Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings

Edwin Zea Escamilla, Guillaume Habert, juan francisco correal daza, Hector Archila Santos, Juan Sebastian Echeverry Fernández, David Trujillo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The past five decades have witnessed an unprecedented growth in population. This has led to an ever-growing housing demand. It has been proposed that the use of bio-based materials, and specifically bamboo, can help alleviate the housing demand in a sustainable manner. The present paper aims to assess the environmental impact caused by using four different construction materials (bamboo, brick, concrete hollow block, and engineered bamboo) in buildings. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was carried out to measure the environmental impact of the different construction materials in the construction of single and multi-storey buildings. The LCA considered the extraction,
production, transport, and use of the construction materials. The IPCC2013 evaluation method from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC2013 was used for the calculations of CO2 emissions. The assessment was geographically located in Colombia, South America, and estimates the transport distances of the construction materials. The results show that transportation and
reinforcing materials significantly contribute to the environmental impact, whereas the engineered bamboo construction system has the lowest environmental impact. The adoption of bamboo-based construction systems has a significant potential to support the regenerative development of regions
where they could be used and might lead to long-lasting improvements to economies, environments, and livelihoods.
LanguageEnglish
Article number3096
Number of pages14
JournalSustainability
Volume10
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

life cycle assessment
Bamboo
bamboo
Life cycle
building
life cycle
Environmental impact
environmental impact
Concrete blocks
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
housing
Brick
Climate change
demand
Colombia
livelihood
climate change
economy
evaluation

Bibliographical note

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Keywords

  • bamboo
  • glue-laminated bamboo
  • Life cycle assessment
  • CO2

Cite this

Zea Escamilla, E., Habert, G., correal daza, J. F., Archila Santos, H., Echeverry Fernández, J. S., & Trujillo, D. (2018). Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings. Sustainability, 10(9), [3096]. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093096

Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings. / Zea Escamilla, Edwin ; Habert, Guillaume; correal daza, juan francisco; Archila Santos, Hector; Echeverry Fernández, Juan Sebastian; Trujillo, David.

In: Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 9, 3096, 30.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zea Escamilla, E, Habert, G, correal daza, JF, Archila Santos, H, Echeverry Fernández, JS & Trujillo, D 2018, 'Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings', Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 9, 3096. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093096
Zea Escamilla E, Habert G, correal daza JF, Archila Santos H, Echeverry Fernández JS, Trujillo D. Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings. Sustainability. 2018 Aug 30;10(9). 3096. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093096
Zea Escamilla, Edwin ; Habert, Guillaume ; correal daza, juan francisco ; Archila Santos, Hector ; Echeverry Fernández, Juan Sebastian ; Trujillo, David. / Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings. In: Sustainability. 2018 ; Vol. 10, No. 9.
@article{96659d1d7700478b95506d4a165e6108,
title = "Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings",
abstract = "The past five decades have witnessed an unprecedented growth in population. This has led to an ever-growing housing demand. It has been proposed that the use of bio-based materials, and specifically bamboo, can help alleviate the housing demand in a sustainable manner. The present paper aims to assess the environmental impact caused by using four different construction materials (bamboo, brick, concrete hollow block, and engineered bamboo) in buildings. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was carried out to measure the environmental impact of the different construction materials in the construction of single and multi-storey buildings. The LCA considered the extraction,production, transport, and use of the construction materials. The IPCC2013 evaluation method from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC2013 was used for the calculations of CO2 emissions. The assessment was geographically located in Colombia, South America, and estimates the transport distances of the construction materials. The results show that transportation andreinforcing materials significantly contribute to the environmental impact, whereas the engineered bamboo construction system has the lowest environmental impact. The adoption of bamboo-based construction systems has a significant potential to support the regenerative development of regionswhere they could be used and might lead to long-lasting improvements to economies, environments, and livelihoods.",
keywords = "bamboo, glue-laminated bamboo, Life cycle assessment, CO2",
author = "{Zea Escamilla}, Edwin and Guillaume Habert and {correal daza}, {juan francisco} and {Archila Santos}, Hector and {Echeverry Fern{\'a}ndez}, {Juan Sebastian} and David Trujillo",
note = "This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "30",
doi = "10.3390/su10093096",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings

AU - Zea Escamilla, Edwin

AU - Habert, Guillaume

AU - correal daza, juan francisco

AU - Archila Santos, Hector

AU - Echeverry Fernández, Juan Sebastian

AU - Trujillo, David

N1 - This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

PY - 2018/8/30

Y1 - 2018/8/30

N2 - The past five decades have witnessed an unprecedented growth in population. This has led to an ever-growing housing demand. It has been proposed that the use of bio-based materials, and specifically bamboo, can help alleviate the housing demand in a sustainable manner. The present paper aims to assess the environmental impact caused by using four different construction materials (bamboo, brick, concrete hollow block, and engineered bamboo) in buildings. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was carried out to measure the environmental impact of the different construction materials in the construction of single and multi-storey buildings. The LCA considered the extraction,production, transport, and use of the construction materials. The IPCC2013 evaluation method from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC2013 was used for the calculations of CO2 emissions. The assessment was geographically located in Colombia, South America, and estimates the transport distances of the construction materials. The results show that transportation andreinforcing materials significantly contribute to the environmental impact, whereas the engineered bamboo construction system has the lowest environmental impact. The adoption of bamboo-based construction systems has a significant potential to support the regenerative development of regionswhere they could be used and might lead to long-lasting improvements to economies, environments, and livelihoods.

AB - The past five decades have witnessed an unprecedented growth in population. This has led to an ever-growing housing demand. It has been proposed that the use of bio-based materials, and specifically bamboo, can help alleviate the housing demand in a sustainable manner. The present paper aims to assess the environmental impact caused by using four different construction materials (bamboo, brick, concrete hollow block, and engineered bamboo) in buildings. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was carried out to measure the environmental impact of the different construction materials in the construction of single and multi-storey buildings. The LCA considered the extraction,production, transport, and use of the construction materials. The IPCC2013 evaluation method from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC2013 was used for the calculations of CO2 emissions. The assessment was geographically located in Colombia, South America, and estimates the transport distances of the construction materials. The results show that transportation andreinforcing materials significantly contribute to the environmental impact, whereas the engineered bamboo construction system has the lowest environmental impact. The adoption of bamboo-based construction systems has a significant potential to support the regenerative development of regionswhere they could be used and might lead to long-lasting improvements to economies, environments, and livelihoods.

KW - bamboo

KW - glue-laminated bamboo

KW - Life cycle assessment

KW - CO2

U2 - 10.3390/su10093096

DO - 10.3390/su10093096

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Sustainability

T2 - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 9

M1 - 3096

ER -