Institutions and governance of communal rangelands in South Africa

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    8 Citations (Scopus)
    59 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The creation of local institutions with a mandate over land access and control is seen as a prerequisite for successful decentralisation of land tenure and effective local resource management in sub-Saharan Africa. However, with land tenure reform in South Africa currently at a state of legislative impasse, real uncertainty now exists over land rights and governance of rangeland in many communal areas. This paper draws on case study material from Eastern Cape province to illustrate how this ongoing uncertainty has resulted in the operation of a range of traditional authority and civil society institutions in different communal areas with varying degrees of legitimate authority over land administration and highly variable performance in managing rangeland resources. Collective management of rangeland resources seems most difficult in environments where land rights are contested because of the coexistence of traditional leaders and civil society institutions. On this basis an approach to tenure reform is advocated, which vests all powers over local land administration in democratically elected and accountable civil society institutions. Some successful examples of this already exist and might serve to guide policy formation, which must be flexible enough to accommodate collective management approaches that emphasise cooperation both within and between communities.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)77-83
    JournalAfrican Journal of Range and Forage Science
    Volume30
    Issue number1-2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    governance
    civil society
    rangeland
    rangelands
    land rights
    land tenure
    South Africa
    uncertainty
    politics
    range management
    natural resource management
    Sub-Saharan Africa
    resource
    decentralization
    coexistence
    resource management
    case studies
    Africa
    land

    Bibliographical note

    This is the accepted, peer reviewed manuscript of an article whose final and definitive form has been published in African Journal of Range and Forage Science 2013, 30 (1-2): 77-83 © 2013 copyright NISC (Pty) Ltd. The African Journal of Range and Forage Science is available online at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tarf

    Keywords

    • common property
    • land tenure
    • natural resource management
    • traditional leaders

    Cite this

    Institutions and governance of communal rangelands in South Africa. / Bennett, James.

    In: African Journal of Range and Forage Science, Vol. 30, No. 1-2, 2013, p. 77-83.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{d7c705d229484503a40f65ad663e199a,
    title = "Institutions and governance of communal rangelands in South Africa",
    abstract = "The creation of local institutions with a mandate over land access and control is seen as a prerequisite for successful decentralisation of land tenure and effective local resource management in sub-Saharan Africa. However, with land tenure reform in South Africa currently at a state of legislative impasse, real uncertainty now exists over land rights and governance of rangeland in many communal areas. This paper draws on case study material from Eastern Cape province to illustrate how this ongoing uncertainty has resulted in the operation of a range of traditional authority and civil society institutions in different communal areas with varying degrees of legitimate authority over land administration and highly variable performance in managing rangeland resources. Collective management of rangeland resources seems most difficult in environments where land rights are contested because of the coexistence of traditional leaders and civil society institutions. On this basis an approach to tenure reform is advocated, which vests all powers over local land administration in democratically elected and accountable civil society institutions. Some successful examples of this already exist and might serve to guide policy formation, which must be flexible enough to accommodate collective management approaches that emphasise cooperation both within and between communities.",
    keywords = "common property, land tenure, natural resource management, traditional leaders",
    author = "James Bennett",
    note = "This is the accepted, peer reviewed manuscript of an article whose final and definitive form has been published in African Journal of Range and Forage Science 2013, 30 (1-2): 77-83 {\circledC} 2013 copyright NISC (Pty) Ltd. The African Journal of Range and Forage Science is available online at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tarf",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.2989/10220119.2013.776634",
    language = "English",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "77--83",
    journal = "African Journal of Range and Forage Science",
    issn = "1022-0119",
    publisher = "National Inquiry Services Centre",
    number = "1-2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Institutions and governance of communal rangelands in South Africa

    AU - Bennett, James

    N1 - This is the accepted, peer reviewed manuscript of an article whose final and definitive form has been published in African Journal of Range and Forage Science 2013, 30 (1-2): 77-83 © 2013 copyright NISC (Pty) Ltd. The African Journal of Range and Forage Science is available online at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tarf

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - The creation of local institutions with a mandate over land access and control is seen as a prerequisite for successful decentralisation of land tenure and effective local resource management in sub-Saharan Africa. However, with land tenure reform in South Africa currently at a state of legislative impasse, real uncertainty now exists over land rights and governance of rangeland in many communal areas. This paper draws on case study material from Eastern Cape province to illustrate how this ongoing uncertainty has resulted in the operation of a range of traditional authority and civil society institutions in different communal areas with varying degrees of legitimate authority over land administration and highly variable performance in managing rangeland resources. Collective management of rangeland resources seems most difficult in environments where land rights are contested because of the coexistence of traditional leaders and civil society institutions. On this basis an approach to tenure reform is advocated, which vests all powers over local land administration in democratically elected and accountable civil society institutions. Some successful examples of this already exist and might serve to guide policy formation, which must be flexible enough to accommodate collective management approaches that emphasise cooperation both within and between communities.

    AB - The creation of local institutions with a mandate over land access and control is seen as a prerequisite for successful decentralisation of land tenure and effective local resource management in sub-Saharan Africa. However, with land tenure reform in South Africa currently at a state of legislative impasse, real uncertainty now exists over land rights and governance of rangeland in many communal areas. This paper draws on case study material from Eastern Cape province to illustrate how this ongoing uncertainty has resulted in the operation of a range of traditional authority and civil society institutions in different communal areas with varying degrees of legitimate authority over land administration and highly variable performance in managing rangeland resources. Collective management of rangeland resources seems most difficult in environments where land rights are contested because of the coexistence of traditional leaders and civil society institutions. On this basis an approach to tenure reform is advocated, which vests all powers over local land administration in democratically elected and accountable civil society institutions. Some successful examples of this already exist and might serve to guide policy formation, which must be flexible enough to accommodate collective management approaches that emphasise cooperation both within and between communities.

    KW - common property

    KW - land tenure

    KW - natural resource management

    KW - traditional leaders

    U2 - 10.2989/10220119.2013.776634

    DO - 10.2989/10220119.2013.776634

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 77

    EP - 83

    JO - African Journal of Range and Forage Science

    JF - African Journal of Range and Forage Science

    SN - 1022-0119

    IS - 1-2

    ER -