Individual vs. Group-based Strategies for Weight Loss and Management in Adults: Pen-Profile Perspectives

    Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting Abstractpeer-review

    11 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    INTRODUCTION

    Obesity and overweightness are major public health concerns, particularly due to the association between non-communicable diseases and all-cause mortality. Furthermore, the financial burden imposed on the National Health Services, and wider society, because of overweightness is estimated at £27 billion. Despite the numerous support systems for, potential, weight loss, the advocating of group-based strategies has grown, yet inter-individual preferences and perceptions of weight-management strategies are less well known. The aim of this study was to explore perceptions of barriers, facilitators, strategies and successes to individual
    vs. group-based weight management programmes in overweight adults.

    METHODS

    A convenience sample of forty-two overweight (Body Mass Index ≥ 25-kg.m2) participants (aged 32-63y) volunteered to take part in this study. All participants subsequently completed a 3-month weight loss programme, dichotomised to a group-based (n=21), or self-monitoring (n=21) approach, respectively. At the conclusion of the 3-month period, all participants participated in a semi-structured interview (60±7 mins) to explore individual perceptions of barriers, facilitators, strategies and successes. Qualitative data were analysed using pen profiles, which were constructed from verbatim transcripts.

    RESULTS

    Convergent themes were found for individual and group strategies for facilitators (organisation and influence of cooking skills), strategies (freedom, enjoyment, and ease) and successes (self-control, health improvement and weight-loss). Divergent themes emerged between groups for barriers, group participants highlighted expense of commercial products, and knowledge of nutrition and dieting, whilst individual participants reported (lack of) social support from peers, (lack of) motivation, and occupation.

    CONCLUSION

    Whilst facilitators, strategies and successes related to individual vs group weight-loss approaches were comparable, divergent perceived barriers emerged. Therefore, it is recommended that key stakeholders, facilitators and individuals must consider these factors prior to the advocation any one-particular weight loss strategy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)S25
    Number of pages1
    JournalThe Lancet
    Volume392
    Issue numberSupplement 2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Individual vs. Group-based Strategies for Weight Loss and Management in Adults: Pen-Profile Perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this