gakhal, Sandeep

AU - Wilson, Caroline

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education on 30/10/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02602938.2018.1521371 Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

PY - 2019/4/3

Y1 - 2019/4/3

N2 - Student feedback can be used to enable institutions to achieve the best possible outcomes for students through informing changes which enhance the quality of teaching and learning. Following the introduction of an online survey platform to gather student feedback at a top-performing UK university, anecdotal concerns raised by academics suggested students were being more critical. This exploratory study investigated the effects of switching from a paper to an online survey by comparing the open-ended responses between the two methods of collection. The main contribution of this study is the development of an analytical framework which can be used by other institutions to evaluate student comments, in order to understand and improve the student experience. Three key findings in this study were uncovered. Firstly, the quality of student feedback is not undermined by a switch to a more efficient online collection. Secondly, student comments via both methods of collection predominantly continue to focus on fulfilling basic needs, such as study resources. Finally, a small number of comments online revealed a lack of behavioural constraint and were considered to be inappropriate. These findings have important policy implications for the global higher education sector, highlighting the need for students to be given guidance on providing constructive feedback.

AB - Student feedback can be used to enable institutions to achieve the best possible outcomes for students through informing changes which enhance the quality of teaching and learning. Following the introduction of an online survey platform to gather student feedback at a top-performing UK university, anecdotal concerns raised by academics suggested students were being more critical. This exploratory study investigated the effects of switching from a paper to an online survey by comparing the open-ended responses between the two methods of collection. The main contribution of this study is the development of an analytical framework which can be used by other institutions to evaluate student comments, in order to understand and improve the student experience. Three key findings in this study were uncovered. Firstly, the quality of student feedback is not undermined by a switch to a more efficient online collection. Secondly, student comments via both methods of collection predominantly continue to focus on fulfilling basic needs, such as study resources. Finally, a small number of comments online revealed a lack of behavioural constraint and were considered to be inappropriate. These findings have important policy implications for the global higher education sector, highlighting the need for students to be given guidance on providing constructive feedback.

KW - higher education

KW - online disinhibition

KW - social media

KW - student surveys

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055756014&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02602938.2018.1521371

DO - 10.1080/02602938.2018.1521371

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 476

EP - 488

JO - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

JF - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

SN - 0260-2938

IS - 3

ER -