Industry concentration and the cross-section of stock returns: Evidence from the UK

Larry Su, Nawar Hashem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the relationship between market structure and ex- pected stock returns in the London Stock Exchange during 1985 and 2010. Using Fama- MacBeth regressions, we find that industry concentration is negatively related to average stock returns, even after controlling for beta, size, book-to-market equity, momentum, and leverage. In addition, there is a strong evidence of a growth effect. Firms or industry portfolios with smaller book-to-market ratios have significantly higher returns. In contrast, beta is never statistically significant. The above results are robust to firm- and industry- level regressions, and the formation of firms into 100 size-beta portfolios. Our findings indicate that competitive industries earn, on average, higher risk-adjusted returns than concentrated industries. An explanation is that investors in more competitive industries require larger premiums for greater distress risks associated with these industries. Our paper is one of the first to link market competition with the average stock returns in the UK, and contributes to the asset pricing literature by extending the evidence from the US to another important financial market.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)769-785
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Business Economics and Management
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2015

Fingerprint

Industry
Cross-section of stock returns
Industry concentration
Stock returns
Market structure
Equity
Book-to-market
London Stock Exchange
Investors
Book-to-market ratio
Asset pricing
Market competition
Leverage
Financial markets
Distress
Risk-adjusted returns
Momentum
Premium

Keywords

  • industry concentration
  • stock returns
  • market structure
  • distress risk
  • asset pricing
  • London stock exchange

Cite this

Industry concentration and the cross-section of stock returns: Evidence from the UK. / Su, Larry; Hashem, Nawar.

In: Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, 09.2015, p. 769-785.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d0065c5f9e114ea692aea7122ccdbb96,
title = "Industry concentration and the cross-section of stock returns: Evidence from the UK",
abstract = "In this paper, we examine the relationship between market structure and ex- pected stock returns in the London Stock Exchange during 1985 and 2010. Using Fama- MacBeth regressions, we find that industry concentration is negatively related to average stock returns, even after controlling for beta, size, book-to-market equity, momentum, and leverage. In addition, there is a strong evidence of a growth effect. Firms or industry portfolios with smaller book-to-market ratios have significantly higher returns. In contrast, beta is never statistically significant. The above results are robust to firm- and industry- level regressions, and the formation of firms into 100 size-beta portfolios. Our findings indicate that competitive industries earn, on average, higher risk-adjusted returns than concentrated industries. An explanation is that investors in more competitive industries require larger premiums for greater distress risks associated with these industries. Our paper is one of the first to link market competition with the average stock returns in the UK, and contributes to the asset pricing literature by extending the evidence from the US to another important financial market.",
keywords = "industry concentration, stock returns, market structure, distress risk, asset pricing, London stock exchange",
author = "Larry Su and Nawar Hashem",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
doi = "10.3846/16111699.2013.833547",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "769--785",
journal = "Journal of Business Economics and Management",
issn = "1611-1699",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Industry concentration and the cross-section of stock returns: Evidence from the UK

AU - Su, Larry

AU - Hashem, Nawar

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - In this paper, we examine the relationship between market structure and ex- pected stock returns in the London Stock Exchange during 1985 and 2010. Using Fama- MacBeth regressions, we find that industry concentration is negatively related to average stock returns, even after controlling for beta, size, book-to-market equity, momentum, and leverage. In addition, there is a strong evidence of a growth effect. Firms or industry portfolios with smaller book-to-market ratios have significantly higher returns. In contrast, beta is never statistically significant. The above results are robust to firm- and industry- level regressions, and the formation of firms into 100 size-beta portfolios. Our findings indicate that competitive industries earn, on average, higher risk-adjusted returns than concentrated industries. An explanation is that investors in more competitive industries require larger premiums for greater distress risks associated with these industries. Our paper is one of the first to link market competition with the average stock returns in the UK, and contributes to the asset pricing literature by extending the evidence from the US to another important financial market.

AB - In this paper, we examine the relationship between market structure and ex- pected stock returns in the London Stock Exchange during 1985 and 2010. Using Fama- MacBeth regressions, we find that industry concentration is negatively related to average stock returns, even after controlling for beta, size, book-to-market equity, momentum, and leverage. In addition, there is a strong evidence of a growth effect. Firms or industry portfolios with smaller book-to-market ratios have significantly higher returns. In contrast, beta is never statistically significant. The above results are robust to firm- and industry- level regressions, and the formation of firms into 100 size-beta portfolios. Our findings indicate that competitive industries earn, on average, higher risk-adjusted returns than concentrated industries. An explanation is that investors in more competitive industries require larger premiums for greater distress risks associated with these industries. Our paper is one of the first to link market competition with the average stock returns in the UK, and contributes to the asset pricing literature by extending the evidence from the US to another important financial market.

KW - industry concentration

KW - stock returns

KW - market structure

KW - distress risk

KW - asset pricing

KW - London stock exchange

U2 - 10.3846/16111699.2013.833547

DO - 10.3846/16111699.2013.833547

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 769

EP - 785

JO - Journal of Business Economics and Management

JF - Journal of Business Economics and Management

SN - 1611-1699

IS - 4

ER -