TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigating tree planting in Ethiopia and the extent to which scheme implementation aligns with good governance practices
AU - Yitbarek, Tibebe Weldesemaet
AU - Wilson, John R.U.
AU - Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina
N1 - © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Tree planting schemes are implemented to achieve social, cultural, economic, and environmental goals. Various frameworks and guidelines outline good governance practices to aid the achievement of these goals. However, there is rarely sufficient monitoring and reporting of tree planting schemes for it to be possible to determine whether schemes adhere to good governance practices. Here, we assessed the performance of 16 tree planting schemes in Ethiopia using focus group discussions with local communities, interviews with scheme managers and beneficiaries, remote sensing, and reviewing official documentation. We used a qualitative comparative case study approach to analyse (1) implementation adherence to three standard tools and guidelines, (2) legitimacy of schemes through beneficiary satisfaction, and (3) delivery of socioeconomic and environmental outputs. We found that most tree planting schemes did not adhere to the implementation guidelines but that those that did perform better by securing legitimacy and delivering their targeted outputs. We contend that an integrated performance assessment is vital to check whether a tree planting scheme has good governance practice and ultimately is sustainable.
AB - Tree planting schemes are implemented to achieve social, cultural, economic, and environmental goals. Various frameworks and guidelines outline good governance practices to aid the achievement of these goals. However, there is rarely sufficient monitoring and reporting of tree planting schemes for it to be possible to determine whether schemes adhere to good governance practices. Here, we assessed the performance of 16 tree planting schemes in Ethiopia using focus group discussions with local communities, interviews with scheme managers and beneficiaries, remote sensing, and reviewing official documentation. We used a qualitative comparative case study approach to analyse (1) implementation adherence to three standard tools and guidelines, (2) legitimacy of schemes through beneficiary satisfaction, and (3) delivery of socioeconomic and environmental outputs. We found that most tree planting schemes did not adhere to the implementation guidelines but that those that did perform better by securing legitimacy and delivering their targeted outputs. We contend that an integrated performance assessment is vital to check whether a tree planting scheme has good governance practice and ultimately is sustainable.
KW - Implementation tools
KW - Legitimacy
KW - Remote sensing
KW - Socioeconomic
KW - Environmental outputs
KW - Africa
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85211092042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123475
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123475
M3 - Article
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 373
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
M1 - 123475
ER -