Is cultural sensitivity always a good thing? Arguments for a universalist social work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    214 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The requirement for social workers to be sensitive to cultural difference has now become accepted as an essential component of best practice -‒ indeed, social workers failing to display sensitivity to cultural differences would most likely be seen to be in contravention of most professional ethics frameworks. However, closer scrutiny as to exactly how and to what degree one should display cultural sensitivity in practice reveals a complex set of ethical and philosophical dilemmas for social workers; and this is the main focus of this chapter. Specifically, we argue that the largely uncritical acceptance of the concept of ‘celebrating diversity’ as an inherently ‘good thing’, has undermined Universalist approaches to ethics within social work. That is not to say that assertions of the function of social work are not based on universal principles; the problem lies in the way that these are often proffered alongside intimations to cultural relativism. A good illustration can be found in the definition of social work offered by the International Federation of Social Work which argues that whilst ‘The holistic focus of social work is universal, the priorities of social work practice will vary from country to country and from time to time depending on cultural, historical, and socio-economic conditions’ (IFSW, 2000, Para 5). Whilst the IFSW is perhaps not as guilty as some, it is precisely this kind of dualistic thinking that seeks to cover all possibilities that we argue has led to confusion amongst practitioners, particularly when working with service users from different cultural, religious or ethnic backgrounds.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationPractical Social Work Ethics
    EditorsMalcolm Carey, Lorraine Green
    Place of PublicationFarnham, Surrey
    PublisherAshgate
    Pages63-81
    ISBN (Print)978-1-4094-3825-0
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013

    Fingerprint

    social work
    social worker
    cultural difference
    cultural relativism
    professional ethics
    federation
    best practice
    acceptance
    moral philosophy
    economics
    time

    Bibliographical note

    Used by permission of the Publishers from ‘Is cultural sensitivity always a good thing? Arguments for a universalist social work’, in Practical Social Work Ethics eds. Malcolm Carey and Lorraine Green (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013), pp. 63–81. Copyright © 2013

    Cite this

    Singh, G., & Cowden, S. (2013). Is cultural sensitivity always a good thing? Arguments for a universalist social work. In M. Carey, & L. Green (Eds.), Practical Social Work Ethics (pp. 63-81). Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.

    Is cultural sensitivity always a good thing? Arguments for a universalist social work. / Singh, Gurnam; Cowden, Stephen.

    Practical Social Work Ethics. ed. / Malcolm Carey; Lorraine Green. Farnham, Surrey : Ashgate, 2013. p. 63-81.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Singh, G & Cowden, S 2013, Is cultural sensitivity always a good thing? Arguments for a universalist social work. in M Carey & L Green (eds), Practical Social Work Ethics. Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey, pp. 63-81.
    Singh G, Cowden S. Is cultural sensitivity always a good thing? Arguments for a universalist social work. In Carey M, Green L, editors, Practical Social Work Ethics. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate. 2013. p. 63-81
    Singh, Gurnam ; Cowden, Stephen. / Is cultural sensitivity always a good thing? Arguments for a universalist social work. Practical Social Work Ethics. editor / Malcolm Carey ; Lorraine Green. Farnham, Surrey : Ashgate, 2013. pp. 63-81
    @inbook{4a7ea2a20aa04af0b7f15472c7f27e47,
    title = "Is cultural sensitivity always a good thing? Arguments for a universalist social work",
    abstract = "The requirement for social workers to be sensitive to cultural difference has now become accepted as an essential component of best practice -‒ indeed, social workers failing to display sensitivity to cultural differences would most likely be seen to be in contravention of most professional ethics frameworks. However, closer scrutiny as to exactly how and to what degree one should display cultural sensitivity in practice reveals a complex set of ethical and philosophical dilemmas for social workers; and this is the main focus of this chapter. Specifically, we argue that the largely uncritical acceptance of the concept of ‘celebrating diversity’ as an inherently ‘good thing’, has undermined Universalist approaches to ethics within social work. That is not to say that assertions of the function of social work are not based on universal principles; the problem lies in the way that these are often proffered alongside intimations to cultural relativism. A good illustration can be found in the definition of social work offered by the International Federation of Social Work which argues that whilst ‘The holistic focus of social work is universal, the priorities of social work practice will vary from country to country and from time to time depending on cultural, historical, and socio-economic conditions’ (IFSW, 2000, Para 5). Whilst the IFSW is perhaps not as guilty as some, it is precisely this kind of dualistic thinking that seeks to cover all possibilities that we argue has led to confusion amongst practitioners, particularly when working with service users from different cultural, religious or ethnic backgrounds.",
    author = "Gurnam Singh and Stephen Cowden",
    note = "Used by permission of the Publishers from ‘Is cultural sensitivity always a good thing? Arguments for a universalist social work’, in Practical Social Work Ethics eds. Malcolm Carey and Lorraine Green (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013), pp. 63–81. Copyright {\circledC} 2013",
    year = "2013",
    month = "8",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-1-4094-3825-0",
    pages = "63--81",
    editor = "Malcolm Carey and Lorraine Green",
    booktitle = "Practical Social Work Ethics",
    publisher = "Ashgate",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Is cultural sensitivity always a good thing? Arguments for a universalist social work

    AU - Singh, Gurnam

    AU - Cowden, Stephen

    N1 - Used by permission of the Publishers from ‘Is cultural sensitivity always a good thing? Arguments for a universalist social work’, in Practical Social Work Ethics eds. Malcolm Carey and Lorraine Green (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013), pp. 63–81. Copyright © 2013

    PY - 2013/8

    Y1 - 2013/8

    N2 - The requirement for social workers to be sensitive to cultural difference has now become accepted as an essential component of best practice -‒ indeed, social workers failing to display sensitivity to cultural differences would most likely be seen to be in contravention of most professional ethics frameworks. However, closer scrutiny as to exactly how and to what degree one should display cultural sensitivity in practice reveals a complex set of ethical and philosophical dilemmas for social workers; and this is the main focus of this chapter. Specifically, we argue that the largely uncritical acceptance of the concept of ‘celebrating diversity’ as an inherently ‘good thing’, has undermined Universalist approaches to ethics within social work. That is not to say that assertions of the function of social work are not based on universal principles; the problem lies in the way that these are often proffered alongside intimations to cultural relativism. A good illustration can be found in the definition of social work offered by the International Federation of Social Work which argues that whilst ‘The holistic focus of social work is universal, the priorities of social work practice will vary from country to country and from time to time depending on cultural, historical, and socio-economic conditions’ (IFSW, 2000, Para 5). Whilst the IFSW is perhaps not as guilty as some, it is precisely this kind of dualistic thinking that seeks to cover all possibilities that we argue has led to confusion amongst practitioners, particularly when working with service users from different cultural, religious or ethnic backgrounds.

    AB - The requirement for social workers to be sensitive to cultural difference has now become accepted as an essential component of best practice -‒ indeed, social workers failing to display sensitivity to cultural differences would most likely be seen to be in contravention of most professional ethics frameworks. However, closer scrutiny as to exactly how and to what degree one should display cultural sensitivity in practice reveals a complex set of ethical and philosophical dilemmas for social workers; and this is the main focus of this chapter. Specifically, we argue that the largely uncritical acceptance of the concept of ‘celebrating diversity’ as an inherently ‘good thing’, has undermined Universalist approaches to ethics within social work. That is not to say that assertions of the function of social work are not based on universal principles; the problem lies in the way that these are often proffered alongside intimations to cultural relativism. A good illustration can be found in the definition of social work offered by the International Federation of Social Work which argues that whilst ‘The holistic focus of social work is universal, the priorities of social work practice will vary from country to country and from time to time depending on cultural, historical, and socio-economic conditions’ (IFSW, 2000, Para 5). Whilst the IFSW is perhaps not as guilty as some, it is precisely this kind of dualistic thinking that seeks to cover all possibilities that we argue has led to confusion amongst practitioners, particularly when working with service users from different cultural, religious or ethnic backgrounds.

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 978-1-4094-3825-0

    SP - 63

    EP - 81

    BT - Practical Social Work Ethics

    A2 - Carey, Malcolm

    A2 - Green, Lorraine

    PB - Ashgate

    CY - Farnham, Surrey

    ER -