Impulse balance and framing effects in threshold public good games

Edward Cartwright, Anna Stepanova, Lian Xue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit the evidence for framing effects in threshold public good games. Our particular focus is on why the probability of providing the public good appears to be higher in positive, give frames compared with negative, take frames. We show that the impulse balance theory can explain this effect. We also report a new experiment designed to test the predictions of the impulse balance theory. The results of the experiment fit well, both in quantitative and qualitative terms, with our predictions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)903-922
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Public Economic Theory
Volume21
Issue number5
Early online date25 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

balance theory
experiment
evidence
Prediction
Impulse
Experiment
Framing effects

Bibliographical note

© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Public Economic Theory. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Finance

Cite this

Impulse balance and framing effects in threshold public good games. / Cartwright, Edward; Stepanova, Anna; Xue, Lian.

In: Journal of Public Economic Theory, Vol. 21, No. 5, 01.10.2019, p. 903-922.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{505c08986dcd484087a44ccfa9c3b79e,
title = "Impulse balance and framing effects in threshold public good games",
abstract = "In this paper, we revisit the evidence for framing effects in threshold public good games. Our particular focus is on why the probability of providing the public good appears to be higher in positive, give frames compared with negative, take frames. We show that the impulse balance theory can explain this effect. We also report a new experiment designed to test the predictions of the impulse balance theory. The results of the experiment fit well, both in quantitative and qualitative terms, with our predictions.",
author = "Edward Cartwright and Anna Stepanova and Lian Xue",
note = "{\circledC} 2019 The Authors. Journal of Public Economic Theory. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jpet.12359",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "903--922",
journal = "Journal of Public Economic Theory",
issn = "1467-9779",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impulse balance and framing effects in threshold public good games

AU - Cartwright, Edward

AU - Stepanova, Anna

AU - Xue, Lian

N1 - © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Public Economic Theory. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - In this paper, we revisit the evidence for framing effects in threshold public good games. Our particular focus is on why the probability of providing the public good appears to be higher in positive, give frames compared with negative, take frames. We show that the impulse balance theory can explain this effect. We also report a new experiment designed to test the predictions of the impulse balance theory. The results of the experiment fit well, both in quantitative and qualitative terms, with our predictions.

AB - In this paper, we revisit the evidence for framing effects in threshold public good games. Our particular focus is on why the probability of providing the public good appears to be higher in positive, give frames compared with negative, take frames. We show that the impulse balance theory can explain this effect. We also report a new experiment designed to test the predictions of the impulse balance theory. The results of the experiment fit well, both in quantitative and qualitative terms, with our predictions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060630521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jpet.12359

DO - 10.1111/jpet.12359

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 903

EP - 922

JO - Journal of Public Economic Theory

JF - Journal of Public Economic Theory

SN - 1467-9779

IS - 5

ER -