Abstract
Few would argue that regulatory decisions related to chemical substances, whether pre-market authorisations, setting of health-based reference values and environmental quality standards, or prioritizing for future testing and management measures, ought to be based on less than all reliable and relevant evidence
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 210-217 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Environment international |
| Volume | 128 |
| Early online date | 3 May 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2019 |
Bibliographical note
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).
Funding
These recommendations were formulated during a Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Pellston Workshop™ titled “Improving the usability of ecotoxicology in regulatory decision-making”, Aug 30–Sept 4, 2015. The authors would like to thank SETAC for practical and financial support before, during, and after the workshop. The authors would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
Keywords
- Chemical safety
- Decision-making
- Ecological risk assessment
- Ecotoxicology
- Environmental risk assessment
- Evidence-based
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Environmental Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Improving environmental risk assessments of chemicals: Steps towards evidence-based ecotoxicology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS