Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impacts on freshwater macrophytes produced by small invertebrate herbivores: Afrotropical and Neotropical wetlands compared

  • M. Celeste Franceschini
  • , Kevin J Murphy
  • , Isabel Moore
  • , Michael Kennedy
  • , Fedra Martinez
  • , Frank Willems
  • , M. Laura De Wysiecki
  • , Henry Sichingabula
    • Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral
    • University of Glasgow
    • Kasanka National Park
    • Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo
    • University of Zambia

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    166 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    We compare invertebrate herbivory upon 13 macrophyte species in freshwater wetland systems located in two global ecozones, the Afrotropics and Neotropics, in the context of biotic and environmental factors influencing these wetlands. The two ecozones are climatically similar regions, with similar water chemistry, but experience contrasting grazing and disturbance pressures from large mammalian herbivores. Our results for macrophytes show that small invertebrates removed significantly more lamina biomass per leaf in Neotropical macrophytes (6.55%) than Afrotropical ones (4.99%). Overall, the results indicate that underestimation of up to 15.6% of leaf biomass may occur if plant tissue removal by invertebrate herbivores is not included in estimates of plant biomass. Regarding the contrasting grazing and disturbance pressures from large herbivores influencing these wetlands, seven mammal species (especially the Black Lechwe antelope, Kobus leche) were observed impacting macrophytes in the Afrotropical wetlands, while in the Neotropics, only much smaller rodents, capybara, (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) were sporadically observed. We discuss the relevance of results for invertebrate herbivory in the context of both the methodological approach and the importance of large mammalian herbivores as biotic factors additionally impacting macrophyte populations in these subtropical to tropical wetlands.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3931-3950
    Number of pages20
    JournalHydrobiologia
    Volume847
    Issue number19
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 29 Jul 2020

    Bibliographical note

    The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04360-5

    Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

    Funder

    PICT 2160-2011, PICT 1910-2015 of the Agencia Nacional de Promoci?n Cient?fica y Tecnol?gica and PI 17Q003 of the Secretar?a General de Ciencia T?cnica de la Universidad Nacional del Nordeste (Argentina), the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland, and the Commission of the European Community/ACP Science and Technology Programme (Grant Number AFS/2009/219013).

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
      SDG 15 Life on Land

    Keywords

    • Herbivorous mammals
    • Freshwater ecosystems
    • Grazing Damage
    • Tropics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Impacts on freshwater macrophytes produced by small invertebrate herbivores: Afrotropical and Neotropical wetlands compared'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this