IP, Disability, Culture and Exceptionalism: Does copyright law deal with difference?

Charlotte Waelde, abbe brown

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the extent to which human rights laws relating to disability and copyright conflict or complement each other. Does copyright consider itself lex specialis? If one sees the human rights and disability treaties as governing only general obligations, and copyright the specific, does copyright override what human rights and disability would otherwise dictate? Focusing on two case studies which involve human rights from different perspectives – one considers creation (the disabled dancer and her dance), and one considers use (people with visual impairments and access to books) – this chapter will look to developments in policy, international instruments, European and some domestic (UK) law to explore the relationship between these areas of law. Both creators and users of copyright works have an interest in the human rights and disability instruments and activism, and the agenda which results. Consider a choreographer and dancer with disability, who is recognised as a leader in the field of dance, or blind or partially sighted person wishing to access and enjoy the latest books in the bestseller list.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIntellectual Property and General Legal Principles
Subtitle of host publicationIs IP a Lex Specialis
EditorsGraeme Dinwoodie
Place of PublicationUK and US
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Chapter11
Pages215-246
Number of pages32
ISBN (Print)9781784714949
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

human rights
disability
Law
dance
visual impairment
treaty
obligation
leader
human being

Cite this

Waelde, C., & brown, A. (2015). IP, Disability, Culture and Exceptionalism: Does copyright law deal with difference? In G. Dinwoodie (Ed.), Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles: Is IP a Lex Specialis (pp. 215-246). UK and US: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784714956

IP, Disability, Culture and Exceptionalism : Does copyright law deal with difference? / Waelde, Charlotte; brown, abbe.

Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles: Is IP a Lex Specialis. ed. / Graeme Dinwoodie. UK and US : Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2015. p. 215-246.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Waelde, C & brown, A 2015, IP, Disability, Culture and Exceptionalism: Does copyright law deal with difference? in G Dinwoodie (ed.), Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles: Is IP a Lex Specialis. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., UK and US, pp. 215-246. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784714956
Waelde C, brown A. IP, Disability, Culture and Exceptionalism: Does copyright law deal with difference? In Dinwoodie G, editor, Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles: Is IP a Lex Specialis. UK and US: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 2015. p. 215-246 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784714956
Waelde, Charlotte ; brown, abbe. / IP, Disability, Culture and Exceptionalism : Does copyright law deal with difference?. Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles: Is IP a Lex Specialis. editor / Graeme Dinwoodie. UK and US : Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2015. pp. 215-246
@inbook{c472ed58bc11422ebbedbda557594d2d,
title = "IP, Disability, Culture and Exceptionalism: Does copyright law deal with difference?",
abstract = "This chapter explores the extent to which human rights laws relating to disability and copyright conflict or complement each other. Does copyright consider itself lex specialis? If one sees the human rights and disability treaties as governing only general obligations, and copyright the specific, does copyright override what human rights and disability would otherwise dictate? Focusing on two case studies which involve human rights from different perspectives – one considers creation (the disabled dancer and her dance), and one considers use (people with visual impairments and access to books) – this chapter will look to developments in policy, international instruments, European and some domestic (UK) law to explore the relationship between these areas of law. Both creators and users of copyright works have an interest in the human rights and disability instruments and activism, and the agenda which results. Consider a choreographer and dancer with disability, who is recognised as a leader in the field of dance, or blind or partially sighted person wishing to access and enjoy the latest books in the bestseller list.",
author = "Charlotte Waelde and abbe brown",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.4337/9781784714956",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781784714949",
pages = "215--246",
editor = "Graeme Dinwoodie",
booktitle = "Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - IP, Disability, Culture and Exceptionalism

T2 - Does copyright law deal with difference?

AU - Waelde, Charlotte

AU - brown, abbe

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This chapter explores the extent to which human rights laws relating to disability and copyright conflict or complement each other. Does copyright consider itself lex specialis? If one sees the human rights and disability treaties as governing only general obligations, and copyright the specific, does copyright override what human rights and disability would otherwise dictate? Focusing on two case studies which involve human rights from different perspectives – one considers creation (the disabled dancer and her dance), and one considers use (people with visual impairments and access to books) – this chapter will look to developments in policy, international instruments, European and some domestic (UK) law to explore the relationship between these areas of law. Both creators and users of copyright works have an interest in the human rights and disability instruments and activism, and the agenda which results. Consider a choreographer and dancer with disability, who is recognised as a leader in the field of dance, or blind or partially sighted person wishing to access and enjoy the latest books in the bestseller list.

AB - This chapter explores the extent to which human rights laws relating to disability and copyright conflict or complement each other. Does copyright consider itself lex specialis? If one sees the human rights and disability treaties as governing only general obligations, and copyright the specific, does copyright override what human rights and disability would otherwise dictate? Focusing on two case studies which involve human rights from different perspectives – one considers creation (the disabled dancer and her dance), and one considers use (people with visual impairments and access to books) – this chapter will look to developments in policy, international instruments, European and some domestic (UK) law to explore the relationship between these areas of law. Both creators and users of copyright works have an interest in the human rights and disability instruments and activism, and the agenda which results. Consider a choreographer and dancer with disability, who is recognised as a leader in the field of dance, or blind or partially sighted person wishing to access and enjoy the latest books in the bestseller list.

U2 - 10.4337/9781784714956

DO - 10.4337/9781784714956

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781784714949

SP - 215

EP - 246

BT - Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles

A2 - Dinwoodie, Graeme

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

CY - UK and US

ER -