Identifying the key body size and maturity characteristics associated with superior physical fitness performance tests: does one size fit all?

Alan M. Nevill, Michael Duncan, Glauber C. Nobre, Adoraldo Gaya, Tony Myers, Julio Brugnara Mello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: To examine which key body size characteristics are common to success when performing a variety of physical fitness tests and, at the same time, to identify further characteristics that benefit only specific fitness tests. 

Methods: Cross-sectional study carried out with data from 94,484 6–18 year olds. The physical fitness tests were: 1) 20-m sprint test, 2) four-square agility test, 3) abdominal strength test (sit-ups/min), 4) horizontal jump test, 5) seated 2 kg medicine ball throw test and 6) a cardiorespiratory test (6 min run). The body size and maturation characteristics were body mass, height, arm span and maturity offset (MO). The ideal body size and MO characteristics associated with the six physical performance variables were identified using allometric modelling. 

Results: Two key characteristics associated with superior performances in all six physical performance tests were identified, to have a greater arm span together with a positive maturity offset. The arm span was the predictor with the largest effect size (Partial Eta Squared between 0.005 and 0.013) in five of the six physical fitness tests evaluated. The contribution of body mass varied depending on whether the physical performance test required the children to carry their body mass or not. In the case of endurance events, the mass term was negative. In the case when the test did not require the child to carry their body mass (e.g. throwing the medicine ball test), the mass term was always positive. However, for sprinting, the optimal performances peaked at 62 kg for 20 m sprinting and 73 kg for agility tests. 

Conclusion: The prominence of arm span’s influence underscores its role in sports evaluations and the talent identification processes, reaffirming its practical significance. In addition, the study hints at the nuanced relationship between body mass and specific test requirements, potentially guiding targeted training strategies for different physical tasks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1051-1063
Number of pages13
JournalSport Sciences for Health
Volume20
Issue number3
Early online date13 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2024.

Funder

This study was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, 305200/2013-5.

Funding

This study was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, 305200/2013-5.

FundersFunder number
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico305200/2013-5

    Keywords

    • Allometric modelling
    • Body mass
    • Arm span
    • Growth and decay
    • Gamma function models

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying the key body size and maturity characteristics associated with superior physical fitness performance tests: does one size fit all?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this