Identifying Training Deficiencies in Military Pilots by applying the human Factors Analysis and Classification System

Wen Chin Li, Don Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Without accurate analysis, it is difficult to identify training needs and develop the content of training programs required for preventing aviation accidents. The human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) is based on Reason’s system-wide model of human error. In this study, 523 accidents from the Republic of China Air Force were analyzed in which 1762 human errors were categorized. The results of the analysis showed that errors of judgment and poor decision-making were commonly reported amongst pilots. As a result, it was concluded that there was a need for military pilots to be trained specifically in making decisions in tactical environments. However, application of HFACS also allowed the identification of systemic training deficiencies within the organization further contributing to the accidents observed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-18
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics: JOSE
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Factor analysis
Human engineering
Statistical Factor Analysis
factor analysis
accident
human error
Military
Accidents
Decision making
Aircraft accidents
decision making
Aviation Accidents
Decision Making
air force
air traffic
training program
republic
Taiwan
organization
China

Keywords

  • Accident investigation
  • Error analysis
  • Human error
  • Human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS)
  • Training development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Safety Research
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{7259a3234f52422b848a12b1d2774613,
title = "Identifying Training Deficiencies in Military Pilots by applying the human Factors Analysis and Classification System",
abstract = "Without accurate analysis, it is difficult to identify training needs and develop the content of training programs required for preventing aviation accidents. The human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) is based on Reason’s system-wide model of human error. In this study, 523 accidents from the Republic of China Air Force were analyzed in which 1762 human errors were categorized. The results of the analysis showed that errors of judgment and poor decision-making were commonly reported amongst pilots. As a result, it was concluded that there was a need for military pilots to be trained specifically in making decisions in tactical environments. However, application of HFACS also allowed the identification of systemic training deficiencies within the organization further contributing to the accidents observed.",
keywords = "Accident investigation, Error analysis, Human error, Human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS), Training development",
author = "Li, {Wen Chin} and Don Harris",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/10803548.2013.11076962",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "3--18",
journal = "International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics",
issn = "1080-3548",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying Training Deficiencies in Military Pilots by applying the human Factors Analysis and Classification System

AU - Li, Wen Chin

AU - Harris, Don

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Without accurate analysis, it is difficult to identify training needs and develop the content of training programs required for preventing aviation accidents. The human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) is based on Reason’s system-wide model of human error. In this study, 523 accidents from the Republic of China Air Force were analyzed in which 1762 human errors were categorized. The results of the analysis showed that errors of judgment and poor decision-making were commonly reported amongst pilots. As a result, it was concluded that there was a need for military pilots to be trained specifically in making decisions in tactical environments. However, application of HFACS also allowed the identification of systemic training deficiencies within the organization further contributing to the accidents observed.

AB - Without accurate analysis, it is difficult to identify training needs and develop the content of training programs required for preventing aviation accidents. The human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) is based on Reason’s system-wide model of human error. In this study, 523 accidents from the Republic of China Air Force were analyzed in which 1762 human errors were categorized. The results of the analysis showed that errors of judgment and poor decision-making were commonly reported amongst pilots. As a result, it was concluded that there was a need for military pilots to be trained specifically in making decisions in tactical environments. However, application of HFACS also allowed the identification of systemic training deficiencies within the organization further contributing to the accidents observed.

KW - Accident investigation

KW - Error analysis

KW - Human error

KW - Human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS)

KW - Training development

U2 - 10.1080/10803548.2013.11076962

DO - 10.1080/10803548.2013.11076962

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 3

EP - 18

JO - International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

JF - International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

SN - 1080-3548

IS - 1

ER -