Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is Herding Spurious or Intentional? Evidence from Analyst Recommendation Revisions and Sentiment

  • Jiaqi Guo
  • , Phil Holmes
  • , Ali Altanlar
    • University of Leeds

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Using institutional holdings data for 1993–2015, we investigate whether institutional herding is spurious or intentional by analysing the impact on herding of analyst recommendation revisions and sentiment. In addition to examining their effect separately, we consider the impact of their interaction. Utilising the Sias method, we develop competing hypotheses concerning spurious and intentional herding, an issue of direct interest to fund investors, given the principal-agent relationship inherent in fund management. Results strongly suggest herding is spurious. Analysis of the relationship between herding and subsequent returns, and findings from robustness tests add further support.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number101539
    JournalInternational Review of Financial Analysis
    Volume71
    Early online date15 Jun 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

    Keywords

    • Herding
    • Sentiment
    • Analyst recommendation revisions
    • Institutional investors
    • Information

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Finance

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Is Herding Spurious or Intentional? Evidence from Analyst Recommendation Revisions and Sentiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this