Inclusive growth in English cities: mainstreamed or sidelined?

Paul Sissons, Anne Green, Kevin Broughton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    21 Citations (Scopus)
    136 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The concept of inclusive growth is increasingly presented as offering prospects for more equitable social outcomes. However, inclusive growth is subject to a variety of interpretations and lacks definitional clarity. In England, via devolution, cities are taking on new powers for policy domains that can influence inclusive growth outcomes. This opens up opportunities for innovation to address central issues of low pay and poverty. This paper examines the extent to which inclusive growth concerns form a central or peripheral aspect in this new devolution through the content analysis of devolution agreements. It concludes that inclusive growth concerns appear to be largely sidelined.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)435-446
    Number of pages12
    JournalRegional Studies
    Volume53
    Issue number3
    Early online date22 Oct 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2019

    Bibliographical note

    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Regional Studies, on (In-Press), available online: (In-Press)

    Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

    Keywords

    • cities
    • devolution
    • England
    • inclusive growth
    • ‘good jobs’

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Environmental Science(all)
    • Social Sciences(all)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Inclusive growth in English cities: mainstreamed or sidelined?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this