Identifying Non-adopter Consumer Segments: An Empirical Study on Earthquake Insurance Adoption in Turkey

Burcak Basbug Erkan, Feray Adiguzel, Ceylan Yozgatligil, Mirella Kleijnen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In recent years, steadily climbing natural disaster losses have increased the need to promote new financial risk transfer mechanisms, including insurance, as a mitigation tool to build resilient communities to recover faster after disaster occurrence. However, while the societal need for such policies is high, demand for natural disaster insurance typically is still low. While there is ample research on positive adoption decisions, reasons for non‐adoption has not yet received the attention it deserves. Using the case of earthquake insurance in Turkey, this study investigates how public policy makers and insurance companies can differentiate non‐adopter segments and consequently develop targeted strategies to stimulate the uptake of disaster insurance. Our study develops a non‐adopter typology consisting of four segments—state reliant positivist, dependers, adversaries, and uninformed loners. Differences among segments provide policy makers and insurance companies with meaningful insights to design and consequently introduce affordable natural disaster insurance to the market.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)662-685
Number of pages24
JournalTHE JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS
Volume53
Issue number2
Early online date5 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Turkey
Insurance
Empirical study
Earthquake
Natural disasters
Politicians
Insurance companies
Disaster
Risk transfer
Financial risk
Mitigation
Public policy

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: ‘Identifying Non-adopter Consumer Segments: An Empirical Study on Earthquake Insurance Adoption in Turkey' which has been published in final form at DOI 10.1111/joca.12217. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

Keywords

  • Non-adopters
  • Consumer resistance
  • Consumer segments
  • Protection motivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Identifying Non-adopter Consumer Segments: An Empirical Study on Earthquake Insurance Adoption in Turkey. / Basbug Erkan, Burcak; Adiguzel, Feray; Yozgatligil, Ceylan; Kleijnen, Mirella.

In: THE JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, Vol. 53, No. 2, 01.06.2019, p. 662-685.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Basbug Erkan, Burcak ; Adiguzel, Feray ; Yozgatligil, Ceylan ; Kleijnen, Mirella. / Identifying Non-adopter Consumer Segments: An Empirical Study on Earthquake Insurance Adoption in Turkey. In: THE JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS. 2019 ; Vol. 53, No. 2. pp. 662-685.
@article{b5c5d9cb20cd4abab92c110a3c454f8d,
title = "Identifying Non-adopter Consumer Segments: An Empirical Study on Earthquake Insurance Adoption in Turkey",
abstract = "In recent years, steadily climbing natural disaster losses have increased the need to promote new financial risk transfer mechanisms, including insurance, as a mitigation tool to build resilient communities to recover faster after disaster occurrence. However, while the societal need for such policies is high, demand for natural disaster insurance typically is still low. While there is ample research on positive adoption decisions, reasons for non‐adoption has not yet received the attention it deserves. Using the case of earthquake insurance in Turkey, this study investigates how public policy makers and insurance companies can differentiate non‐adopter segments and consequently develop targeted strategies to stimulate the uptake of disaster insurance. Our study develops a non‐adopter typology consisting of four segments—state reliant positivist, dependers, adversaries, and uninformed loners. Differences among segments provide policy makers and insurance companies with meaningful insights to design and consequently introduce affordable natural disaster insurance to the market.",
keywords = "Non-adopters, Consumer resistance, Consumer segments, Protection motivation",
author = "{Basbug Erkan}, Burcak and Feray Adiguzel and Ceylan Yozgatligil and Mirella Kleijnen",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: ‘Identifying Non-adopter Consumer Segments: An Empirical Study on Earthquake Insurance Adoption in Turkey' which has been published in final form at DOI 10.1111/joca.12217. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/joca.12217",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "662--685",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Affairs",
issn = "0022-0078",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying Non-adopter Consumer Segments: An Empirical Study on Earthquake Insurance Adoption in Turkey

AU - Basbug Erkan, Burcak

AU - Adiguzel, Feray

AU - Yozgatligil, Ceylan

AU - Kleijnen, Mirella

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: ‘Identifying Non-adopter Consumer Segments: An Empirical Study on Earthquake Insurance Adoption in Turkey' which has been published in final form at DOI 10.1111/joca.12217. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - In recent years, steadily climbing natural disaster losses have increased the need to promote new financial risk transfer mechanisms, including insurance, as a mitigation tool to build resilient communities to recover faster after disaster occurrence. However, while the societal need for such policies is high, demand for natural disaster insurance typically is still low. While there is ample research on positive adoption decisions, reasons for non‐adoption has not yet received the attention it deserves. Using the case of earthquake insurance in Turkey, this study investigates how public policy makers and insurance companies can differentiate non‐adopter segments and consequently develop targeted strategies to stimulate the uptake of disaster insurance. Our study develops a non‐adopter typology consisting of four segments—state reliant positivist, dependers, adversaries, and uninformed loners. Differences among segments provide policy makers and insurance companies with meaningful insights to design and consequently introduce affordable natural disaster insurance to the market.

AB - In recent years, steadily climbing natural disaster losses have increased the need to promote new financial risk transfer mechanisms, including insurance, as a mitigation tool to build resilient communities to recover faster after disaster occurrence. However, while the societal need for such policies is high, demand for natural disaster insurance typically is still low. While there is ample research on positive adoption decisions, reasons for non‐adoption has not yet received the attention it deserves. Using the case of earthquake insurance in Turkey, this study investigates how public policy makers and insurance companies can differentiate non‐adopter segments and consequently develop targeted strategies to stimulate the uptake of disaster insurance. Our study develops a non‐adopter typology consisting of four segments—state reliant positivist, dependers, adversaries, and uninformed loners. Differences among segments provide policy makers and insurance companies with meaningful insights to design and consequently introduce affordable natural disaster insurance to the market.

KW - Non-adopters

KW - Consumer resistance

KW - Consumer segments

KW - Protection motivation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050509070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/joca.12217

DO - 10.1111/joca.12217

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 662

EP - 685

JO - Journal of Consumer Affairs

JF - Journal of Consumer Affairs

SN - 0022-0078

IS - 2

ER -