Interpreting “cumulative extremism”: Six proposals for enhancing conceptual clarity

Joel Busher, Graham Macklin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The concept of “cumulative extremism”—described in 2006 by Roger Eatwell as “the way in which one form of extremism can feed off and magnify other forms [of extremism],” has recently gained considerable traction in academic, policy, and practitioner discourses about extremism. Yet in spite of the growing usage of the term, particularly in analyses of the dynamic between extreme Islamist and extreme Right-Wing or anti-Muslim protest groups, there has to date been scant interrogation of the concept itself or of its application. In this article, we make a series of six proposals as to how we might enhance the conceptual clarity of these conversations about “cumulative extremism.” Our aim in doing so is to increase the likelihood that the concept might become a useful addition to the debates on extremism rather than becoming, to borrow a term from John Horgan—something of an “explanatory fiction”—an idea that appears to enable us to explain a great deal, but whose explanatory value is largely lost because there is insufficient scrutiny of the claims that it is used to make and whose liberal application becomes increasingly conducive to poor science.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)884-905
Number of pages22
JournalTerrorism and Political Violence
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

radicalism
protest
Muslim
conversation
discourse
science
Group

Keywords

  • cumulative extremism
  • English Defence League
  • escalation
  • extreme Islamists
  • extreme Right-Wing
  • polarization
  • radicalisation

Cite this

Interpreting “cumulative extremism” : Six proposals for enhancing conceptual clarity. / Busher, Joel; Macklin, Graham.

In: Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2015, p. 884-905.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d00087874514b8cab8b3a8eef539a93,
title = "Interpreting “cumulative extremism”: Six proposals for enhancing conceptual clarity",
abstract = "The concept of “cumulative extremism”—described in 2006 by Roger Eatwell as “the way in which one form of extremism can feed off and magnify other forms [of extremism],” has recently gained considerable traction in academic, policy, and practitioner discourses about extremism. Yet in spite of the growing usage of the term, particularly in analyses of the dynamic between extreme Islamist and extreme Right-Wing or anti-Muslim protest groups, there has to date been scant interrogation of the concept itself or of its application. In this article, we make a series of six proposals as to how we might enhance the conceptual clarity of these conversations about “cumulative extremism.” Our aim in doing so is to increase the likelihood that the concept might become a useful addition to the debates on extremism rather than becoming, to borrow a term from John Horgan—something of an “explanatory fiction”—an idea that appears to enable us to explain a great deal, but whose explanatory value is largely lost because there is insufficient scrutiny of the claims that it is used to make and whose liberal application becomes increasingly conducive to poor science.",
keywords = "cumulative extremism, English Defence League, escalation, extreme Islamists, extreme Right-Wing, polarization, radicalisation",
author = "Joel Busher and Graham Macklin",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/09546553.2013.870556",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "884--905",
journal = "Terrorism and Political Violence",
issn = "0954-6553",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpreting “cumulative extremism”

T2 - Six proposals for enhancing conceptual clarity

AU - Busher, Joel

AU - Macklin, Graham

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The concept of “cumulative extremism”—described in 2006 by Roger Eatwell as “the way in which one form of extremism can feed off and magnify other forms [of extremism],” has recently gained considerable traction in academic, policy, and practitioner discourses about extremism. Yet in spite of the growing usage of the term, particularly in analyses of the dynamic between extreme Islamist and extreme Right-Wing or anti-Muslim protest groups, there has to date been scant interrogation of the concept itself or of its application. In this article, we make a series of six proposals as to how we might enhance the conceptual clarity of these conversations about “cumulative extremism.” Our aim in doing so is to increase the likelihood that the concept might become a useful addition to the debates on extremism rather than becoming, to borrow a term from John Horgan—something of an “explanatory fiction”—an idea that appears to enable us to explain a great deal, but whose explanatory value is largely lost because there is insufficient scrutiny of the claims that it is used to make and whose liberal application becomes increasingly conducive to poor science.

AB - The concept of “cumulative extremism”—described in 2006 by Roger Eatwell as “the way in which one form of extremism can feed off and magnify other forms [of extremism],” has recently gained considerable traction in academic, policy, and practitioner discourses about extremism. Yet in spite of the growing usage of the term, particularly in analyses of the dynamic between extreme Islamist and extreme Right-Wing or anti-Muslim protest groups, there has to date been scant interrogation of the concept itself or of its application. In this article, we make a series of six proposals as to how we might enhance the conceptual clarity of these conversations about “cumulative extremism.” Our aim in doing so is to increase the likelihood that the concept might become a useful addition to the debates on extremism rather than becoming, to borrow a term from John Horgan—something of an “explanatory fiction”—an idea that appears to enable us to explain a great deal, but whose explanatory value is largely lost because there is insufficient scrutiny of the claims that it is used to make and whose liberal application becomes increasingly conducive to poor science.

KW - cumulative extremism

KW - English Defence League

KW - escalation

KW - extreme Islamists

KW - extreme Right-Wing

KW - polarization

KW - radicalisation

U2 - 10.1080/09546553.2013.870556

DO - 10.1080/09546553.2013.870556

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 884

EP - 905

JO - Terrorism and Political Violence

JF - Terrorism and Political Violence

SN - 0954-6553

IS - 5

ER -