Inequalities in child welfare: An inverse care law?

Geraldine M. Brady, Paul Bywaters, Tim Sparks, Elizabeth Bos

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

    Abstract

    This paper develops the theme of the relationship between deprivation and inequalities in child welfare, which is the subject of other presentations at this conference. It has long been established that deprivation is the main factor explaining differences between local councils in England in the proportion of children on child protection plans or in out-of-home public care. However, greater research, policy and practice attention has been paid to factors other than deprivation in trying to address inequalities in children’s chances of being on the receiving end of safeguarding interventions. Issues of service structures, management, quality control and front line practice have all been the subject of extensive scrutiny. Recent evidence from England which reinforces the central relationship with deprivation, nevertheless also shows large variations between local councils for children from neighbourhoods with equivalent levels of deprivation. In other words, variations in practice are also significant. The analysis of data for children on child protection plans or in out-of-home care suggests that children living in more affluent councils, and in more affluent areas within councils, may be more likely to be subject to safeguarding interventions for a given level of need than children in more deprived councils or areas. This might imply the equivalent for child welfare services of the long established inverse care law in health: better off children have a greater chance of receiving safeguarding services than poorer children. Greater attention should be paid to understanding these structural inequalities and to equalising children’s chances of receiving good opportunities for development.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationUnknown Host Publication
    Publication statusPublished - 2014
    EventJoint World Conference on Social Work, Education and Social Development - Melbourne, Australia
    Duration: 9 Jul 201414 Jul 2014

    Conference

    ConferenceJoint World Conference on Social Work, Education and Social Development
    CountryAustralia
    CityMelbourne
    Period9/07/1414/07/14

    Fingerprint

    child welfare
    deprivation
    Law
    child protection
    quality control
    research policy
    research practice
    home care
    health
    management
    evidence

    Bibliographical note

    The full text of this item is not available from the repository.

    Keywords

    • deprivation
    • inequality
    • child welfare
    • social work
    • UK

    Cite this

    Brady, G. M., Bywaters, P., Sparks, T., & Bos, E. (2014). Inequalities in child welfare: An inverse care law? In Unknown Host Publication

    Inequalities in child welfare: An inverse care law? / Brady, Geraldine M.; Bywaters, Paul; Sparks, Tim; Bos, Elizabeth.

    Unknown Host Publication. 2014.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

    Brady, GM, Bywaters, P, Sparks, T & Bos, E 2014, Inequalities in child welfare: An inverse care law? in Unknown Host Publication. Joint World Conference on Social Work, Education and Social Development, Melbourne, Australia, 9/07/14.
    Brady GM, Bywaters P, Sparks T, Bos E. Inequalities in child welfare: An inverse care law? In Unknown Host Publication. 2014
    Brady, Geraldine M. ; Bywaters, Paul ; Sparks, Tim ; Bos, Elizabeth. / Inequalities in child welfare: An inverse care law?. Unknown Host Publication. 2014.
    @inproceedings{b155d1f5c7114854b662b40a0cce120f,
    title = "Inequalities in child welfare: An inverse care law?",
    abstract = "This paper develops the theme of the relationship between deprivation and inequalities in child welfare, which is the subject of other presentations at this conference. It has long been established that deprivation is the main factor explaining differences between local councils in England in the proportion of children on child protection plans or in out-of-home public care. However, greater research, policy and practice attention has been paid to factors other than deprivation in trying to address inequalities in children’s chances of being on the receiving end of safeguarding interventions. Issues of service structures, management, quality control and front line practice have all been the subject of extensive scrutiny. Recent evidence from England which reinforces the central relationship with deprivation, nevertheless also shows large variations between local councils for children from neighbourhoods with equivalent levels of deprivation. In other words, variations in practice are also significant. The analysis of data for children on child protection plans or in out-of-home care suggests that children living in more affluent councils, and in more affluent areas within councils, may be more likely to be subject to safeguarding interventions for a given level of need than children in more deprived councils or areas. This might imply the equivalent for child welfare services of the long established inverse care law in health: better off children have a greater chance of receiving safeguarding services than poorer children. Greater attention should be paid to understanding these structural inequalities and to equalising children’s chances of receiving good opportunities for development.",
    keywords = "deprivation, inequality, child welfare, social work, UK",
    author = "Brady, {Geraldine M.} and Paul Bywaters and Tim Sparks and Elizabeth Bos",
    note = "The full text of this item is not available from the repository.",
    year = "2014",
    language = "English",
    booktitle = "Unknown Host Publication",

    }

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Inequalities in child welfare: An inverse care law?

    AU - Brady, Geraldine M.

    AU - Bywaters, Paul

    AU - Sparks, Tim

    AU - Bos, Elizabeth

    N1 - The full text of this item is not available from the repository.

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - This paper develops the theme of the relationship between deprivation and inequalities in child welfare, which is the subject of other presentations at this conference. It has long been established that deprivation is the main factor explaining differences between local councils in England in the proportion of children on child protection plans or in out-of-home public care. However, greater research, policy and practice attention has been paid to factors other than deprivation in trying to address inequalities in children’s chances of being on the receiving end of safeguarding interventions. Issues of service structures, management, quality control and front line practice have all been the subject of extensive scrutiny. Recent evidence from England which reinforces the central relationship with deprivation, nevertheless also shows large variations between local councils for children from neighbourhoods with equivalent levels of deprivation. In other words, variations in practice are also significant. The analysis of data for children on child protection plans or in out-of-home care suggests that children living in more affluent councils, and in more affluent areas within councils, may be more likely to be subject to safeguarding interventions for a given level of need than children in more deprived councils or areas. This might imply the equivalent for child welfare services of the long established inverse care law in health: better off children have a greater chance of receiving safeguarding services than poorer children. Greater attention should be paid to understanding these structural inequalities and to equalising children’s chances of receiving good opportunities for development.

    AB - This paper develops the theme of the relationship between deprivation and inequalities in child welfare, which is the subject of other presentations at this conference. It has long been established that deprivation is the main factor explaining differences between local councils in England in the proportion of children on child protection plans or in out-of-home public care. However, greater research, policy and practice attention has been paid to factors other than deprivation in trying to address inequalities in children’s chances of being on the receiving end of safeguarding interventions. Issues of service structures, management, quality control and front line practice have all been the subject of extensive scrutiny. Recent evidence from England which reinforces the central relationship with deprivation, nevertheless also shows large variations between local councils for children from neighbourhoods with equivalent levels of deprivation. In other words, variations in practice are also significant. The analysis of data for children on child protection plans or in out-of-home care suggests that children living in more affluent councils, and in more affluent areas within councils, may be more likely to be subject to safeguarding interventions for a given level of need than children in more deprived councils or areas. This might imply the equivalent for child welfare services of the long established inverse care law in health: better off children have a greater chance of receiving safeguarding services than poorer children. Greater attention should be paid to understanding these structural inequalities and to equalising children’s chances of receiving good opportunities for development.

    KW - deprivation

    KW - inequality

    KW - child welfare

    KW - social work

    KW - UK

    M3 - Conference proceeding

    BT - Unknown Host Publication

    ER -