I take full responsibility, I take some responsibility, I’ll take half of it but no more than that: Princess Diana and the location of blame in the Panorama interview

Jackie Abell, Elizabeth Stokoe

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    27 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The focus of this article is the conversational management of blaming and accountability. In particular, we explore how involved speakers routinely allocate and avoid blame in everyday talk. In considering such a problematic notion of social interaction, we analyse the BBC interview between Princess Diana and Martin Bashir that was aired on British national television on 20 November 1995. In the analysis, we consider how different discursive strategies are employed by speakers in ways that work up credible and authentic accounts. More specifically, we argue that Diana attributes blame to external `others' within a negotiated context of routine description of past events. Categories such as `the media', `the royal household' and `Charles' are constructed and made relevant throughout the interview and the analytic interest is what is accomplished rhetorically for both Diana and Bashir. Of further interest is the overall script design of the interview and how devices such as script formulation, stake management, footing shifts and progressive narrative function in the negotiation of blame. We conclude that `doing blaming' is attended to and managed locally by participants in conversation and this `doing' can be accomplished in a number of ways.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)297-319
    Number of pages22
    JournalDiscourse Studies
    Volume1
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 1999

    Fingerprint

    Interviews
    responsibility
    interview
    Television
    Equipment Design
    BBC
    Social Responsibility
    Negotiating
    Interpersonal Relations
    management
    television
    conversation
    narrative
    event
    interaction
    Responsibility
    Princess Diana
    Panorama
    Stakes
    Discursive Strategies

    Cite this

    @article{bed0df16bccf41f6b51d8fd3eb29e2f1,
    title = "I take full responsibility, I take some responsibility, I’ll take half of it but no more than that: Princess Diana and the location of blame in the Panorama interview",
    abstract = "The focus of this article is the conversational management of blaming and accountability. In particular, we explore how involved speakers routinely allocate and avoid blame in everyday talk. In considering such a problematic notion of social interaction, we analyse the BBC interview between Princess Diana and Martin Bashir that was aired on British national television on 20 November 1995. In the analysis, we consider how different discursive strategies are employed by speakers in ways that work up credible and authentic accounts. More specifically, we argue that Diana attributes blame to external `others' within a negotiated context of routine description of past events. Categories such as `the media', `the royal household' and `Charles' are constructed and made relevant throughout the interview and the analytic interest is what is accomplished rhetorically for both Diana and Bashir. Of further interest is the overall script design of the interview and how devices such as script formulation, stake management, footing shifts and progressive narrative function in the negotiation of blame. We conclude that `doing blaming' is attended to and managed locally by participants in conversation and this `doing' can be accomplished in a number of ways.",
    author = "Jackie Abell and Elizabeth Stokoe",
    year = "1999",
    month = "8",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/1461445699001003002",
    language = "English",
    volume = "1",
    pages = "297--319",
    journal = "Discourse Studies",
    issn = "1461-4456",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - I take full responsibility, I take some responsibility, I’ll take half of it but no more than that: Princess Diana and the location of blame in the Panorama interview

    AU - Abell, Jackie

    AU - Stokoe, Elizabeth

    PY - 1999/8/1

    Y1 - 1999/8/1

    N2 - The focus of this article is the conversational management of blaming and accountability. In particular, we explore how involved speakers routinely allocate and avoid blame in everyday talk. In considering such a problematic notion of social interaction, we analyse the BBC interview between Princess Diana and Martin Bashir that was aired on British national television on 20 November 1995. In the analysis, we consider how different discursive strategies are employed by speakers in ways that work up credible and authentic accounts. More specifically, we argue that Diana attributes blame to external `others' within a negotiated context of routine description of past events. Categories such as `the media', `the royal household' and `Charles' are constructed and made relevant throughout the interview and the analytic interest is what is accomplished rhetorically for both Diana and Bashir. Of further interest is the overall script design of the interview and how devices such as script formulation, stake management, footing shifts and progressive narrative function in the negotiation of blame. We conclude that `doing blaming' is attended to and managed locally by participants in conversation and this `doing' can be accomplished in a number of ways.

    AB - The focus of this article is the conversational management of blaming and accountability. In particular, we explore how involved speakers routinely allocate and avoid blame in everyday talk. In considering such a problematic notion of social interaction, we analyse the BBC interview between Princess Diana and Martin Bashir that was aired on British national television on 20 November 1995. In the analysis, we consider how different discursive strategies are employed by speakers in ways that work up credible and authentic accounts. More specifically, we argue that Diana attributes blame to external `others' within a negotiated context of routine description of past events. Categories such as `the media', `the royal household' and `Charles' are constructed and made relevant throughout the interview and the analytic interest is what is accomplished rhetorically for both Diana and Bashir. Of further interest is the overall script design of the interview and how devices such as script formulation, stake management, footing shifts and progressive narrative function in the negotiation of blame. We conclude that `doing blaming' is attended to and managed locally by participants in conversation and this `doing' can be accomplished in a number of ways.

    U2 - 10.1177/1461445699001003002

    DO - 10.1177/1461445699001003002

    M3 - Article

    VL - 1

    SP - 297

    EP - 319

    JO - Discourse Studies

    JF - Discourse Studies

    SN - 1461-4456

    IS - 3

    ER -